
I was sold on seeing “Conclave” just by the sheer force of its cast. Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow, and Isabella Rossellini instantly put the film on my radar. But for me the biggest draw was Edward Berger, the director, co-writer, and producer of the 2022 Academy Award-winning masterpiece “All Quiet on the Western Front”. Whatever the acclaimed filmmaker delivered as his next feature would be an instant must-see.
“Conclave” is an absorbing thriller that’s fueled by powerhouse performances and driven by a filmmaker who maintains an assured grip until he loses it in the final ten minutes. The film is a mostly captivating experience, frustrated only by a curveball ending so out of left field that it derails the near perfection that came before it. It’s a wild final swing that is little more than an eleventh-hour plot device, desperately aiming to be provocative, but too underdeveloped to be anything other than outrageous.
“Conclave” is based on the 2016 international best-selling novel of the same name by Robert Harris. For the majority of its time, screenwriter Peter Straughan’s adaptation plays like a high-stakes political thriller. It’s cloaked in mystery with several big reveals, some unexpected twists, and a lingering sense of paranoia. You can’t help but be sucked in by this ecclesiastical potboiler set within the hallowed halls of the Vatican.

The movie opens with Cardinal Thomas Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes) arriving at the Vatican after getting word the pope has suddenly died. After carrying out the ceremonial rites, the throne is officially declared vacant. From there, Father Lawrence is tasked with overseeing the papal conclave – a gathering in Rome of Cardinals from around the world for the purpose of electing a new pope.
From the first moment we meet him it’s obvious that Cardinal Lawrence isn’t thrilled with his responsibility. We learn he has recently struggled with a crisis of faith leading to his desire to resign from his position and leave Rome. At the same time, he also proves himself to be the most qualified and capable person to handle such a significant task. Fiennes commands the screen yet works with a necessary restraint. His weary eyes and burdened gaze gives us a good look into his tired and troubled soul.
Soon after the cardinals are sequestered and the process begins, four frontrunners arise. There’s Cardinal Bellini (Stanley Tucci), a staunch liberal pretending to be uninterested but with a clear desire for the papacy; Cardinal Tedesco (Sergio Castellitto), a conservative caricature with hardline views that some feel would set the church back decades; Cardinal Adeyemi (Lucian Msamati), a Nigerian archbishop who quickly emerges as the favorite; and Cardinal Tremblay (John Lithgow), a politically savvy American bishop whose every action is driven by his ambition to be the next pontiff.

After none receive the required two-thirds majority, a second vote is held followed by a third and a fourth. Tensions rise as the candidates posture for position, use internal politics to their advantage, and in some cases resort to underhanded tactics to compromise their competition. Caught in the middle is Cardinal Lawrence who must navigate the accusations and potential scandals to ensure the integrity of the process. And what’s with the arrival of Cardinal Benitez (Carlos Diehz), the archbishop of Kabul who was secretly appointed by the late pontiff?
Berger goes to great lengths to make his film look as authentic as possible, recreating with painstaking detail everything from the Vatican’s ornate interiors to the vibrant priestly regalia. Meanwhile Stéphane Fontaine’s cinematography and Volker Bertelmann’s score add think layers of tension as the story progresses. And it all builds our anticipation for what should be a rich and juicy finish. But instead “Conclave” ends with a whimper, throwing in a last-second twist that’s given no buildup and has no notable narrative or dramatic connection to anything that preceded it.
For 110 minutes “Conclave” is hands-down one of the year’s best movies. Unfortunately its final 10 minutes turns it into one of the year’s most frustrating misfires. The ensemble is top-notch, the production design is stellar, the behind the scenes wrangling is riveting, and Berger’s direction is methodical and propulsive. It makes the film’s unraveling all the more discouraging. Rather than ending with a bang, “Conclave” is given a lazy, patronizing finish built more on sanctimonious intentions than good moviemaking judgements.
VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

Lol s bunch of godless people in an antiquated and biting and inconsequential city. I’m British so maybe this is self loathing? But fuck these idiots and didn’t the LA archdiocese just settle a lawsuit for $820+ bn recently for diddling a bunch of boys?
I’ll wait for this on streaming. I do love the actors in this film but I’d rather wait for something more interesting like Anora and The Brutalist.
This was among the year’s best films until the final ten minutes. It completely botched its ending.
I’m extremely pumped for The Brutalist. A bit less so for Anora.
I’ll pass, Papal drama not my thing and being disappointed at the ending doesn’t scream ‘watch me’ either.
I was surprised at how tense and propulsive it was. But my goodness…that ending is such an outrageous reach.
am looking forward to this. now am curious about those outrageous last ten minutes because i don’t mind the idea of movies having twists and curveballs.
Oh I love good twists and curveballs. And there are several along the way. But the attempt to land with a bang really fell flat for me. And cramming it into such a short time didn’t help. But up until then, it was terrific.
one movie about a similar situation was Angels and Demons. not a perfect film, but underrated i think. and a great twist
The movie was great until the end. It was a slap in the face to an honor tradition. The ending ruins the whole beauty of the film.
Yep. The ending was utterly baffling.
I personally loved this movie. It was definitely a slow burner at times, and I think one or two storytelling elements could’ve been expanded upon, but it is definitely a character driven movie and the ensemble cast do a great job in providing some high-quality performances. Fiennes was excellent in the lead role. Plus, the score was quite phenomenal.
I loved it until the final 15 minutes which (to me) felt like a twist pulled out of thin air. I didn’t feel anything leading up to it gave the twist any validity whatsoever. It derailed what would have been a Top 10 movie for me.
I watched it tonight, motivated to watch it by current events. I thought maybe it was just me, but agree that ending just threw a monkey wrench into everything that went ahead before. Quite a good movie until then.
I feel the same way. Up till that out-of-the-blue “twist” at the end, the movie was easily making my Top 10. I was stunned by how much air it lost.
Oop, went before, not “ahead before”. Ack.