REVIEW: “Annabelle”

ANNABELLE POSTER

One of my favorite horror movie from recent years was 2013’s “The Conjuring”. The film was a huge success banking close to $320 million at the box office. Well obviously Hollywood wasn’t going to let that kind of success rest with just one movie. A proper sequel is scheduled for a 2016 release but in the meantime we’ve been given “Annabelle”, a prequel to “The Conjuring” and potentially a new spin-off franchise. Much like “The Conjuring”, “Annabelle” was a huge box office success raking in over $255 million against its small $6.5 million budget.

“Annabelle” starts with the exact same opening scene that we see in “The Conjuring”. It’s 1970 and three young people are telling the Warrens about their terrifying experience with a doll they believed to be possessed. The film then moves back one year and follows a handsome young couple, John and Mia Form (Ward Horton and Annabelle Wallis). They live in a nice neighborhood in Santa Monica, California and are expecting their first child. John surprises Mia with a doll she has wanted for their nursery. Apparently Mia has a weird taste in dolls because this thing is the ugliest and creepiest looking doll you’ll see.

ANNABELLE1

One night Mia is awoken by screams from their neighbor’s home. While John is checking it out a man and a crazed woman holding the doll attacks Mia. The police show up and kill the man while the woman locks herself in the nursery and commits suicide while cradling the doll in her arms. As a result of the traumatic event and some subsequent unexplained phenomena, Mia asks John to get rid of the doll. The couple have a healthy little girl named Leah, leave their troubling Santa Monica home, and move to Pasadena to start over. But while unpacking guess what they find? Yep, it’s that creepy doll that John had thrown away and as you can guess a series of terrifying occurrences follow.

“Annabelle” becomes a fairly standard mix of haunted house and possession horror. It’s pretty slow moving and it takes some time to get rolling. But when the attempted scares do come they are your garden variety creaking doors, flickering lights, and frightening figures lurking in the shadows. There are a small handful of unsettling moments but for the most part “Annabelle” just doesn’t have the frights I was hoping for. It meanders a bit too much and none of its horror elements feel original. And perhaps the biggest problem – they just aren’t that scary.

ANNABELLE

Another shortcoming is tied to the performances. I’m not a bit familiar with Annabelle Wallis or Ward Horton but neither offer much in terms of charisma. It’s not that their performances are bad. They just feel terribly generic and by-the-books. Horton and Wallis are definitely likable and they are a very attractive couple, but their relationship never feels authentic. For me there was always a constant reminder that their relationship was scripted. Again not bad performances but pretty dry and buttoned up.

“Annabelle” often teases us with what it potentially could have been. It lays out a promising premise but it never goes beyond the routine run-of-the-mill horror flick that we have seen over and over. I loved “The Conjuring” and I like the idea of having tie-ins which expand the concept. But “Annabelle” doesn’t get the job done and if it does become a franchise, I can’t see myself investing much of my time in it. Simply put, regardless of its intentions and its potential, the film doesn’t do enough. That’s a real shame.

VERDICT – 2 STARS

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “REVIEW: “Annabelle”

  1. I agree completely with this review. The Conjuring was excellent, but this felt so blah. Everything is by-the-numbers. It’s not terrible, just as you said, generic.

    • And it’s a shame, right? There are such good pieces in place but I never felt engaged. Hopefully the upcoming Conjuring sequel won’t follow the same path.

  2. Keith, I could never watch this simply because I have an irrational fear of dolls–especially the one you have selected for this post. I had a doll that size with the same blonde hair and it came up to my waist and it lived in my closet and I’d hear banging. The eyes of it freaked me out. Turns out there was a bat in the closet, but I was sure the doll was possessed and going to kill me. Pretty harrowing for an 8 year old. I can’t stand dolls. Hey, thanks for the memory trigger ;). Seriously, nice review. Sorry you were disappointed.

    • WOW! That’s a great story. Not great that you were terrified of course. At 8 years old I can see it leaving a permanent scar. This movie (even though it is terribly flawed) would be tough for you.

  3. Meh. This looks like such a disappointment, but I did not really expect much more. I still haven’t seen it, and your review convinces me I still don’t have to rush and change that!

  4. Yet another very fair review sir. Annabelle sounds like it was really rushed out before anyone had a chance to think, ‘Hey, we can make this a lot better and make it a worthy successor/prequel to a great horror.’ Everyone got too eager to ride on the back of The Conjuring’s success, and formulaic filmmaking is pretty much the quickest avenue to pumping out at least…..something.

  5. Pingback: Movie Review – Sinister 2 |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s