REVIEW: “Hunter Killer” (2018)

HUNTERbig

Am I the only one waiting for Gerard Butler to have that Matthew McConaughey-like renaissance? You know, where he lands that one movie that taps back into the talent that we once saw glimpses of before the cavalcade of hard-to-digest slop started churning out? Well, I hate to say it but “Hunter Killer” ain’t it.

Gerry Butler’s movies have almost become an absurd event for me. I would be lying if I didn’t admit to getting some type of weird entertainment value out of them. They’re routinely bad and always offer some level of goofiness to laugh at (most of the time unintentionally). “Hunter Killer” take a different approach. It nearly drowns in its own self-seriousness. That being said, here’s something funny – “Hunter Killer” isn’t as bad as it has every right to be.

HUNTER1

Now let’s not get carried away. This isn’t the movie that puts Butler back on track. Simply put, it’s impossible to take any part of this three-pronged story seriously. And the further you go the more you realize that it’s doing nothing that you haven’t seen many, many times before.

After a United States submarine suspiciously disappears in arctic waters, first-time Commander Joe Glass (Butler) is ordered to investigate. He takes the USS Arkansas and his new crew to do some deep seas super-sleuthing. Not only does he discover the fate of the U.S. sub but he stumbles upon a sunken Russian sub that has been sabotaged from the inside. Among its lone survivors is a dignified Russian Admiral played by Michael Nyqvist.

HUNTER2

Meanwhile a four-man Navy SEAL team covertly airdrops into Russia where they are to secretly observe the goings-on at a suspicious Russian naval base. Their reconnaissance uncovers a coup led by a wild-eyed defense minister (Mikhail Gorevoy), so cartoony he could have been pulled from a late 80s comic book.

The third thread of this story takes place at the Pentagon where government officials scramble to make sense of all the intel pouring in from the Arkansas and the SEAL team. Gary Oldman grabs a quick paycheck as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs while a stone-faced Common plays an Admiral with the emotional depth of a block of wood. Linda Cardellini gets a thankless role as a security advisor. Their roles consist of expressing various levels of concern as highly dramatic music looms in the background.

HUNTER3

Nothing in this three-story structure works particularly well on its own. You’ll have a hard time finding an original idea or interesting character in any of the scenarios. But when they all come together it does offer up some mindless entertainment. The pacing is good (which is probably a smart thing) and there are a handful of good action sequences that injects a little welcomed energy. We also get another good performance from the late Michael Nyqvist. It’s one of his final roles.

But despite my ability to squeeze a little enjoyment out of “Hunter Killer”, it’s still a movie that sinks more than swims. Pretty much every thing it does is by the numbers and while some of the casting may catch your eye, they’re more or less doing the same – checking boxes and offering up the best super-serious mugging they can muster.

VERDICT – 2 STARS

2-stars

15 thoughts on “REVIEW: “Hunter Killer” (2018)

  1. Good for you Keith, I have to say it — I am totally done with Gerard Butler. Watched Geostorm a few weeks back and man oh man that was PAINful. The guy has no appeal to me whatsoever anymore.

  2. I agree with you here. This ain’t a very good picture. I don’t understand why you had to put that red picture of mel Gibson and David Bowie up there in this review.

  3. I don’t think SHUT UP BUTTWAD!!!!! deserves a renaissance. He’s not talented enough nor does he have the humility to take roles that aren’t larger than life. Especially if you compare him to McConaughey who at least was willing to take risks. Besides, could you see BUTTWAD! do a role like…. Killer Joe?

  4. Good review. Personally, I loved this movie. Granted that both the characters and story are very broad, but it was definitely a fun military action feature that felt like throwback 90s action flick.

    • I liked it better than Butler’s other films of late and I can definitely see the 90’s comparison. Unfortunately the only part that has really stuck with me are are the war room scenes which I thought were pretty bad.

      • Oh, yeah….I agree that the movie was definitely one of Bulter’s better films to be a part of (in comparison to his other endeavors).

Leave a Reply to Tom Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s