REVIEW: “Wolf Man” (2025)

Maybe it’s just me, but lately there seems to have been an influx of werewolf movies. This seems especially true over the past few years. Now here we are we in January and we already have our first one of the year. It’s “Wolf Man”, a Blumhouse reboot of the 1941 Lon Chaney horror classic “The Wolf Man”. This latest iteration is helmed by Leigh Whannell who impressed with 2020’s superb “The Invisible Man”.

Written by Whannell and his wife, Corbett Tuck, “Wolf Man” takes a dark and gory look at a number of themes through the lens of an old-fashioned monster movie. With a struggling family of three as its centerpiece, the story deals with such subjects as family, parenthood, troubled pasts, and clinging to one’s humanity. Interestingly (and somewhat disappointingly), there’s very little in terms of mythology or folklore. More on that in a second.

Christopher Abbott plays Blake Lovell, a writer and stay-at-home dad who lives in New York City with his wife Charlotte (Julia Garner) and their young daughter Ginger (Matilda Firth). Blake and Ginger and very close despite his tendency of being overprotective. But his relationship with Charlotte isn’t as strong. She pours a lot of time into her job as a journalist and not only has it come between her and her husband, but it has also left her feeling disconnected from Ginger.

Image Courtesy of Universal Pictures

One day Blake is notified that his estranged father, Grady (Sam Jaeger) has officially been declared dead by the state of Oregon after being missing for a long time. Grady was a survivalist living in an isolated farmhouse deep in the Oregon wilderness. Blake left that life as soon as he was old enough and he hadn’t spoken to his father since. Now his father’s homeplace has fallen to him and he needs to make a trip out west to pack up his dad’s things.

Realizing their need of some family time, Charlotte agrees to go with Blake to Oregon with hopes it will bring her closer to her husband and daughter. But it doesn’t take long for things to go bad. Less than a mile away from his father’s place, Blake swerves to avoid a strange figure standing in the middle of the road, causing him to wreck their moving truck. As they climb out of the wreckage a creature suddenly attacks, clawing Blake across the arm before they’re able to run away into the night.

The family makes it to Blake’s father’s house and lock themselves inside while the creature prowls outside looking for a way in. From there “Wolf Man” turns into a story of survival that takes place over the course of that one harrowing night. As its title suggests, the creature is indeed a ‘wolf-man’ and it quickly becomes obvious that Blake is infected with whatever animal-borne disease it is carrying. His symptoms start light but quickly turn more grotesque as he begins to change right before his frightened family’s eyes.

The movie chronicles the family’s fight to survive the night, not only from the creature outside the house but also the one within. Though not as metaphorically rich as “The Invisible Man”, there is still plenty of symbolism in the material. The rest is just good old genre fun. The baked-in tension is accompanied by a healthy amount of gore which fits well with the creature’s ravenous brutality. And then there’s Blake’s painful transformation which is captured practically through the prosthetics and makeup wizardry of effects designer Arjen Tuiten.

Image Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Again there’s no traditional Wolf Man mythology to speak of. There is no full moon, no silver bullets, no fur-covered body. In fact there’s not much information at all outside of some brief and scant opening script. The film’s infection angle has its benefits but it can also seem like a shortcut which (for better or worse) allows Whannell to focus on other things. Overall it works, but it would have been nice to have a little more background into something so primally and terrifyingly transformative.

As is often the case with so many movies like this, not all of the character choices make sense. In “Wolf Man” some are downright baffling. Yet we still find ourselves invested in this family’s plight, partly due to Whannell never letting us lose sight of their familial bond. It’s also aided by great performances from Abbott, Garner, and Firth. And though most of it takes place in the dark of night, we still get some stunning Oregon scenery that helps creates an isolated setting that’s both beautiful and forbidding.

As it is, “Wolf Man” doesn’t break the mold but it doesn’t exactly embrace it either. It lands somewhere in between, working best as pure genre entertainment with a few compelling themes on its mind. It’s not a movie that will stick in your memory. But it’s well made and noticeably better than the slew of recent werewolf movies that have come our way. “Wolf Man” is now showing exclusively in theaters.

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

10 thoughts on “REVIEW: “Wolf Man” (2025)

  1. was curious about this until I saw the unknown cast,

    its interesting how many good attempts have been made at producing a good werewolf movie.

    There was Wolfman with Benicio del toro. Then there was the Underworld series which is inspired by Myth. then of course the Twilight series . but none of them really reach full potential of being a classic.

    The best attempt might have been Silver Bullet. Any thoughts on this Keith ?

  2. Freakin loved his Invisible Man. My anticipation for this definitely got tempered after reviews came out. Will check it out later in the year though. Sounds like Whannell should swing for original fare again instead of updating Universal’s monsters library?

    • I personally think the reviews have been overly harsh. It certainly has some issues and it doesn’t match “The Invisible Man”. But I had a good time with it. And I really like the way it’s shot.

Leave a reply to Adrian Manuel Cancel reply