First Glance: “The Intruder” Trailer

INTRUDERposter

Over the past few days we looked at the trailers for “Ma” and “Greta”. Here is the third 2019 movie featuring a unexpected actor/actress playing a creepy terrorizing nutcase. This time it’s Dennis Quaid who plays the psychopath. In this eerie looking psychological thriller a young couple buys a country home only to find the past owner (Quaid) hasn’t quite let it go.

Intruder1

The first trailer has a pretty twisted vibe to it and it’s a hoot watching the freaky wild-eyed Quaid come unhinged. Let’s hope this effective trailer translates to an even more effective feature length film.

“The Intruder” hits theaters May 3rd. Check out the trailer below and let me know you will be seeing it or giving it a pass.

REVIEW: “Paddleton”

PaddletonPOSTER

I always have time for a Mark Duplass movie. And while not all of his films land as firmly as they could, the ones that do always manage to pull me in. I’ve always appreciated his aversion to big Hollywood formula. His movies operate on a small budget, tend to be short but economical, and usually have a warm and intimate center. That definitely holds true for his latest (and the first film in his new exclusive deal with Netflix) “Paddleton”.

The movie begins with Michael (Mark Duplass) getting test results from his doctor which reveal a large mass in his stomach. His fears are proven true after seeing an oncologist – he has terminal cancer. Unable to bear the thought of hospitals, radiation and side effects, he chooses a controversial alternative to chemotherapy – a prescription that essentially helps a cancer patient end their life before the disease does.

Paddleton1

Michael seeks the help of his neighbor and best friend Andy (Ray Romano) to help him go through with it. The buddies are like two peas in a pod – kinda homely and a tad eccentric. They have longstanding traditions of watching Kung fu movies, cooking pizzas, and putting together puzzles. Oh, and then there’s Paddleton, a racquetball-like game they made up and play together at an abandoned drive-in theater.

The closest pharmacy willing to fill the prescription is in a small tourist town some six hours away. So Michael and Andy head out on a road trip made up of quirky conversations, an ostrich farm, a dryly hilarious pharmacist named David (Kadeem Hardison) and meditations on their favorite movie “Death Punch”. But more importantly it opens up these two characters and the endearing and routinely funny friendship at the core of the film.

Romano is just the right fit to play Andy, an insecure worrywart by nature with a disdain for smalltalk (and for David), yet he’s undeniably tender-hearted and quietly devastated by his friend’s plight. Duplass is just as good playing a variation of the comedy straight man. His Michael is a tad more level-headed but not without his own peculiarities.

Paddleton2

Duplass and Romano have a sharp, witty chemistry and what makes it stand out most is their improvisation. Duplass’ script offers plenty of room for the two stars to play off each other and director Alex Lehmann is smart enough to let them. It’s not surprising since Duplass and Lehmann did the same thing in 2016’s “Blue Jay”, an underseen drama/comedy featuring its own healthy dose of improv.

The film’s early playfulness all but disappears in its final 20 minutes as “Paddleton” blindsided us with an emotionally earnest and deeply affecting ending. It left me looking at the film as a whole through an entirely different lens. I’ve seen it a second time now and the themes of loneliness, friendship, and mortality stand out even more profoundly now. I get why a lot of people won’t be as enamored with “Paddleton” as I am. But what can I say? I’m an unabashed fan of its simplicity, its humor, and its heart.

VERDICT – 4.5 STARS

4-5-stars

Random Thoughts: The 2019 Oscars

random

I’m pretty sure I said the same thing last year – I do love Oscar season. But my excitement for this year’s big Hollywood bash was as low as it has been for years. Last year it was due to the absolute predictability of every major category. The lack of suspense proved to be a killer.

This year’s s actually offered up some genuine intrigue. The problem I had was with the Academy’s glaring snubs and ludicrous omissions. And the batch of Best Picture nominations were far from great (only one of the films made my top 20). Still, I’m a sucker for the show and I went in with my fingers crossed. Could Oscar overcome the series of goof-ups leading up to this year’s broadcast? To be honest, it wasn’t terrible. Here are a few random thoughts.

  • Turns out the ‘No Host’ approach wasn’t too bad. In fact, I would MUCH rather jam out to Queen and Adam Lambert than sit through another aggressively mediocre stand-up routine.
  • Actually I think the Academy showed you could do a show without a host. And it definitely seemed to make it go by quicker.
  • I’m still trying to figure out how “Won’t You Be My Neighbor” didn’t even get a documentary nomination! I guess cramming Fred Rogers into that opening montage was supposed to suffice?
  • “Green Book” took home Best Picture setting many on social media ablaze. Personally I’m fine with it winning especially considering the so-so batch of movies the Academy nominated this year (with the exception of “Roma”).
  • Speaking of “Roma”, I think it is by far the best film of the eight Best Picture nominees. But I put this out several times leading up to the show – would “Roma” winning Best Foreign Language Film cut into its votes for Best Picture? It’s seems a possibility.
  • Or are Academy voters simply not ready to give a Netflix movie its biggest prize? 🤔
  • “Green Book” is the first film since “Argo” to win Best Picture while not being nominated for Best Director. It’s only the fifth time it has happened in the Academy’s 90-year history.

OSCARSCuaron

  • Alfonso Cuarón (“Roma”) won well deserved Oscars for Best Director and Best Cinematography. The Academy definitely got these categories right (sorry Spike).
  • I know some people don’t care for the In Memoriam segments but I do. This year’s featured some toughies – Reynolds, Finney, Marshall, Lee, etc.
  • Jason Momoa and Helen Mirren presenting together. Simply epic!
  • I loved Regina King’s win for Supporting Actress and her acceptance speech was amazing. You have to love pure, genuine, heartfelt emotion.
  • “Vice” wins for Best Makeup, the one and only category that it remotely deserved to be nominated for.
  • By the way, someone may want to check. The makeup winners may still be trying to read that piece of paper they had.
  • “Black Panther” gets big wins in Costume Design and Production Design. No arguments here.
  • Mahershala Ali is now a two-time Oscar winner. I’m okay with him winning for Supporting Actor, but I still see him as a co-lead in “Green Book”.
  • “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” wins Best Animated Feature. It’s a good movie but hardly a great one. I would have went with “Isle of Dogs”.
  • “First Man” won for Special Effects. It deserved so much more but I guess we’ll take what we can get. Not sure why the film didn’t resonate with the Academy. I adore it.
  • Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga absolutely crushed it with “Shallow”. It was utterly heart-melting and one of the best Oscar night performances I’ve seen.
  • How many times did ABC go to commercial breaks saying “And coming up Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper sing Shallow live”? Can’t really blame them. If you’re starved for viewers you want to hold your mainstream attraction as long as you can. Still, its obviousness was pretty funny.
  • And of course “Shallow” won for Best Original Song. I mean who in their right mind would have voted against it?

OscarCooperGaga

  • I do love that When a Cowboy Trades His Spurs for Wings was nominated. I don’t like country music but that song was such a perfect fit for that “Buster Scruggs” scene. I’m not sure if the live performance translated that well though.
  • I don’t even remember the score from “Black Panther” yet it wins for Best Original Score. I’m still chapped that “First Man” wasn’t even nominated despite some big (and deserved) wins leading up.
  • It seems Spike Lee wasn’t much into humility or sportsmanship. It started in a pre-show interview where he went on about how he should have already won an Oscar. And apparently he threw a little fit in the theater when his film lost Best Picture to “Green Book”.
  • Ever the complainer, Lee continued in the Oscar press room by saying “Every time somebody’s driving somebody, I lose,” and “I thought I was court-side at the Garden and the ref made a bad call.” 🙄 Give it a rest Spike.
  • Olivia Colman gets the surprise Best Actress win for “The Favourite”. It’s a nice performance but nothing that especially stands out. Her acceptance speech though – funny, sweet, and full of surprise and joy.
  • Speaking of “The Favourite”, it went in as one of the most nominated films but left with the one lone statue. I’m okay with that. Not a big fan.
  • I thought Glenn Close had Best Actress in the bag. But to be honest, I felt what Lady Gaga did in “A Star is Born” was more impressive than either Close or Colman.
  • Willem Dafoe was so much fun to listen to in the pre-shows. We all knew he wouldn’t win but I’m so glad he was there. Genuine appreciation and enthusiasm.
  • How could you not laugh at Melissa McCarthy and Brian Tyree Henry. Definitely the right choices for presenting Costume Design. Those bunnies….

McCarthy Tyree

  • I have to admit to being happy that “Vice” fell short on screenplay, editing, director, and Best Picture. How it was even nominated ahead of so many far more deserving films still blows my mind.
  • Who else loved Mike Myers and Dana Carvey introducing “Bohemian Rhapsody”? It was the “Wayne’s World” reunion I never thought I needed.
  • Rami Malek took home Best Actor, another win that sent social media in a tizzy. I actually didn’t mind Malek’s performance. But let’s be honest, he was the least deserving out of the nominees. I would pair him with Bale, but Dafoe, Mortensen, and Cooper were all considerably better.
  • I don’t claim to be a fashion aficionado, but some of the style from last night…nope.
  • It’s kinda funny watching so much outrage over who won and who lost. It’s not as if the Oscars have the best record when it comes to picking winners. The best thing to do is just enjoy the focus on movies, root when you have a favorite nominated, and don’t be surprised when another movie wins. Oscar night is a lot more fun that way.

So that does it for another Oscar ceremony and another awards season. So what did you think? Let me know your thoughts in the comments section below. Let’s do it again next year.

First Glance: “Greta” Trailer

Greta1

A couple of days ago I showed the trailer for “Ma”. The second 2019 movie featuring an unexpected actor/actress playing a creepy horror movie nutcase is “Greta” and it stars none other than Isabelle Huppert. This thing looks absolutely nuts (and that’s intended as a compliment).

Huppert looks to be having a blast playing a lonely French piano teacher turned raving psychopath and Chloë Grace Moretz plays the object of her mad obsession. These types of films can go either way, but I’m pretty intrigued.

“Greta” opens soon – March 1st to be exact. Check out the trailer below and let me know if you’ll be checking it out or giving it a pass.

REVIEW: “High Flying Bird”

BIRDposter

I have to admit I’ve always been a sucker for a good sports movie. Or course the key word is ‘good’. To be honest it’s a film genre that has had more than its share of hard-to-watch stinkers. But when one of these movies hits its mark, regardless of the sport it’s centered around, I’m usually quick to sing its praises.

Steven Soderbergh is the latest to walk the line between a good sports movie and a crappy one. His latest film “High Flying Bird” works from a screenplay by Tarell Alvin McCraney and is loosely based on the 2011 NBA lockout. As a filmmaker who likes to tackle a variety of subjects in a variety of different ways, this is a movie right up Soderbergh’s alley.

HIGH FLYING BIRD

André Holland plays Ray Burke, an industry-wise sports agent working hard to calm his antsy rookie client Erick (Melvin Gregg) during the NBA’s lockout. Ray knows the ins and outs of the business and the longer the work stoppage the deeper it digs into his own pockets. In some ways he resembles Tom Cruise’s Jerry McGuire – headstrong, ambitious, and confident. But Ray is far more cerebral and grounded in the real world.

 

Ray knows the stakes and he feels the pressure from both his client and his agency. With neither side of the labor dispute budging and negotiations at a standstill, Ray knows he has to do something. He begins by stealthily recruiting a former assistant (Zazie Beetz). He then starts tapping into his connections with the player’s union rep (Sonja Sohn) and the slick-as-silk spokesman for the owners (Kyle MacLachlan). With all the moxie he can muster, Ray puts together a plan that could either end the lockout or his career.

“High Flying Bird” is a very different kind of basketball movie. Soderbergh is much more interested in the business side of the sport than what happens on the court. You also get the sense Soderbergh is intrigued by the racial dynamic between white ownership and the star-studded predominantly black player base. And does he want us to see a real-world reflection in the NBA’s revenue sharing structure? He plays with these ideas without beating us over the head with them – just enough to prod us to think.

This is also the second straight film Soderbergh has shot on an iPhone (the first being last year’s “Unsane” with Claire Foy). It’s a fascinating technique that offers him some obvious freedoms which we see through camera angles, how some shots are framed, and even in how he uses lighting. Just as obvious are the limitations. By necessity most of Soderbergh’s camera craftiness is restricted to closed spaces and in how he shoots characters and conversations. Still it doesn’t undercut the movie’s value as a remarkable piece of minimalist filmmaking.

HIGH FLYING BIRD

“High Flying Bird” has so many things going for it. I can’t say enough about McCraney’s dense Sorkin-esque dialogue. And let me be clear, there is a ton of dialogue. But it works because McCraney and his characters all have something of value to say. And while it may be a tad too wordy, we get a keen insight into who these people are and what makes them tick. You also have a fantastic cast. Holland shows genuine leading man chops while every supporting role feels true to their world (I haven’t even mentioned Bill Duke who is great playing a wise father-figure to Ray).

And then you have Soderbergh, an eclectic filmmaker ever willing to dabble in any genre and toy around with any and all cinematic forms. Here he directs, edits, and shoots his movie while wisely leaning heavily on a robust script and some good performances. It may end up being a little too talky for some people. But for others who appreciate an audacious filmmaker who is impossible to pigeonhole, Netflix has a good one for you.

VERDICT –  4 STARS

4-stars

REVIEW: “Hunter Killer” (2018)

HUNTERbig

Am I the only one waiting for Gerard Butler to have that Matthew McConaughey-like renaissance? You know, where he lands that one movie that taps back into the talent that we once saw glimpses of before the cavalcade of hard-to-digest slop started churning out? Well, I hate to say it but “Hunter Killer” ain’t it.

Gerry Butler’s movies have almost become an absurd event for me. I would be lying if I didn’t admit to getting some type of weird entertainment value out of them. They’re routinely bad and always offer some level of goofiness to laugh at (most of the time unintentionally). “Hunter Killer” take a different approach. It nearly drowns in its own self-seriousness. That being said, here’s something funny – “Hunter Killer” isn’t as bad as it has every right to be.

HUNTER1

Now let’s not get carried away. This isn’t the movie that puts Butler back on track. Simply put, it’s impossible to take any part of this three-pronged story seriously. And the further you go the more you realize that it’s doing nothing that you haven’t seen many, many times before.

After a United States submarine suspiciously disappears in arctic waters, first-time Commander Joe Glass (Butler) is ordered to investigate. He takes the USS Arkansas and his new crew to do some deep seas super-sleuthing. Not only does he discover the fate of the U.S. sub but he stumbles upon a sunken Russian sub that has been sabotaged from the inside. Among its lone survivors is a dignified Russian Admiral played by Michael Nyqvist.

HUNTER2

Meanwhile a four-man Navy SEAL team covertly airdrops into Russia where they are to secretly observe the goings-on at a suspicious Russian naval base. Their reconnaissance uncovers a coup led by a wild-eyed defense minister (Mikhail Gorevoy), so cartoony he could have been pulled from a late 80s comic book.

The third thread of this story takes place at the Pentagon where government officials scramble to make sense of all the intel pouring in from the Arkansas and the SEAL team. Gary Oldman grabs a quick paycheck as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs while a stone-faced Common plays an Admiral with the emotional depth of a block of wood. Linda Cardellini gets a thankless role as a security advisor. Their roles consist of expressing various levels of concern as highly dramatic music looms in the background.

HUNTER3

Nothing in this three-story structure works particularly well on its own. You’ll have a hard time finding an original idea or interesting character in any of the scenarios. But when they all come together it does offer up some mindless entertainment. The pacing is good (which is probably a smart thing) and there are a handful of good action sequences that injects a little welcomed energy. We also get another good performance from the late Michael Nyqvist. It’s one of his final roles.

But despite my ability to squeeze a little enjoyment out of “Hunter Killer”, it’s still a movie that sinks more than swims. Pretty much every thing it does is by the numbers and while some of the casting may catch your eye, they’re more or less doing the same – checking boxes and offering up the best super-serious mugging they can muster.

VERDICT – 2 STARS

2-stars