REVIEW: “The Nun II” (2023)

Despite being a genuine fan of the wickedly fun Conjuring Universe, I have to admit it’s a bit of a mixed bag. The three centerpiece films (“The Conjuring”, “The Conjuring 2”, and “The Conjuring 3: The Devil Made Me Do It”), based on the real-life exploits of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren, are delightfully fun slices of period horror. It’s the spin-offs that have been hit-or-miss.

A prime example is 2019’s “The Nun”, a movie that had so much working for it – a great setting, a terrifying supernatural antagonist, and a terrific and often underrated lead in Taissa Farmiga. But it ended up suffering due to the film’s unremarkable storytelling that consistently milked the same handful of overused horror tricks. It wasn’t a bad movie. It simply left so much of its potential untapped.

Still I was pretty excited to hear that Warner Bros. had green lit a sequel. “The Nun II” sees Farmiga returning as Sister Irene, the young nun who miraculous survived the horrifying events at Saint Cartha abbey (see the first film). Four years have passed and she is now a part of a new convent. She’s found happiness yet she keeps her experiences at Saint Cartha a secret.

Image Courtesy of Warner Bros.

But following the gruesome death of a priest in Tarascon, France, the church calls on her to travel to the French monastery and investigate. She’s accompanied by the rebellious Sister Debra (unconvincingly played by a miscast Storm Reid). The two learn that the monastery is now a girl’s boarding school and among those employed there is a hunky handyman named Maurice (Jonas Bloquet) who has ties to Saint Cartha. He has his eye on Kate (Anna Popplewell), a teacher with a sweet young daughter, Sophie (Katelyn Rose Downey).

As you can probably guess, Sister Irene finds herself once again face-to-face with Valak (Bonnie Aarons), the demon nun first introduced in “The Conjuring 2”. But before that happens several pieces have to fall in place first. Unfortunately not all of them do. There are a handful obvious plot holes that are hard miss and making sense out of everything is no easy task. Yet the movie remains engaging. Director Michael Chaves pulls off some nifty tricks and sustains a genuinely creepy atmosphere throughout.

Taissa Farmiga (the real-life sister of Vera Farmiga who plays Lorraine Warren in the three Conjuring films) remains a crafty bit of casting. And while it’s hard to buy into the church fully entrusting Sister Irene with such an investigation seemingly on a whim, Farmiga’s performance is good throughout and she wins our investment even when the writing seems unsure about where to take her character. Farmiga is a real strength.

I also enjoyed the gonzo final 15 minutes where Chaves lets it rip, offering up some good jolts within his killer horror set pieces. That said, the movie still stumbles in key places. In the case of “The Nun II”, its biggest problem centers around the story itself which at times feels stitched together rather than fully thought out. It also commits the sin of leaving its titular character, the truly unsettling Valak, on the sidelines for far too long. It all makes for a sequel that is a nice step up from its predecessor, yet one that still hasn’t fully realized its terrifying potential. “The Nun II” opens today exclusively in theaters.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS

9 thoughts on “REVIEW: “The Nun II” (2023)

  1. I’ve never been a fan of any of these but I know they must have a following to keep making so many of them. Some I’ve found creepy and somewhat interesting, but beyond that I just haven’t felt they were good, solid movies. I think a 2.5 here is a skip.

    • Thanks so much. And great to here you’re taking up reviewing movies. It’s something I love doing. I like your style. The only feedback is to keep writing. It’s the best way to keep developing your voice. 👍🏼👍🏼

  2. Pingback: New on Home Video: “The Nun II” on 4K Ultra HD + Digital |

Leave a comment