REVIEW: “Labor Day”

LABOR POSTEREven though the plot of “Labor Day” sounds like something plucked right out of Lifetime’s primetime television lineup, I was still optimistic considering the talent involved in the project. I greatly respect Jason Reitman as a screenwriter and a director. It also features Kate Winslet and Josh Brolin – two very capable performers who have done some great work during their careers. But I approached the film with a level of skepticism. Could Reitman deliver an intelligent romantic drama or would it be formulaic mush befitting a Harlequin novel?

First the story. The film takes place in the fictional town of Holton Mills, New Hampshire during a hot Labor Day weekend in 1987. 13-year old Henry (Gattlin Griffith) is a sweet and responsible boy who takes care of his severely depressed single mother Adele (Winslet). A number of terrible misfortunes have left her an emotional wreck so much so that their once-a-month trips to the supermarket triggers her anxiety. During one of those trips they encounter an escaped and injured felon named Frank (Brolin) who “convinces” them to drive him to their home. Once there he hopes to lay low until his wounds heal and he can skip town.

LABOR1

As every trailer and television commercial has already shared, Frank isn’t a terrible guy. We get some threatening vibes from him, but as escaped convicts doing time for murder usually go, he is pretty docile. He quickly connects with Adele and Henry, filling all sorts of fatherly and husband-like voids in their lives. He begins fixing things around the house, he teaches Henry how to throw a baseball, and a romance is sparked with Adele. The three create a beautiful fantasy-like world within the homeplace, but right outside is the reality of Frank’s past and his status as a wanted man.

In lesser hands this could have ended up a mushy, clichéd mess. Fortunately Reitman handles the material in a way that keeps that from happening. But not completely. There are a few incredibly sappy bits that hit us head-on. For example there is one scene where Frank reveals his culinary aptitude. In it we get a sequence ripped straight from the signature scene in “Ghost” except here the clay is replaced by peaches. We also get some schmaltzy lines of dialogue such as Frank saying in just the right romantic tone “I’ve come to save you Adele”.

There are also a couple of narrative choices that didn’t really work for me. There is an odd little diversion that gets into Henry’s pubescent struggles. Through it we meet an eccentric young girl who serves as his introduction to puberty. Both she and the entire story angle is underdeveloped and tacked on. We also get the old tried-and-true method of telling Frank’s backstory through a series of random flashbacks. They get the job done but it is a pretty conventional approach.

LABOR2

But despite all of these jabs I’ve thrown its way, “Labor Day” still manages to work. Other than the few hiccups, Reitman creates a small-scale intimacy that I connected with. Most importantly he gives us three main characters that we genuinely care about. This is important because when the film stumbles I still wanted to stay with these characters. I also love how Reitman uses the camera. He frames some beautiful shots and I love his visual perspective. And of course there are the two lead performances. Winslet has always been great at playing women in some form of anguish. Here she does it again with striking authenticity. Brolin’s rugged looks and charming sincerity are perfect for the role and helps their chemistry.

So clearly “Labor Day” has some issues but it also has some undeniable strengths. It can be a little too sappy and the melodrama can be extremely heavy. But it also has a sweet story with a lot of heart at its core. It all comes down to your ability to just go with it and get lost in the story. If you’re able to do that there is enough here to like. If you can’t then more than likely the film’s flaws will be all too glaring.

VERDICT – 3 STARS

Advertisements

31 thoughts on “REVIEW: “Labor Day”

    • Thanks man. As I mentioned, it’s a movie that you have to just go with. If you can do that it’s fairly enjoyable. I could day that to a point. On the other hand I can perfectly understand those who don’t like it. It had plenty of issues.

  1. Good review Keith. I’m glad Reitman decided to get outside of his comfort-zone a bit, but there is a better way to go about it. However, I still have to give him credit for trying, nonetheless.

    • Thanks. It’s definitely a different direction for Reitman. I’m with you, I’m not sure if this was the best result. Still I did find it to be a slightly above average film that entertained me.

  2. Glad to see this actually scoring a more positive review. I am very willing to go watch it at some point regardless. Tacked on things never work, when are writers going to realize this?

  3. I saw this recently. Stay tuned. I’ll be writing a review for this by the weekend and uh it’s not going to be pretty. Ha ha. Nice review. Glad you enjoyed it at least.

    • Probably. Ha Ha. I try not to read many reviews until after I write mine (if it’s a film I know I’m going to see soon). That said, I was aware that most reviews of the film were negative. But there are some positives. For example Richard Roeper gave it an “A”. I certainly don’t agree with that it’s that good of a movie, but he shared a thought I had – If you can just put somethings aside and go with the story, there’s entertainment to be had here.

    • I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s implausible. It has enough corn to make a casserole and it does require you to simply accept certain things. It certainly won’t win any awards for best script but it has enough going that I got some enjoyment out of it.

  4. Nice review Keith. To be honest, even w/ Kate Winslet in it, I’m not all that interested in seeing this. Maybe on a slow night I might rent it. Glad it’s not as horrible as I thought it’d be though. Somehow I’m getting a Nicholas Sparks’ vibe from the trailer, and that’s NOT a good thing in my book, ahah.

    • It doesn’t quite sink to Sparks levels (thank goodness). I pretty much rebel against anything Sparks brings to film. That said, this isn’t something you need to rush to the theater to see. A rainy night watch at home would perfectly suffice! 🙂

      • Ahah, so we agree that we’re not fond of Sparks then. I’m not even all that crazy about The Notebook, everyone’s fave rom-com as it were. I only like it because of the older couples storyline.

        Btw, I’m not too fond of Josh Brolin either in general, though he’s perhaps the best performer in Gangster Squad.

      • Ahh. I kinda like Brolin but he seems tailored to pretty specific types of roles. I thought he was pretty good here. But if you aren’t a fan, I can see this not winning you over.

    • Thanks man. Just keep your expectations in check. It should have been a better film. Still Winslet is always good even if the material is “meh”. She and Brolin manage to make me care about these characters.

    • Thanks man. This is really a departure for him. I understand that he was wanting to try some new things. We do get a glimpse of some of the things that have made him a good filmmaker. But as a whole it doesn’t live up to his past work. I still found some enjoyment here but it could have been a better movie.

  5. Nice review. Sounds like some great character sketches, besides the flaws you’ve mentioned. Am yet to find this, and am really keen on watching this. Great fan of KW, I’ve watched almost all her movies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s