
It feels as if Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” runs the risk of facing two different knee-jerk responses, each driven by contrasting views of current events. The angry and cynical-minded folks, who look for politics in everything they watch, might see the film as an dire reflection of a dubious America and an urgent call to action. The equally angry but more defensive crowd, who want to excise politics from everything they call entertainment, might dismiss it as another vain expression of Hollywood’s growing disdain for the country. Whatever.
But then there’s a third contingent – the PTA faithful, whose love for Anderson’s movies transcends politics or worldviews. They find their happy place in everything PTA does and often grade his movies on a curve. For me, there’s a level of self-indulgence that can often plague PTA’s filmmaking and storytelling. It’s an issue that’s noticeable (and by extension, frustrating) in some films more than others. At the same time, Anderson has made one of the greatest movies of our time with “There Will Be Blood”. And the sheer genius of “Phantom Thread” can’t be overstated.
So what to make of Anderson’s latest, “One Battle After Another”? Inspired by Thomas Pynchon’s 1990 novel “Vineland”, this proudly defiant and slightly neurotic concoction has more stuffing than a Thanksgiving turkey. At times it wants to be an action movie. At other times a bonkers black comedy. It even shoots for being a thoughtful daddy-daughter drama. But more than anything it’s a surprisingly one-the-nose political jaunt that only sees our modern times through one restricted lens. And in its desperate efforts to ‘say something’ at every turn, it forsakes simple things like character building and narrative cohesion.

The movie’s problems start early and pretty much persist for the duration of the film’s lengthy 160 minutes. First there’s Anderson’s struggle with juggling his film’s abject absurdity and finger-wagging seriousness. The lines frequently blur together, making it too preposterous to be taken seriously and too serious and self-important to be funny. Then there’s Anderson’s chaotic storytelling which bounces us from one point the next while rarely slowing down to let anything develop organically.
The film opens with an extended prologue where we’re introduced to the French 75, a domestic terrorist group hiding behind the gentler title of “revolutionaries”. They’re a sundry yet organized faction with plenty of weapons and all the favorite hashtagged anti-establishment slogans. They blow up buildings, rob banks, and invade outposts (with very little condemnation), all under the emotionally charged leadership of Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor). She has a relatively small amount of screen time, but she ends up driving much of the story in some really bizarre ways.
Perfidia is tough as nails and extremely dedicated to her radical cause. But as we watch, Anderson seems conflicted on how to portray her. For the most part he’s smitten to the point of venerating her despite her unhinged antics which don’t always make sense. Look no further than her wacky first encounter with one of the more ridiculous characters of the year, Colonel Steven Lockjaw (Sean Penn). During a raid on a detention center, Perfidia apprehends Lockjaw. Her bizarre actions trigger some weird psychosexual infatuation within him that sets his course for the remainder of the movie.
The bulk of the story unfolds 16 years later with Perfidia long gone, leaving her tag-along lover and former French 75 member, Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio) to raise their daughter Willa (Chase Infiniti). A teenager now, Willa spends more time looking after her perpetually paranoid and stoned father than enjoying her high school years. But their lives are rattled when Bob gets word that Lockjaw has discovered their location. Still driven by his twisted (and quite baffling) obsession with Perfidia, Lockjaw gives orders to kill Bob on sight and take Willa alive.

From there Anderson bops across his vision of America with the Bob-Perfidia-Lockjaw triangle in tow. As he does, his heroes are helped by an assortment of allies including a karate teacher who moonlights as a Harriet Tubman for illegal migrants (Benicio del Toro), a former French 75 loyalist (Regina Hall), and a convent of pot-growing nuns. As for PTA’s villains, they’re all very bad and very white. They range from cops, soldiers, and congressmen to the Christmas Adventurers Club, a cartoonishly silly and shallow white supremacist outfit so weakly sketched they would’ve been better left on the cutting room floor.
As for the talent-rich cast, no one is given much room to deliver a truly great performance. DiCaprio is the biggest victim, spending the film’s first half developing a unique and intriguing character only to spend the rest of his time frantically running around and clownishly yelling into oblivion. Del Toro is briefly terrific but is firmly handcuffed to Bob’s erratic story. As for Penn, he does what he’s asked. Sadly for him it results in nothing more than a farcical one-note caricature who’s too vile to be funny and too ludicrous to be menacing. The true bright spots come from Infiniti’s strong feature debut, and Hall who routinely grounds the film in some semblance of reality.
“One Battle After Another” is the kind of movie custom-made for an awards season push. It’s certain to be heralded as a modern “masterpiece”, an “important” film, an “essential” movie of our time, etc. Frankly, it’s none of those things, falling well short of PTA’s finer works. There are a couple of well-staged car chases and an invigorating score from Jonny Greenwood. But the film is 160 minutes of unfocused energy, fueled by plot gimmicks, careless romanticizations, and pulpit pounding that takes lazy potshots at real-world issues rather than actually examining them.
VERDICT – 2 STARS



















