Science fiction is often times a hard sell to movie critics. It can be an even harder sell to moviegoers who aren’t big fans of the genre. I can boldly state that I am a sci-fi guy. I can get lost in well written and well crafted science fiction. For science fiction to work you have to sell the audience on what they’re seeing on screen. The audience has to believe it, not so much from a realism standpoint, but from the perspective of the characters. They have to believe that what they’re seeing is completely consistent with the world the characters are living in. Often times this works due to strong characters worth investing in and an imaginative world laced with thin strands of believability. Director Ridley Scott accomplished this in 1979 with his sci-fi classic “Alien”. Now he’s back with “Prometheus” and he just might have another classic on his hands.

The movie follows the crew of the space ship “Prometheus” and it’s mission to make contact with those believed to have created human life. Two years prior to the mission, scientists Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) discovered the same star map on several different dig sites of ancient civilizations. Believing the star maps are invitations, they join the “Prometheus” crew on a mission funded by a mysterious elderly corporate man named Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce). After a long stasis, the crew awaken to find they have arrived at the remote moon LV-233, the site believed to be inhabited by those who created human life. Of course we know that things aren’t as simple as they appear. The story then takes off and we soon discover that its not only the moon that holds secrets, but also the crew members.

The Prometheus has an interesting crew besides Shaw and Holloway. Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron) is an employee of Weyland Industries who is sent to monitor the mission. She has an ominous presence and her true motivations are hard to decipher. The one thing that’s clear is that she has her own agenda. David (Michael Fassbender) is the ship’s android created by Weyland Industries. He monitors and maintains the ship but there is something unnerving and mysterious about him. Idris Elba plays Janek, the ship’s captain. He’s a straight-shooter who takes his responsibilities seriously. Some of these and the other crewmen believe in the mission while others are in it for other reasons. But all get more than they bargain for.

There is also the underlying question of faith versus science that pops up throughout the film. Shaw’s faith, that she shared with her father, is constantly brought into question by those with a more scientific slant. But I like how Scott never discounts or discredits her belief. In fact, it becomes clear that all the scientific knowledge they thought they had didn’t give them the answers they sought. I also liked how the movie plays with he contrast between human curiosity and things better left alone. The human desire to know can at times be a wonderful thing. But Scott shows us it can also bring severe consequences.

“Prometheus” takes place within the same world as the “Alien” films but it also sets out to create a new branch of mythology. Scott has been toying with the idea for the film for a long time and after several changes of direction, the results are most satisfying. “Prometheus” feels like an “Alien” picture and at times you see some of the same filmmaking style as was used in the original “Alien” movie. Ridley Scott starts the film out with a deliberate but measured pace, slowly asking questions and building up tension. I found myself completely immersed and constantly wondering “Is this the scene where everything blows up in their face?” John Spaihts and Damon Lindelof’s story gives us a lot of information early, some that’s intended to build the mythology, but some that leave us guessing right along with the characters. I found it to be a phenomenal buildup to the cataclysm that we know could come at any second.

When things do come to a head, the movie’s pace most certainly picks up and the audience is taken on one heck of a ride. Questions are answered as we are exposed to the truth behind the Engineers and their plans. One of my favorite things about the movie was it’s great assortment of characters and we begin to see the motivations and secrets behind the most mysterious of them. They also begin to drop like flies as the ‘survival movie’ element of “Prometheus” kicks in. This is where the movie does run a little off course. There were a couple of things that happen that seem to be out of the clear blue and with no real explanation. It also seems that in the frantic attempt to bring everything together, some useful details were left out. On the flip side, it’s clear Scott intentionally left many questions unanswered, questions that could conveniently (and hopefully) be answered in a sequel. 

The cast of “Prometheus” really shines and some of the performances really stand out. There’s no way to talk about the acting without first mentioning Michael Fassbender. His ability to capture the mystery and complexity of an emotionless, human imitating android is stunning. He never gives away his motivations prematurely and his looks, speech, and mannerisms are simply perfect. He creepily moves about the ship taking care of things while clearly having a more secret agenda. Fassbender sells all of this to us brilliantly. I also really liked Theron who always seems to be in the background observing but who also desperately wants more control than she has. Elba is also good as the Captain, a character that at times came dangerously close to being a stereotype yet he adds a freshness that I really liked. Then of course there is Noomi Rapace. She beat out big names like Natalie Portman and Anne Hathaway for the role and it’s clear Scott made a good choice. It’s a demanding role and Rapace is definitely up to the task.

I also have to briefly talk about the spectacular look of “Prometheus”. Scott certainly uses the modern-day special effects technology to his advantage creating some amazing visuals. The CGI is top-notch and never feels underdone. What’s even more impressive is that Scott insisted on building several sets from the ground up passing over the green screens in many instances. While there is a ton of CGI, I loved the fact that this old school filmmaker still uses old school techniques and uses them well. The futuristic technology in the movie is a blast and I loved watching each cool creation from their vehicles to the suits to “Prometheus” itself. Scott’s visual style is noticeable even here. He enjoys wide but structured shots and he doesn’t try to stage shots with fancy gimmicks like herky-jerky hand-held cameras to add a “chaotic” effect. He frames his shots and then trusts his vision. I like that. The movie also is one of the rare instances where I enjoyed the 3D. It was shot in 3D and Scott had it in mind throughout the picture. But he doesn’t overdo it. It simply feels like part of the movie. But it also doesn’t make or break the movie. I would have liked the film just as much in 2D.

Like I said, I’m a sci-fi guy and when it’s done well I’m all onboard. “Prometheus” is science fiction done well by a director that has already given us one of the greatest sci-fi/horror movies of all time. It’s a visual delight with a story that delivers genuine intensity, some great characters, and an ending that had me howling for more. It almost pays homage to the first two “Alien” films with some striking parallels in story structure and even in dialogue. I loved that. “Prometheus” is certainly a movie that someone could sit down with a pen and paper and find flaws. For me it was an amazing experience. A reminder of how cool science fiction can be and once again I was drawn into a director’s world and stayed there for the whole ride. In other words, I really, really liked “Prometheus”.

17 thoughts on ““PROMETHEUS” – 4 1/2 STARS

  1. Great review! Don’t think I’d give it 4.5, more like 3.5 for me. It was a really fun movie but I have a lot of unanswered questions. And I thought it set out to be smarter than it ended up being. Which is the real shame as I think this could have been a really brilliant film. However it’s still bloody entertaining!

    • Thanks bro!

      I think Scott intended to be cryptic in several places. I feel he also meant to ask questions that we the audience are left to answer for ourselves individually. Plus, he clearly has a sequel in mind (as has stated as much) so some loose ends are left untied.

      But I can see where some may have a problem with it. It’s not the most polished writing in the second half of the movie but I really went with it.

  2. Great Review Keith. It’s probably the most positive review I’ve read on this. Personally, I was disappointed. 3 stars from me. I found the writings very poor. It was basically a retread of Alien, expect a lesser version. Good performances though. And the visuals were amazing but I found it all style and no substance.

    • Thanks my friend.

      I really felt there was a lot more here than some. As mentioned, I like the underlying conflicts of faith versus science and curiosity versus the unknown. I didn’t really see it as a retread as much as an homage of sorts. I felt that Scott filled in several holes of the “Alien” franchise while also treading new ground.

      Now I do agree the writing gets a little too loose in the second half but I did enjoy it. You’re points certainly have merit and I know more people that share your view. But it’s a fun conversation.

      • Its good you took a lot of enjoyment from this. I did too but only on a visual level. I liked the scientific themes and theories that Scott introduced but he only brushed over them and didn’t delve as deep as I would have liked. Overall, I walked out feeling really let down.

  3. Great review! I also thought it ended up being a really fun film, but just a bit overdone maybe. You know… over-blockbustered! I’m closer to a 3.5/5, like @ilovethatfilm. But, it definitely sets something really interesting in motion for the coming films. Did you find that the 3D added much? I barely noticed it.

    • I thought the 3D was good. But then again, it did nothing to really determine my like or dislike for the movie.

      Hey thanks for checking out my review. I appreciate the words.

  4. I was disappointed, but my expectations were so high that that still left a lot of room to work with.

    Its an enjoyable, recommendable movie, but so frustrating, because a few simple tweaks could have made it great. As you said, Scott leverages the technology at his disposal to make a STUNNING looking film. I mean, wow!

    But I had some issues with some of the character choices and plot intracacies, and they all added up to me having to downgrade the movie… 😦

    Glad to hear you really liked it though!

    • Hate you didn’t enjoy it as much. I really felt Scott balanced tipping his hat to the original Alien (and Aliens) as well as other sci-fi classics and creating a new mythology. I also really liked the main characters even though a couple flirt with stereotype. But several people have had mixed feelings on it.

  5. I’m so glad you loved it bro. I did too. I don’t get all the hate. Ridley rocked my world with this movie. Great review!

  6. Pingback: 2012 K & M RANDOM MOVIE AWARDS |

  7. Pingback: THE TOP 10 FILMS OF 2012 |



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s