REVIEW: “A Complete Unknown” (2024)

Upon first hearing that Timothée Chalamet was set the play Bob Dylan in an upcoming biopic, I admit to thinking they could have found someone better. But after seeing him in the role of the legendary American singer-songwriter, I wondered who could have played Dylan better. Chalamet delivers a knock-out performance in James Mangold’s “A Complete Unknown”, a beguiling biography based on Elijah Wald’s 2015 book “Dylan Goes Electric! Newport, Seeger, Dylan, and the Night That Split the Sixties.”

Chalamet tirelessly prepared for the role, learning how to play guitar and the harmonica while immersing himself into Dylan’s iconic lyrics and singing style. Mangold certainly put the actor’s training to good use. It’s said that Chalamet performed an astonishing 40 songs for the film. But here’s the best part – he surprisingly nails them which not only enhances his performance but strips away any hint of artifice. For 141 minutes Timothée Chalamet is Bob Dylan and we never doubt it for a second.

Among the many good choices that make “A Complete Unknown” work is Mangold’s decision to hone in on one segment of Dylan’s fascinating life. This is no cradle-to-grave biopic. Rather it’s an ensemble movie that traces Dylan’s musical journey from his arrival in New York City to his unforgettable 1965 performance at the Newport Folk Festival which sparked controversy after he took the stage with an electric guitar much to the dismay of his devoted folk music fans. 

Image Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures

The film opens in 1961 with a 19-year-old Bob arriving in New York City after hitching a ride from Minnesota. He has made the trek in order to visit his idol, Woody Guthrie (Scoot McNairy) who was committed to Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital. While visiting Woody, Bob meets the beloved folk singer Pete Seeger (Edward Norton) who immediately takes a liking to the young aspiring singer. Pete is even more smitten with Bob’s songwriting and begins introducing him around the New York City folk scene.

From there Mangold and his co-writer Jay Cocks chronicle Bob’s rise to fame mostly through the relationships that helped pave his path. One of his earliest is with Sylvie Russo (Elle Fanning), a character based on Suze Rotolo. Sylvie is more than just a love interest. She’s key in opening Bob’s eyes up to the troubled real world which would inspire so many of his hit songs. And more than anyone else, she encouraged him to sing his own songs after his manager Albert Grossman (Dan Fogler) gets him a record deal with Capitol Records.

The film also explores Dylan’s connection with fellow folk singer Joan Baez who is wonderfully played by rising star Monica Barbaro. Baez was already established when she first met Bob Dylan and she was one of the first to record some of his original songs which helped to put him on the map. Barbaro and Chalamet are terrific together, capturing the creative magic conjured whenever Baez and Dylan sang together while touching on the pair’s more tumultuous personal relationship.

Image Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures

The most fun of the supporting cast is Boyd Holbrook playing the great Johnny Cash. He doesn’t get many scenes but he steals every one he’s in through a performance that’s bursting with charisma. Holbrook gloriously channels Cash’s energy and swagger while adding a little flavor of his own to the character. Now I want another Johnny Cash movie with Boyd Holbrook playing ‘The Man in Black’.

While Mangold spends plenty of time delving into the personal life of Bob Dylan, he also takes us on a tour of American music history. Not only does “A Complete Unknown” honor traditional folk music and its impact on American culture, but it also shows how music was changing alongside that very same culture. That culminates in the film’s kinetic recreation of the 1965 Newport Folk Festival where Dylan shocked fans and angered festival heads by playing electric rather than acoustic. His brief set has been called a watershed moment for both folk and rock music.

While “A Complete Unknown” sweeps you away with its focused storytelling, timeless music, and phenomenal performances, it’s also strengthened by its period-perfect production design and costumes as well as rich cinematography from Phedon Papamichael. But it’s James Mangold’s clear passion that brings it all together. It seeps from every pore of his movie. And while fans of the music may find more to enjoy, there’s so much else to love that transcends mere musical tastes. It’s a transporting musical journey and one of the year’s best movies.

VERDICT – 4.5 STARS

First Glance: “Superman” (2025) Teaser Trailer

There has been a lot of buzz, both good and bad, about James Gunn’s ascension to the head of DC Studios. Without question Gunn has his fans and they aren’t afraid to share their support. But there just as many who are skeptical and for good reason. I remain a huge fan of the Zack Snyder cinematic universe that existed prior to the studio tearing it apart. And I’ve been lukewarm on Gunn’s superhero projects which often follow the same blueprint. But I’m very open to seeing his vision for DC starting with “Superman”.

The first teaser trailer for Gunn’s “Superman” has dropped and it gives us a first glance at the film that will kick off his DC universe. The trailer doesn’t reveal much but it allows us to see David Corenswet in action as both Superman and Clark Kent. We see Rachel Brosnahan as the new Lois Lane. We see Nicholas Hoult as the universe’s Lex Luthor. We even see a caped Krypto which brought an ear-to-ear smile to my face.

But the trailer is littered with other heroes and villains which speaks to one of my biggest concerns – is Gunn cramming too much into his first film. We’ll see. And while the trailer offers a number of captivating images, I still don’t have a good feel of the movie or of Gunn’s vision for the character. Will he capture the essence of Superman? Can he make Superman resonate with a new audience? Can he win over those who preferred a “Man of Steel” sequel? Who knows. But I’ll be there on opening day to see.

“Superman” flies into theaters on July 11, 2025. Check out the trailer below and let me know if you’ll be seeing it or taking a pass.

First Glance: “Black Bag”

Steven Soderbergh has quite a first quarter lining up in 2025. He already has a creepy psychological (or is it supernatural) thriller releasing in late January called “Presence”. Yesterday Focus Features dropped the first trailer for “Black Bag”, a star-studded spy thriller directed by Soderbergh and starring the magnetic duo of Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender. This first glance looks to be a hearty feast for fans of the genre and those who love its two stars.

Presented as a more serious “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” or “True Lies”, Soderbergh’s “Black Bag” follows esteemed intelligence agents George Woodhouse (Fassbender) and his loving wife Kathryn (Blanchett). When suspicions arise that Kathryn is a double-agent, George is put on the case to find out the truth. He ends up caught between his loyalties to his wife and to his country. The trailer looks fantastic and Soderbergh certainly knows how to ratchet up tension.

“Black Bag” releases exclusively in theaters on March 14th. Check out the trailer below and let me know if you’ll be seeing it or taking a pass.

REVIEW: “The Brutalist” (2024)

It’s always interesting when a movie arrives on the scene to immeasurable praise. Your anticipation builds and your expectations rise. And then you see the film and you get to see for yourself if the product warranted the enormous hype. That has certainly happened with “The Brutalist”, a 215-minute arthouse epic that has been heralded as a “masterpiece” by more than a few enthusiastic early viewers.

“The Brutalist” certainly had my attention with Academy Award winner Adrien Brody in the lead role and the criminally underappreciated Guy Pearce getting a meaty supporting part. I loved the idea of a immigrant saga beginning in the latter days of World War II and spanning several decades. And I loved that it would attempt to examine the post-war Jewish experience through a fresh and compelling lens.

All of those things speak to the strengths of “The Brutalist”, and for a while they were working in such harmony that I wondered if I too would be throwing out the “m” word to describe director Brady Corbet’s work. But over time you begin to notice that its brilliance is too often dimmed by his ambitions. There’s no denying the excellence of “The Brutalist” when Corbet is working in rhythm, which he does for most of the film. At the same time, there are nagging issues that he just can’t shake. More on those in a second.

Image Courtesy of A24

Beginning in 1947, Brody plays László Tóth, a Hungarian-Jewish architect and Holocaust survivor who manages to escape his home country and emigrate to the United States. Once established there, he hopes to find and bring over his wife, Erzsébet (Felicity Jones) and his niece Zsófia (Raffey Cassidy) who he was forcibly separated from during the Nazi roundups.

After arriving in New York City, László takes a bus to Philadelphia where he’s put up and given a job by his immigrant cousin Attila (Alessandro Nivola) who runs a furniture store with his American wife Audrey (Emma Laird). Lázsló gets his first real chance to show his architectural skills after the pampered children of a wealthy industrialist, Harrison Lee Van Buren (Pearce) hire him to turn their father’s dated study into a modernized library. László’s renovation is phenomenal, yet the job doesn’t go as planned and he’s forced to head out on his own.

Years pass and László is living in a homeless shelter and working whatever jobs he can get. That’s when he gets a surprise visit from Harrison whose new library has been making the rounds in popular architecture magazines. It prompted Harrison to do some research where he discovered László’s renowned work while in Budapest. Now the enamored Harrison wants to hire László to build a community center on his property in the small borough of Doylestown. He will be well compensated and allowed to stay in the guesthouse on the grounds. László accepts the offer and immediately gets to work.

Jump ahead to 1953. The construction of the community center is slowly consuming László. But he gets a reprieve when Erzsébet and Zsófia arrive in Philly. Their reunion is sweet, but before long László is back focused on his work. Meanwhile his growing addiction to heroin is becoming hard to keep secret. It all points towards an inevitable collision, but the road to it is slowed by narrative potholes. It’s as if Corbet and his co-writer Mona Fastvold have built two avenues of self-destruction that rarely intersect.

Image Courtesy of A24

This speaks to one of the movie’s most frustrating issues. It feels as if we’re navigating two different movies telling two different stories. One is a captivating feature film about a Jewish immigrant crushed under the weight of an unforgiving new country and his own ambition. The other is an erratic short film about a man’s drug-fueled psychosexual foray into prostitution and pornography. If you squint hard enough you can find connections. But they’re too threadbare to have any impact.

Regardless, the performances from Brody and Pearce never falter and both should be shoo-ins for Oscar nominations. Brody powerfully emanates a similar raw humanity as he did in “The Pianist” while Pearce convincingly balances ego and charm, right up until an out-of-the-blue action jarringly strips away anything resembling nuance. Jones doesn’t fare as well. She is handcuffed by a one-note role that leaves her frustrated and victimized despite being the most clear-eyed of the bunch.

“The Brutalist” is the latest in the parade of films aimed at demythologizing the American Dream. When Corbet is his most focused, it’s an utterly captivating feature. It’s a visually engrossing film with many of cinematographer Lol Crawley’s images leaving you in awe even as some are glaringly on-point. And Daniel Blumberg’s score is rich and resonating. But Corbet’s efforts at making something momentous becomes an impediment. Though brilliant in lengthy stretches, his storytelling suffers, from László’s clashing storylines to the flimsy ending that fails to give characters the send-offs they’ve earned.

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Kraven the Hunter” (2024)

It’s unfortunate, but it seems that “Kraven the Hunter” was dead in the water before it ever hit theaters. It’s all because both audiences and critics have long lost faith in Sony’s Spider-Man Universe. Sony’s superhero endeavor began with some early cynicism (especially from a segment of MCU loyalists). But it was the disappointing quality of the movies that eventually led to the negativity.

But is that fair to “Kraven the Hunter”, the sixth and some believe final film in Sony’s struggling Spider-Man Universe? Probably not. But the movie doesn’t exactly make a strong case for itself. “Kraven” falls in line with other SMU movies in that it takes a genuinely interesting character and completely underwhelms in its effort to bring them to the big screen. ”Kraven” isn’t bafflingly bad like “Madame Web”. But it’s hampered by problems that have plagued most of these films.

What’s frustrating is that there is a good movie somewhere inside of “Kraven”. It has a strong lead in Aaron Taylor-Johnson. It backs him up with two Academy Award winners in Russell Crowe and Ariana DeBose. It’s made by an intriguing director, J. C. Chandor. It certainly has plenty of compelling source material to draw from. And it’s grittier and bloodier than any of the previous movies.

Image Courtesy of Sony Pictures Releasing

But none of those things are able to overcome the script from the screenwriting trio of Richard Wenk, Art Marcum, and Matt Holloway. It’s all built around an undeniably silly premise which can be okay if the movie has fun with it. “Kraven” doesn’t seem to recognize its own silliness. Worse are the underdeveloped characters who are given more bad dialogue than believable motives or emotional range. The cast tries hard to work through it. But it’s too much for even this level of talent to overcome.

The film’s flashback opening introduces us to Sergei Kravinoff and his kid brother Dmitri. They’re the sons of Nikolai Kravinoff (Crowe), a ruthless crime lord who is as tough on his boys as he is his enemies. Nikolai clearly favors the older Sergei who he hopes will be a worthy heir in his hyper-masculine eyes. And while Dimitri is starved for his father’s approval, he’s repeatedly shunned for his supposed weakness.

While in Ghana on a big game hunt with their father, Sergei is attacked by a massive lion while protecting a terrified Dmitri. The lion savagely maims Sergei and drags him away where he’s later found near death by a young girl named Calypso. She slips him a mystical healing potion that mixes with a little lion’s blood. Sergei makes a miraculous recovery but never meets the girl who saved him. And after his father berates him for showing weakness, Sergei runs away from home.

Image Courtesy of Sony Pictures Releasing

Years later, Sergei (a chiseled Taylor-Johnson), now imbued with unexplainable powers from the potion, secretly hunts and kills certain criminals under the name Kraven. In between kills he has been trying to find Calypso (DeBose) who now is a successful lawyer in London’s largest firm. In the meantime Dmitri (Fred Hechinger) is kidnapped by one of Nikolai’s rivals (Alessandro Nivola). With his father unwilling to pay the $20 million ransom, Sergei reveals his Kraven persona and sets off to rescue his brother.

The movie has several good ideas working simultaneously but not harmoniously. There’s a bonkers superhero movie; a bloody action flick; a piercing family drama; a gritty crime thriller. Those are a lot of threads and they speak to the movie’s attempt at doing something different. They add some decent drama to the Kravinoff’s family dynamic and fuel some brutally fun action sequences. But Chandor can’t weave them together into something cohesive.

An argument can be made that “Kraven the Hunter” is the best movie in Spider-Man Universe. You could also say that’s a pretty low bar. Regardless, it’s not as bad as the critically- charged shredding it has received. At the same time, it’s not what I would call a good movie. Even with a well cast and fully committed Aaron Taylor-Johnson doing everything he can to earn our investment, it’s hard to find much to rave about in what may be the death knell for Sony’s Spidey-Venture.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Wicked” (2024)

Okay see if you can follow me. “Wicked” is the first film in a two-part movie adaptation of the Broadway stage musical of the same name which is based on the 1995 Gregory Maguire novel which was inspired by the “Oz” book series which provided the source material for the beloved 1939 Victor Fleming movie musical, “The Wizard of Oz”. Whew.

“Wicked” is a $150 million fantasy musical directed by Jon M. Chu (“Crazy Rich Asians”). Co-written by the duo of Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox, it tells a fantastical story set in the Land of Oz that’s loaded with easy to spot social subtext. “Wicked” is a movie of two halves – a fun and comically-charged first half and a more adventurous yet plodding second half which is where the film’s lengthy 160-minute runtime can be felt. Meanwhile its visuals are a mixed bag, offering some elaborate practical sets but with muted digital effects that rarely wow the way they intend to.

The movie opens with the citizens of Munchkinland getting news that the Wicked Witch of the West is dead. As they celebrate, Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) arrives to join the festivities. As she’s about to depart, a young girl asks the Barbie-pink Glinda if it’s true that she and the Witch were once friends. She answers by telling the gathered Munchkins (and us) the backstory of Elphaba Thropp, the future Wicked Witch of the West.

Image Courtesy of Universal Pictures

From there we’re transported back several years where we are introduced to Elphaba Thropp (Cynthia Erivo). Born with green skin and imbued with suppressed magical powers, Elphaba has had a tough life marked by ridicule and loneliness. She arrives at Shiz University (and no, the dean isn’t Snoop Dogg) on orientation day to drop off her paraplegic little sister, Nessarose (Marissa Bode). Also arriving is Galinda Upland (Grande), a popular and pampered rich girl who we quickly learn is impervious to her own privilege.

After an unplanned display of Elphaba’s powers literally shakes up the campus, the school’s Dean of Sorcery Studies, Madam Morrible (a miscast Michelle Yeoh) agrees to teach Elphaba privately much to the chagrin of Galinda who wanted to be her pupil. At first Galinda’s jealousy (mixed with her snobbery) leads her to humiliate Elphaba. But an unexpected act of kindness by Elphaba opens Galinda’s eyes and the two become unexpected friends despite their polar opposite personalities.

The entire university segment is “Wicked” at its best. The humor is spot-on with Grande’s pin-point timing bringing most of the film’s biggest laughs. She nails Galinda’s oblivious nature and is the perfect target for Erivo’s witty sarcasm. While the big musical numbers are showier and grab more attention, it’s the comic energy that really drives the first half. And while there are a couple of semi-memorable tunes, it was the well written and delivered humor that surprised me the most.

Image Courtesy of Universal Pictures

The movie does introduce several more characters, none of whom are given enough depth to leave much of a mark. There’s Pfannee (Bowen Yang), Galinda’s fawning college friend. There’s Boq Woodsman (Ethan Slater), a lovesick Munchkin who has the hots for Galinda. Peter Dinklage voices Dr. Dillamond, a talking goat who teaches history and leads an underground movement to restore animal rights. And there is the new transfer Fiyero Tigelaar (Jonathan Bailey), a dashing prince from Winkie Country.

The movie shifts after Elphaba receives an invitation to travel to The Emerald City where she’ll meet The Wonderful Wizard of Oz played by the always irresistible Jeff Goldblum. Refusing to let her nervous friend go alone, Galinda (now going by Glinda for a pretty funny reason) hops the train with Elphaba and they set out on what becomes an unexpected adventure. This is also where the humor vanishes, the effects get a little shakier, and the story begins to drag as it finally builds to its cliffhanging crescendo.

Despite putting in a lot of effort and even more studio money, “Wicked” doesn’t quite dazzle the way it wants to. It’s an uneven and unwieldy production that packs some early laughs but never soars either as a musical or a fantasy epic. It’s mostly due to the storytelling which is hampered by its inconsistent pacing, underdeveloped plot-lines, and heavy-handed (and at times patronizing) messaging. And neither the sub-par visuals or large-scale musical numbers are enough to fall back on.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS