K&M RETRO REVIEW: “Rambo III”

rambo

“Rambo III” holds a very distinguished position within my movie history. It has the honor of being the first R-rated movie I watched in the theater. It was 1988 and I was 16 years-old. My uncle was down for the weekend and offered to take me to a movie. This was a big deal because there was no theater in my small town and going to the movies was a real treat. Being a huge fan of 80s action movie icons Schwarzenegger and Stallone, naturally I went with “Rambo III” when asked to choose. To my surprise my uncle agreed and the rest is meaningless movie history.

For me the Rambo franchise ended after “Rambo III”. Sylvester Stallone attempted to bring it back in 2008 with the profoundly mediocre and generically titled “Rambo”, but it lacked the feel and (yes I’m going to say it) the charm of the original three flicks. For me “Rambo III” is a satisfying  way to finish a testosterone-fueled, biceps-flexing, action-packed exercise that fits nicely into the over-the-top 80s action catalog.

RAMBO2

The Rambo series will never find its way onto drama school curriculums, but by this time Stallone was pretty in tune with what his character needed. The screenplay (co-written by Stallone) gives us a more grounded John Rambo (aside from the one-man-army awesomeness of course) and Stallone isn’t asked to stretch beyond the bounds of his acting abilities. For example, gone are the schmaltzy end of the movie theatrics he gives us in the first two films. Well meaning but laughably bad scenes and slightly worse acting.

But that doesn’t mean the film is free of cheese. We get plenty of it especially from Richard Crenna who delivers several lines dripping with Velvetta. My personal favorite: (speaking about Rambo) “God would have mercy. He won’t”. This goes hand-in-hand with the film’s attempt to inject a touch of humor. It tries not to take itself too seriously as evident by Rambo’s numerous jokey one-liners, some that work, some not so much.

The film starts by giving us a disillusioned Rambo who has finally found a degree of peace working at a Buddhist monastery in Thailand. His mentor and one true friend Colonel Traitman (Crenna) finds him and tries to recruit Rambo to join him on a special mission. Rooted in the politics of 1988, the mission is to deliver supplies to rebels fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. Rambo declines, Trautman goes anyway and ends up captured by a brutal Soviet officer named Zaysen (Marc de Jonge). Rambo gets word and sets out on a solo mission against all odds to rescue his friend.

RAMBO22

This bromance takes Rambo to the toughest terrain he has faced. Filmed mostly in Israel and a bit in Arizona, the locations offer themselves up to a believable setting and some great action sequences. This also may be Stallone’s most physically demanding performance of the series. Sly runs, jumps, climbs, fights, and unleashes an insane amount of carnage. In several ways he tries to outdo the second film – bigger stunts and bigger action. For me it absolutely works.

“Rambo III” was hammered hard by critics but still made good money at the box office. I can see some of the criticisms now better than before. It is loud, violent, and mindless. Also the film doesn’t have an ounce of strategy or subtlety with its political messaging. Perhaps it’s the jaws of nostalgia tightly clamped on my perspective, but I still have a ton of fun with this film. It’s lighter, the action is energetic, and the cheese adds to the experience. I was the target audience back in 1988 and I had a blast with “Rambo III”. Maybe the ability to still look at it through that lens enables me to appreciate it for exactly what it is.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

4 Stars

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “K&M RETRO REVIEW: “Rambo III”

  1. I think I’ve only seen the first Rambo, which I actually enjoyed back in the day. Funny that between Sly & Arnie, I actually watched more of Arnie’s action films but obviously Sly is actually a more versatile actor. In any case, not sure I want to watch the Rambo sequels Keith, but glad you enjoyed it 🙂

  2. I bought the complete set on blu-ray recently and watched all 4 again. I was surprised at Rambo III. While it had nowhere near the depth of First Blood or even Rambo, there was more substance to it than First Blood Part II. Like you said there is cheese there, but Stallone does give Rambo some weight here. Him and Richard Crenna do a pretty good job as a two man crew. I used to think this was the least of the series, but I think this is above First Blood Part II.

    • I like this one a lot, but I’ll admit I love part 2 as well. As I mentioned in another comment, perhaps too much nostalgia weighs in. Still I legitimately enjoy these cheese and all.

    • I haven’t written reviews on any of the other three but they would fall something like this:

      First Blood – 4
      First Blood: Part II – 4
      Rambo – 2.5

      FB part 2 is probably rated high but I fully admit the nostalgia factor for me. Long story but it was such a big thing for my friends and me when I was in Junior High school. That nostalgia factor is still with me.

  3. 4 stars for Rambo III? Who knew that was even possible, lol. This is the one movie in the franchise that I hate. Funny you say the series ends after this movie. I actually think this is the second of a trilogy. First Blood is it’s own thing while part II introduces us to Rambo the superhero and is the first of those movies. I like that part for the cheesy goodness of it, part III just didn’t work for me, at all, even back then when I was 17. On the other hand, the ’08 sequel was just so over the top ridiculous and cartoonish I loved it in a ‘so bad it’s awesome’ way. That said, I am glad it still works, no matter the reason.

    • Come on now Wendell! You’re supposed to put my mind at ease for scoring the movie that high! 😉

      I thought the ’08 film tried to get way too heavy. How on earth can a Rambo film get that dramatically and emotionally heavy? That’s one reason I really like this one. Yes you have the sturdy bromance at the center, but there is no ‘rescue the POWs’ or ‘our country is depending on you’ type weight. It does dabble in it when it talks about the Afghan rebels, but that’s what I mean by its political heavy handedness. Otherwise it is just good nostalgic fun for me.

      So, am I crazy? 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s