REVIEW: “Son of Saul”

SAUL POSTEROne of the most highly praised films of 2015 came from 39 year-old Hungarian filmmaker László Nemes. He wrote and directed “Son of Saul”, a Holocaust drama set within the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. This certainly isn’t a new topic, but critics praised Nemes for his unique, honest, and unsentimental approach to it. The film has also won a slew of awards including several big prizes at Cannes, a Golden Globe, and it is the front runner for the Best Foreign Language Oscar. The great thing is “Son of Saul” is worthy of its praise.

Doing a film about the Holocaust requires a certain level of responsibility because reactions will undoubtedly vary depending on how you approach the subject matter. I remember criticisms surrounding 1997’s “Life is Beautiful”. Some took offense perceiving the film as too jokey and whimsical. While I completely disagree with that sentiment, it goes to show the range of reactions audiences often have even towards to most earnest of efforts.

Nemes doesn’t dodge these potential obstacles and he doesn’t take shortcuts. He firmly tackles the Holocaust with confidence both in the pull of his story and in the truth in his depiction. Nemes was inspired by a book titled “The Scrolls of Auschwitz”. It was a collection of true stories about Sonderkommandos – Jewish prisoners in concentration camps who were forced to dispose of those murdered in gas chambers and then executed themselves after a few months of work. Nemes and co-writer Clara Royer worked for five years on the script collaborating with historians and struggling to find financiers.


Hungarian poet Géza Röhrig (who had not acted since television 25 years ago) plays the lead character Saul Ausländer. It’s 1944 where Saul works as a Sonderkommando in Auschwitz. While clearing out gassed bodies of fellow Jews he discovers his son among the murdered. Nazi doctors designate the boy’s body for autopsy, but Saul wants a proper Jewish burial for his son. Obvious obstacles make that difficult. There is the brutal authority of his Nazi captors which is constantly in the background. He’s also caught in the middle of a brewing uprising which makes finding help among fellow prisoners difficult.

Röhrig’s performance is quiet but powerful. We know little about his character. No time is give to his history or backstory. But we do see Saul as a shell of a man. He is someone who has seen the very worst and it has left him emotionally cauterized. It is the sight of his son that stirs up something of his former self. It is that devastating discovery that reveals a small spark of life.

Nemes takes us along with Saul in a near moment-to-moment telling of his story. There is rarely a time lapse. His visual technique is clever, but it isn’t the easiest to get comfortable with. We spend the vast majority of the film looking at things through an over-the-shoulder third person perspective. We are literally right behind Saul. The camera will occasionally rotate around to focus in Röhrig’s intensely expressive face. We also get a few shots that zoom in to spotlight something that has grabbed Saul’s attention. But for the most part we are right on his back peering over his shoulder. It can offer some truly harrowing perspectives, but it can also be terribly disorienting especially when scenes intensify. This is clearly by design, but there were instances where I wanted the camera to just be still.


Thankfully the strengths of the visual presentation heavily outweigh the weaknesses. For example our vision is often hindered by our position. And since our line of sight is often strictly joined to Saul’s, we are often spared clear looks at the gruesome horrors taking place around us.

Nemes and cinematographer Matyas Erdely sometimes blur the outside boundaries of the shot which represent our unfocused view from the corners of our eyes. There is also a heavy dependence on sound. Tamás Zányi’s sound design is impeccable and plays a crucial part in deciphering what is going on around us. These techniques require our senses to play a major role in interpretation. We take the glimpses and sounds and paint our own mental depictions which can be challenging but also uniquely rewarding.

The approach the film uses frees it from many labels often cast upon Holocaust movies. It doesn’t sadistically wallow in misery. It doesn’t bludgeon the audience to death with the grisly horrors of the atrocities. At the same time it doesn’t soften its emotional punch in the slightest. “Son of Saul” is a difficult, harrowing, and exhausting film to endure – claustrophobic and psychological. But it’s also an intimate and gripping experience and an extraordinary feature film debut from László Nemes. What he has created is breathtaking and you won’t shake off its effects anytime soon.



22 thoughts on “REVIEW: “Son of Saul”

    • Thank you! So glad it finally made it to my area. It is really intense and you can count on it sticking with you. Hope you get a chance to see it soon.

    • Oh fantastic! Anxious to read your thoughts. It’s a tough movie to watch due to the subject matter and the visual style. But once you get your bearings it becomes unlike anything you’ve seen before.

      Seeing it this week?

      • Yup hopefully! I actually didn’r read your review for fear of spoilers haha, but I’ll read it and tell ya my thoughts once I’ve watched it.

      • I understand. I try to keep them spoiler-free but sometimes movies are better when you go in completely in the dark.

    • Absolutely. You really need to see it. Does it take a while for films like this to make it to your area? It does here which is very frustrating.

      • It really depends. Sometimes we’ll get smaller films quite early, but other times, it takes an extra month or two to make its way over. I agree; it’s very frustrating.

  1. Great review! It didn’t work as well for me. I agree it’s a very powerful film, but it was so bleak and I found myself getting frustrated with Saul’s line of thinking, even though I have no idea how I’d react in that scenario.

    • Definitely bleak. I think you touch on something interesting. I think his line of thinking was shaped by the horror he had seen. That’s what I say his emotions have been cauterized. And I think the thought of properly burying his son brings an actual spark of light and purpose that he hasn’t felt in a long time. That was really effective for me.

    • Thank you. Really glad to hear from those who have seen it. What did you think of the visual approach? It was tough for me to get my bearing at first but once I did I was really impressed.

    • It is sooo good. It’s such a shame that distribution can be such a pain. It makes it difficult for some people to see films like this. This one really is one that needs to be seen. Tough to watch but powerful stuff.

    • Love it Jordan. Tough watch but it should be. Its perspective is very unique and takes some getting used to. But it is a harrowing experience that will stick with you. I’m just glad it finally showed up in my area.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s