If there ever was a 2023 movie that seems to have flown under many radars it would have to be “The Creator”. This ambitious science-fiction action thriller crept up with little fanfare yet left a significant impression with its eye-popping trailers. Now it’s in theaters and what we‘ve been given borders on extraordinary. This is a movie built around a bold original vision that begs to be experienced on the biggest screen available. Hopefully it finds a well-deserved audience.
“The Creator” is the brainchild of director and co-writer Gareth Edwards, the mind behind 2014’s “Godzilla” and 2016’s “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story”. This time he has stepped away from franchise movies and created something entirely his own – a thoughtfully conceived and incredibly well-crafted sci-fi epic brought to screen through a true visionary’s lens. Not everything clicks into place (more on that later), but as a whole it’s pretty remarkable.
Storywise “The Creator” does what some of the best science-fiction movies do – it opens up and examines real-life current-day issues. In this case it’s several things including the growing AI debate. Visually it’s a breathtaking spectacle – an $80 million movie that looks ten-times better than most of the $200 million features we have gotten this year. Together they combine for some spectacular world building, immersing us in an enthralling war-torn dystopia that shrewdly combines the influences of “Blade Runner”, “District 9”, and even “Platoon” among many others.
Set in 2065, Earth has found itself on the brink. Robots created with hi-tech artificial intelligence gained independent thought and over time grew more advanced, even donning the faces of humans who have donated their likenesses. They’ve sought to assimilate into human society. But after a robot allegedly detonated a nuclear warhead in Los Angeles, incinerating nearly one million people, AI were banned in the West. As robots were being rounded up and destroyed, many fled to New Asia where AI manufacturing remained legal. There they built an army and soon they were at war with the West.
John David Washington plays Sgt. Joshua Taylor, an American special forces operative who we first meet on an undercover mission behind enemy lines in New Asia. He’s tasked with discovering the identity and whereabouts of Nirmata, the mysterious and inspiring leader of the AI. During his mission he fell in love and married Maya (Gemma Chan), a human ally to the robots who is pregnant with his child. But after a premature assault by American forces, Maya and their unborn child are presumed killed.
Five years pass and a hardened Joshua is approached with information that Maya is alive and working alongside the AI in New Asia. He agrees to lead an assault on a lab where the AI are creating a super weapon. Backed by the truly ominous USS Nomad, an orbital station looming overhead, the Americans seek to destroy the weapon, level the lab, and end the war. Joshua’s goal is the find Maya and get her to safety before the assault commences. But things change when Joshua discovers the weapon is actually a 6-year-old AI girl who he dubs Alphie (Madeleine Yuna Voyles).
Believing the child can help him find Maya, Joshua disobeys orders and escapes with Alphie. This sets in motion the bulk of the film which follows their growing relationship while on the run. Joshua’s eyes inevitably begin to open while the American military’s violent fervor to destroy Alphie only intensifies. Edwards uses their journey to introduce a number of thoughts related to conspiracy theories, fearmongering, militarization, and justifying violence in the name of peace. Then of course you have the whole AI issue.
It goes without saying that Edwards has a lot on his mind. The themes he’s dealing with are rich although his positions can be overly simplistic and even sketchy in places. He often ignores more probing concerns and goes for surface level treatments instead. And his metaphors can be so glaringly on the nose that they sometimes lose their power.
Elsewhere his story leans too heavily on some well-worn tropes without doing much new with them. Clichés pop up in the plotting and in some of the characters, especially the one-note American military. This issue is epitomized in an overly brawny Allison Janney who plays a prototypical cold-blooded Colonel without a hint of nuance. She barks out orders with a callousness that borders on comical. There’s never a doubt of whose side Edwards is on.
Yet despite the occasional sloppy messaging, “The Creator” remains a striking original work. The world Gareth Edwards has created is captivating and imaginative, full of evocative imagery and jaw-dropping spectacle. But equally important is the film’s human pulse. It never loses its heart. And when combined with its stunning visual palette, it makes it a lot easier to look past the movie’s rather noticeable issues. “The Creator” is in theaters now.























