REVIEW: “42”

42 poster

I am a huge baseball fan and I’ve always been drawn to a good baseball movie. Unlike any other sport, baseball has the history, the personalities, and the spirit which are perfect ingredients for a good sports movie. For years we’ve seen baseball movies that focus on everything from the sport’s history, inspirational true stories, hilarious locker room comedies, and spirited fantasy pictures. The newest one to join the bunch is “42”. It’s the story of Jackie Robinson and his breaking of the color barrier which opened the door for black baseball players to play in Major League Baseball.

I mentioned inspirational, it’s hard to find a more inspirational story than this one. While this is the story of Jackie Robinson, a large part of the movie focuses on Branch Rickey, the president and general manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers. In the film Rickey (Harrison Ford) decides to shake things up in the world of baseball by bringing a black player into the all white league. With the 1946 season ahead, Ricky knows that the backlash will be severe but he believes it’s the right thing not just for baseball but for his bottom line. He believes he’s found his man in Jackie Robinson (Chadwick Boseman) – a tough kid who Rickey believes can handle the pressures that are sure to come.

42 3

Jackie is brought from the Negro League to play for the Montreal Royals, Brooklyn’s farm team. The movie then follows his eventual rise to the big leagues while documenting the many struggles and hardships he faced in a segregated and racially divided America. Writer and director Brian Helgeland doesn’t gloss over the uncomfortable racism of the time which is something that gives Jackie’s story such a sense of significance and importance. It makes his endurance and accomplishment all the more profound.

I also appreciated how Helgeland showed people on both sides of the racial line willing to look past the peripheral façades in order to see and accomplish a greater good. But of course it was Jackie who bore the brunt of the abuse and it was his strength of character and perseverance that ultimately made the difference. The film also does a great job of recreating the mid-1940s. The clothes, uniforms, and neighborhoods all brim with a pitch-perfect period feel. And seeing Ebbets Field recreated full of energy and life was spectacular.

Boseman gives a really nice performance. In movies like this actors will often take an opportunity to overact which tends to heighten the performance while lowering the material. That’s not the case here. Boseman remains surprisingly restrained even during more emotional scenes. I was also struck by how much he resembled Robinson, not so much in the off the field scenes but during the baseball games. There were four or five glimpses on the field where I would have sworn there was CGI trickery involved.

42 2

And then there’s Harrison Ford, fake eyebrows, gravely voice, and all. It took me a couple of minutes to adjust to his performance, but in no time I was completely sold on his character. It’s such a great role and Ford knocks it out of the park (pun most certainly intended). Ford and Boseman are the most notables but there is some good supporting work worth mentioning. I really liked Christopher Meloni as manger Leo Durocher. Unfortunately his role is a pretty small one. I also liked Nicole Beharie as Jackie’s wife Rachel. And then the baseball guy in me really enjoyed watching Lucas Black as Pee Wee Reese. Granted, sometimes the material he’s given is pretty flimsy but he’s still a lot of fun.

All of these things help make “42” a good movie despite a few issues I have with it. I was really hoping the movie would be able to avoid many of the common trappings that biopics fall into. Now I knew Jackie’s story so I wasn’t expecting a huge surprise. But I  was hoping for more than the obvious and conventional finale we’re given. I won’t go into detail but everything neatly falls into place and the movie gives the emotionally uplifting ending it aims for. You can see it coming a mile away.

42 1

I also had to roll my eyes at several injected scenes meant for either dramatic effect or to shed light on the racism of the day. It stands out because in several other scenes “42” shows the racism of the day in much more potent and effective ways. But then you get Alan Tudyk as Phillies manager Ben Chapman. History bears witness that Chapman was a bad guy and his actions, especially against Jackie Robinson, were deplorable. But here he almost comes across as a cartoon character. He gets to the heart of what actually happened but I had a hard time buying into him.

Still this is a solid baseball movie based on an incredible story of courage and perseverance. I also couldn’t help but feel that giddy baseball fan excitement well up inside of me as I watched it. There’s a great sense of love for the game and a sensitive respectfulness for the subject matter found in “42”. And while it’s not a perfect film, it’s yet another example of how this great sport is fertile ground for quality storytelling.


27 thoughts on “REVIEW: “42”

  1. Pingback: 42 Review: Away Down South in Brooklyn | Rorschach Reviews

  2. Great review! I see a lot of reviews on this, I think I might check it out. Baseball is a nonentity in my country, but I know it is a big thing in the States especially (lots of movies, lots of references :P).

    • Thanks! I appreciate it. It’s a good movie. I do think it could’ve been better but it still does a lot of things right. It’s worth checking out for sure.

      Thanks for commenting!

  3. Good review Keith. It’s obvious and a tad corny at times, but still feels nice and right, given the true-story at hand here. Not perfect, but still worth a watch if you love Jackie’s story.

  4. Baseball transfers well to film. Moneyball was pretty good as were many about it. I wonder if this will get a release in ‘blighty’ but as a non-america but a lover of all things American I have always enjoyed a good old Baseball movie, would love to take in a game one day too, Ice Hockey also.

    • I’ve loved baseball since I was a little boy. In fact in two weeks my son and I are doing a boys trip to see two big-league games. We try to go every year and we have a blast.

    • Thanks man. Yes those moments took me out of the movie whenever they popped up. Some were so contrived. But as a whole the movie is very effective and I think it can be used to show an entire generation what Robinson went through.

  5. I’m not a baseball fan but I will definitely rent this because of the historical aspect. I could see that it would be overly melodramatic, but I was a sucker for films like Rudy where it’s about the underdog, so I think I’ll enjoy this one, Keith!

    • It’s definitely worth a watch. In fact I’m anxious to see it again myself. I am with you, melodrama isn’t always a bad thing. The only problem here are that a handful of scenes are so blatantly contrived. They almost don’t even feel like they’re part of the the rest of this movie. But aside from those moments the movie really does a good job of relaying the racial tensions most of the time. It’s a very respectful and earnest film. I think you’ll enjoy it.

  6. Pingback: Oblivion, the Lammy Awards | filmhipster

  7. Pingback: Oblivion, the Lammy Awards and a little Filth | filmhipster

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s