REVIEW: “A Good Day to Die Hard” (2013)


Going into “A Good Day to Die Hard” (a.k.a. “Die Hard 5”), I knew that I would be the guy that would take a stand against the barrage of negative reviews from critics and fellow movie blogging buddies. I was prepared to respond to those who have berated the film or labeled it a major disappointment. I was ready to let everyone know why the current 16% Rotten Tomatoes score was misguided and wrong. But I ran into a problem. I was ready and prepared to defend this film. Unfortunately I can’t. If it weren’t for the title I would have never known this was a “Die Hard” picture. “A Good Day to Die Hard” is missing almost ever signature feature and clever nuance that has made this franchise great.

There are several things that have set this franchise apart from other action films. You have the fiery personality of its wisecracking lead character. You have strong, well-defined, charismatic villains. You have solid side characters that fit perfectly in John McClane’s chaotic world. You’ll have a hard time finding a trace of any of these things in “A Good Day to Die Hard” and for me the problems all start with the writing and direction. Skip Woods wrote the screenplay which explains a lot. His last two writing credits were for the terrible “X-Men Orgins: Wolverine” and the even bigger train wreck “The A-Team”. John Moore directs and while he’s received some box office success, his resume is filled with forgettable films. Put these two together and apparently this is what we get.

die hard

The story is simple and pretty generic. John McClane (Willis) heads to Moscow after receiving news that his estranged son Jack (Jai Courtney) has been put in prison. John finds out that his son is a CIA field operative and they both find themselves in the middle of a deadly terrorist plot. A lot of the movie is spent with Willis and Courtney bouncing lazy, ham-fisted lines off each other. I grew tired of Jack’s constant whining and John is now a self-reflecting softie. This gets into one of my biggest problems with this movie. This isn’t the John McClane of the other “Die Hard” pictures. We see very little of his signature spunk and in-your-face attitude. I kept waiting for him to go off on one of the bad guys McClane style but it never happened. In fact, the closest we get to seeing that is when he punches out a motorist for getting in his face. Not one of the terrorists – a civilian!

For me, if you take away McClane’s charisma and attitude you’ve already lost a lot. Apparently Moore thought that having Willis yell and scream here and there would be enough. Not even close! But to make matters worse, McClane’s great smart-alecky humor is decimated by Woods’ poor dialogue. So many times the one-liners land with a thud and they feel cheap and artificial. He does deliver a handful of lines that did make me laugh, but nothing close to the number of great quotes from the previous movies.

It also doesn’t help that he lacks a clear and present villain to go back and forth with. Instead of showing us the bad guy and then allowing McClane to fight his way to him, this film tries to play out like a thriller by throwing several twists in along the way. That’s fine except this is “Die Hard” and this is a significant departure from the structure of the other films. The story itself isn’t terrible and they do try and make some pretty cool historical connections. But it all plays out to be pretty basic stuff and doesn’t stick nearly as well as the other movies, even 2007’s “Live Free or Die Hard”.

die hard 2

But what about the action? I mean the action is the franchise’s bread and butter right? Does it manage to save the movie. Well, yes and no. There are a couple of unbelievable action set pieces even though they seem to grow more and more unimpressive as the film moves on. Perhaps the greatest scene in the film involves a huge car chase through the heavy traffic in Moscow. The sequence has some amazing stunts but it also has an unforgivable problem. It features some of the most frustrating camerawork and editing that I have ever seen in an action film. I am not a fan of the herky-jerky handheld camera craze. Here it’s amplified x10! It’s a long scene but the quick edits rarely leave the camera on a shot for more than a second. And the few times the camera does follow a shot it’s constantly shaking or moving from one place to another. Not only does it make things indecipherable but it basically ruined the scene for me.

I know this may be simplistic thinking especially from a pseudo-critic like me, but how can you mess up when you have such a tried and true formula to use? It may not sound like it but I did find some entertainment in “A Good Day to Die Hard”. I did think there were elements to the story that were pretty cool and there were some good action moments. I also can’t help but feel a little nostalgic when it comes to John McClane. But that’s also why this one stings. This film doesn’t do the movie or the character justice. The tag team of bad writing and bad direction sink this ship and it’s a bitter pill to swallow. Some are saying it’s time to bury this franchise. No way! I want McClane to go out right. So I hope they do another movie. Just don’t let Skip Woods and John Moore anywhere near it!


34 thoughts on “REVIEW: “A Good Day to Die Hard” (2013)

  1. Just put up my review of the movie as well and I completely agree, it really was a waste of time and it disappointed me. This shouldn’t have the “Die Hard” title.

  2. I knew A Good Day To Die Hard wasn’t going to be well received but it’s gotten an onslaught of criticism. I was planning to check it out in theaters but now I think I’ll skip it. Nice review.

    • Thanks man! I’ll be perfectly honest, there’s nothing worth seeing on the big screen. I really thought there was no way all the heavy criticism could be justified. It is. In fact I’m really thinking about my 2 star rating. It may be a tad generous.

  3. I’ve been working my through the Die Hard films this week, leading up to seeing this one tonight. I’m going to go into it the same as you did, with an open mind! Though I haven’t seen one good review yet…

    Great review!

  4. Can’t argue with a thing you said Keith. Its a subpar outing, without a doubt. The action scenes are lame, and they do lose steam as they go. But the worst part of all, as you point out, is that the character of John McClane just isnt the same. He was totally lame. 😦

    • Did you find his jokes and wisecracks completely out of whack? I mean some of the things he was saying were so poorly written and were said at such weird and unusual times.

  5. Glad we’re on the same camp on this one Keith. I do like Bruce and McClane, but like you said ‘this film doesn’t do the movie or the character justice.’ I initially thought they should just put a bullet in the head of this franchise, but maybe I’ll give it another chance if they hire a decent screenwriter and director to do it right. Oh man, I miss Hans Gruber!!

  6. Thanks for the write up! Good job. I am going nowhere near this mess. It looks even worse than some Die Hard knock off’s from the past.

      • That’s too bad because with even the 2nd and the 4th being the weakest entries they are still solid action movies and they “feel” like Die Hard films. This new one just looks like a bad action flick they just happened to drop Willis right into.

  7. 100% behind you on everything. I went in wanting to chamption McClane, but just couldn’t. It made me sick in the stomach. And just like you, I actually hope this isn’t the last instalment. Why end on such a bum note?! Bring back Samuel L. Jackson for a buddy up now they’re both “older and wiser”. I’d shell out for that.

  8. I, too, wanted to believe it would be good. But they kind of worried me with the “YIPPEE-Ki-YAY-MOTHER-RUSSIA” poster–really? And now, everyone is saying don’t bother. Sad.

    I want the old John Mclane back. 😦 He revolutionized the idea of what an action hero could be–and now, he has become the caricature that he once countered. A real shame.

    Great write-up!

  9. McClane is the only reason this film made it, but for me it still made it fun. I know that everyone is disappointed with it…and with just cause. But despite the disappointment, wasted characters, and redundant plot, I still had fun watching the explosions and action. But, yep, agree…without Willis this would’ve been an absolute bust

    • I still think there’s a really, really good Die Hard movie left. Many people are saying kill a franchise. Not me. I want that one more big McClane driven picture. My fingers are crossed.

  10. And yet another review that has made me feel better about the fact that I decided against paying good money to see this film. Will wait for it to roll around to blu-ray and … well, actually, wait for it to appear on TV. Doesn’t sound like it’s worth the money at all! Sad. So very sad. I’ll just put Die Hard 1 & 2 on repeat … (wasn’t much of a fan of 3!)

    • Wise, wise decision Jaina! At first I was disappointed but I’ve grown angry. I have loved this franchise and for it to do this??? Reminds me of the Indiana Jones films. Three really good ones then several years later they put out a hunk if crap like Crystal Skulls!

  11. What is so sad about the movie and the comments here is that everyone posting seems like they really wanted the movie to be good. When people go in with an open mind and good will toward all the other Die Hard films (even the controversial “Live Free or Die Hard”) and still can’t find something nice to say, you know it’s the movie’s fault.

    • Great point! Speaking for myself I know I wanted it to be good. I really wanted to be the guy that spoke up in defense of the picture. Unfortunately I couldn’t. They really dropped the ball with this one.

  12. Pingback: 2013 K&M Random Movie Awards |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s