REVIEW: “No Time to Die” (2021)

What a ride it has been for Daniel Craig. He first slid into the tuxedo of the dapper 007 back in 2006. Fifteen years and five movies later Craig wraps up his terrific run with the 25th installment in the James Bond franchise, “No Time to Die”. Due to several reasons (a global pandemic chief among them), we haven’t had a Bond film since 2015. That’s a long time, but I’m happy to say it was well worth the wait.

I was pretty lukewarm on James Bond movies until Craig came along. His first entry “Casino Royale” blew me away. I like his second film, the flawed “Quantum of Solace” more than most. I loved his third movie “Skyfall” but was more mixed on his fourth, “Spectre”. With “No Time to Die”, Craig is given the chance to end his tenure on a sky-high note. And boy does he.

Directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga, “No Time to Die” comes packaged with everything you want from a Bond movie – big action, even bigger characters, plenty of style, and a special dash of heart. But Craig’s movies have added grit to that list. His Bond carries the weight of loss, and his pain often pushes him outside the bounds of agency protocol. That emotional burden and his willingness to cross the line are traits that set his 007 apart from all the rest.

Image Courtesy of United Artists Releasing

This near $300 million sequel comes with a collection of old familiar faces as well as a few new ones. And once again this latest world-saving mission takes Bond (and us) to locations across the globe – Italy, Jamaica, Cuba, Norway, and of course London. And then you have the story itself which is not only thrilling blockbuster material, but it nails the tricky task of completing Daniel Craig‘s story arc. And it does it in an profoundly satisfying way.

The film begins with James having retired from MI6 and enjoying what resembles a normal life with Madeleine (a returning Léa Seydoux). But while on a romantic getaway in the exquisitely shot Matera, Italy, the couple are reminded why they’re always looking over their shoulders. Assassins sent by the nefarious crime syndicate Spectre ambush James leading to an exhilarating action sequence through the heart of the scenic city. Bond and Madeleine manage to escape, but he suspects her of betraying and the two split up.

Five years and one Billie Eilish Bond theme later, James is living in seclusion on a beach in Jamaica when he’s contacted by old friend and CIA field officer Felix Leiter (Jeffrey Wright). Felix needs Bond’s help tracking down a kidnapped scientist (David Dencik) who has developed a DNA-targeting bioweapon known as “Project Heracles”. Obviously, in the wrong hands the bioweapon could be catastrophic. And those hands happen to belong to Lyutsifer Safin (Rami Malek), a soft-spoken yet vengeful terrorist leader who has an axe to grind with Spectre and has a rather gnarly connection to Madeleine’s past. And just like that, Bond is back in the game.

From there the road gets curvier. Bond butts heads with MI6, particularly M (Ralph Fiennes) and a brash young 00 agent named Nomi (Lashana Lynch). The devilish Ernst Blofeld (Christoph Waltz) is still running Spectre from prison. And of course Madeleine resurfaces, now working as a psychotherapist for MI6, a job that puts her right in the crosshairs of the string-pulling madman Safin. And there are even more characters with parts to play including CIA agent Paloma (a wide-eyed and delightful Ana de Armas) who assists Bond in Cuba. And of course Q (Ben Whishaw) and Moneypenny (Naomie Harris) make welcomed returns.

But this is very much Bond’s movie. Not just in the traditional sense, but personally and emotionally. From its action-packed earliest frames, “No Time to Die” has a different pull than Craig’s other films in the franchise. Part of it may be psychological. We know this is Craig’s last ride and that realization inevitably adds some extra feeling for fans. But it’s also a conscious move from Fukunaga who manages to keep his film tonally in-tune with the others while putting a warm and empathetic spotlight on the weary and pained super spy. It’s a slippery balancing act, but Fukunaga nails it.

Image Courtesy of United Artists Releasing

Also, the movie looks amazing. Whether he’s capturing a location or shooting an elaborate action sequence, Oscar-winning DP Linus Sandgren always gives us something worth looking at. I mentioned the stunning opening in Italy. There’s also an impeccably shot edge-of-your-seat car chase/shootout in Norway. And of course, the big finish which features one particularly jaw-dropping close-quartered gunfight up a flight of stairs. Sandgren is constantly treating us to one breathtaking shot after another and frequently reminding us of why movies are always better on the big screen.

But what may be most impressive is how the movie flies by despite a hefty running time of 2 hours 43 minutes. I only checked my watch once and that was out of curiosity rather than boredom. Much of it has to do with Fukunaga’s crisp pacing and steady mix of drama and action. He never lets things get bogged down. At the same time, he never loses sight of his characters. Again, it’s a balance the film maintains that keeps it lively and engaging.

So how does “No Time to Die” match up with Craig’s other Bond movies. Well, I’m not ready to put it next to the superb “Casino Royale”, but it’s only a step or two below it. Not only has Cary Joji Fukunaga made a good Bond movie, but this is the kind entertainment I look for out of blockbusters. But perhaps most important for 007 fans, Fukunaga gives Craig a swan song that does him and his fifteen years spent On Her Majesty’s Secret Service justice. It’s a top-to-bottom fabulous finish for (dare I even say it) my favorite Bond of the franchise. “No Time to Die” opens today in theaters.

VERDICT – 4.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Lamb” (2021)

No other 2021 movie trailer threw me for a loop quite like the one for “Lamb”. Independent film distributor extraordinaire A24 did their job in delivering a fascinating albeit trippy tease for this Nordic folk-horror tale. The movie premieres this weekend and the trailer certainly had the trippy part right. But it’s a little misleading when it comes to the horror element. “Lamb” is a far cry from conventional and the horror it’s going for is far more subdued.

“Lamb” is directed by Valdimar Jóhannsson working from a script he wrote with poet, novelist and playwright Sjón. The film premiered at this year’s Cannes Film Festival and the first reactions intrigued me far more than the trailer. “Lamb” is unquestionably one of the weirdest movies of 2021. It’s also captivating from start to finish, beguiling and unsettling, and at times darkly funny in a way that fully embraces the absurdity that’s built into the story.

“Lamb” kicks off with a scene that introduces us to one of the film’s biggest assets – DP Eli Arenson. In the opening, his camera slowly eases across a stark snowy tundra where something moving in the icy mist has spooked the local animals. Arenson shoots the sequence from the lumbering something’s point-of-view and the only hint of what it may be is found in its deep heavy breathing and the crunch of the snow under its feet. The camera ends at a barn full of rattled sheep. Cut! Jóhannsson smartly ends the scene, giving us just enough to wet our appetites.

Image Courtesy of A24

That gives you a good sense of Jóhannsson’s approach to storytelling – patient, methodical, and as reliant on the gaze of Arenson’s camera as the three lone (yet sublime) performances. The dialogue is sparse at times (particularly in the first of the three chapters) and the use of music is strategic. And then there’s Ingvar Lunderg and Björn Viktorsson’s crafty sound design which plays a big part in developing mood and instilling a lingering sense of unease.

The above mentioned barn belongs to Maria (Noomi Rapace) and her husband Ingvar (Hilmir Snær Guðnason), owners of a sheep farm nestled in a scenic mountain valley in Iceland. The farm is as distant and remote as Maria and Ingvar’s relationship. There are no signs of enmity or bitterness between them. They’re just two emotionally withdrawn souls marching to the somber beat of their own drums. Their few conversations consist mostly of farm talk. Attempts at anything else comes across as awkward and frivolous.

But things turn towards the peculiar when a young ewe lamb is born; one alarmingly different than all the others. How is it different? Jóhannsson doesn’t show us, at least not at first. Instead he focuses solely on the farm couple’s astonished expressions. It’s yet another smart directing choice that connects us emotionally with Maria and Ingvar while effectively building our curiosity and anticipation.

Maria’s maternal instincts immediately kick in and she takes the lamb as her own, much to the consternation of the bleating birth mother. Maria names the lamb Ada, wraps her in warm blankets, and let’s her sleep in a washtub bassinet until Ingvar can dust off an old crib from the barn. Something is clearly off with this scenario and the audience members aren’t the only ones who recognize it. The observations of the couple’s sheep dog and house cat as well as the eerie cutting stares of the disapproving sheep convey a similar apprehension.

Image Courtesy of A24 Studios

Things get even more complicated when Ingvar’s deadbeat brother Pétur (Björn Hlynur Haraldsson) shows up unannounced needing a place to crash. He is immediately taken aback by Ada and his wordless deadpan first reaction is an instance of both perfect timing and perfect framing resulting in a true laugh-out-loud moment. It’s that kind of subtle dark humor that Jóhannsson sprinkles throughout his middle chapter. Yet he always maintains a straight-faced sincerity that keeps his movie from becoming farce.

I won’t spoil anything, but it’s pretty easy to figure out what’s going on. What you won’t predict is what happens in the final ten minutes. Myself, I’m still trying to figure out how well the ending works. On one hand, it feels underdeveloped, abrupt, and a bit too ambiguous for its own good. On the other hand, it’s startling, bizarre, and in a sense a perfectly fitting wrap for a movie like this. The emotional payoff is almost certain to hit people differently and the final shot is as puzzling as it is affecting. Does it make for a satisfying finish? I’m still wrestling with that.

If you’ve read everything up to this point, you’ve probably figured this out – “Lamb” won’t be for everyone. Its strangeness alone will confound some while it’s simmering slow born may push away others who bought into the trailer’s more conventional sales pitch. Personally, I gravitate towards this deliberate observational style. Jóhannsson’s keen direction, the striking visuals, and the palpable emotion from the performances carry a lot of weight and ground the story (as absurd as it is). At the same time, themes of parenthood, loss, and human/animal coexistence bubble under the surface, often snapping us out of the film’s intoxicating hypnotic spell. “Lamb” opens in select theaters tomorrow (October 8th).

VERDICT – 4 STARS

First Glance: “Cyrano”

The movie musical resurgence continues with “Cyrano”, an upcoming adaptation of Erica Schmidt’s 2018 stage musical which was an adaptation of Edmond Rostand’s classic 1897 play, “Cyrano de Bergerac”. The film comes for director Joe Wright who last film “The Woman in the Window” didn’t quite live up to its potential. But Wright has a pretty good track record so there’s reasons to be optimistic.

Rather than being the story of a man with giant nose, the Cyrano in Wright’s film is of tiny stature (played by the always superb Peter Dinklage). Cyrano is in love with a young beauty named Roxanne (Haley Bennett) but he’s convinced himself he’s unworthy of her affection. He’s finally able to express through romantic love letters written in the name of a dashing young suitor (Kelvin Harrison, Jr.). There are definitely some of Wright’s signature visual flourishes and the cast is intriguing. That’s enough for me to give it a go.

“Cyrano” opens in theaters December 31st. Check out the trailer below and let me know if you’ll be seeing it or taking a pass.

REVIEW: “The Last Mercenary” (2021)

The action movies of the 80’s and early 90’s had a goofy and over-the-top style all their own. During my teen years and early twenties I couldn’t get enough of them. At the top of the food chain were the marquee names Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone. Just a step below were a handful of others including the martial artist known as The Muscles from Brussels (yes kids, that’s what some called him) Jean-Claude Van Damme.

For several years Van Damme was a big box office draw, but he fell out of the mainstream once the cinema landscape began its shift away from the machismo-infused romps that made him and others famous. Still, Van Damme has continued to make movies, releasing mostly straight-to-DVD action flicks every year since 2001. His latest film is “The Last Mercenary”, a French action-comedy from Netflix Studios.

Image Courtesy of Netflix

“The Last Mercenary” is a weird experience. At times it’s a painfully bland and erratically edited genre blend that bounces here to there with no real sense of flow. But then you see a self-deprecating JVD, his hair a little thinner and his wrinkles a little deeper. You see him joyously riffing on his past action star persona (even his infamous bad dancing). You watch him poke fun of his own enigmatic up-and-down movie career. Suddenly you can’t help but smile.

The film is directed by David Charhon and co-written by Charhon and Ismael Sy Savane. Their story puts the 60-year-old JVD in the role of the near mythical mercenary Richard Brumère aka “The Mist”. He comes out of seclusion after learning that the French government has accused his dim dope-peddling son Archibald (Samir Decazza) of being a wanted arms dealer named Simyon.

The movie features an off-beat blend of action and comedy that’s built around a fairly predictable father/son reconciliation. Richard left his son and late wife to protect them from the violence that comes with his job. Archibald feels his father abandoned him, and his mother’s death only deepened those wounds. There are occasional moments of heart where this fractured relationship gets some attention. But it always feels secondary to getting a laugh.

Image Courtesy of Netflix

In order to protect Archibald from the real Simyon (wildly overplayed by Nassim Lyes) and to root out the corrupt government officials working to keep Simyon’s identity concealed, Richard forms a team of local outcasts to help him. Dalila (Assa Sylla) and her brother Momo (Djimo) make for good comic sidekicks while Alexandre (Alban Ivanov), who was booted from the French Ministry for getting too close to the truth, is the movie’s clown – occasionally funny but way too over-the-top.

It’s fun watching JVD ham it up, whether he’s winking at a poster of his breakout movie “Bloodsport” or donning goofy disguises reminiscent of Peter Sellers’ bumbling Inspector Clouseau. But even that eventually wears thin leaving us with a haphazard movie that has more in common with a hyperactive cartoon. The humor ranges from silly to cringe-worthy with the worse being this running gag about Richard’s ‘ladies man’ status. Meanwhile the skittish editing only emphasizes the story’s overall clunkiness. And JVD’s best (and silliest) efforts can’t quite make up for it.

VERDICT – 2 STARS

REVIEW: “Bingo Hell” (2021)

I’ve never claimed to be the sharpest knife in the drawer, and there’s plenty of evidence to prove that I’m not. Case in point, the hilariously titled new horror film “Bingo Hell”. Embarrassingly, it wasn’t until the neon lit title screen that I made the bingo HALL connection. It turns out that wasn’t the only chuckle I would get out of this just released Amazon Studios Original.

Directed by Gigi Saul Guerrero, “Bingo Hell” is the fifth installment of Amazon’s “Welcome to the Blumhouse” horror anthology. As the name intimates, the series of feature films are developed and produced by Jason Blum’s Blumhouse productions and highlight stories told from filmmakers with fresh visions and perspectives. As with any ambitious endeavor like this, you have your hits and misses. But I appreciate what it’s doing, hiccups and all.

“Bingo Hall” is an interesting entry. It’s a brisk and straightforward movie with enough genre flourish to keep horror fans interested. It’s also laced with a fair amount lightly breaded social commentary on class, community, the allure of money, gentrification, etc. Not all of it makes sense nor does it come across as anything especially new or revelatory. But it does offer a unique perspective and its cast of likable characters help overlook some of the storytelling issues.

Image Courtesy of Amazon Studios

The story is set in the sleepy little fictional town of Oak Springs. It’s a place where development companies are buying up property and homes while many of the decades-old hometown businesses are closing up shop. The changing landscape doesn’t sit well with some of the town’s old-timers, especially Lupita (Adriana Barraza), a surly and outspoken local who simmers at the influx of coffee shops, vape lounges and the young hipsters who frequent them. Oak Springs is her life, and she’s not about to let it dry up without a fight.

To let off steam Lupita, her best friend Dolores (L. Scott Caldwell), and a fun assortment of other elderly townsfolk enjoy bingo at the town community center. But you know it’s trouble when a fancy black sedan rolls into town with pitch-black tinted windows and a license plate that reads “BIG WINN3R”. The car belongs to a sinister looking cat who goes by the name of Mr. Big (a fittingly creepy Richard Brake). Lupita and her friends learn that Mr. Big has purchased the community center and seemingly over night turns it into a bingo hall with enough flashing neon inside and out to rival anything on the Las Vegas strip.

His glaringly evil look and the movie’s title let us know that Mr. Big is up to no good. Soon his fancy parlor and high stakes bingo games are luring in citizens from all around the city. And as you can guess, the big winners of his games don’t get to enjoy their winnings for very long. In fact, winning gets you a briefcase full of money and a gory death at the hands of this poorly defined supernatural menace. Just who is Mr. Big? What’s he after? What’s with all the green goo that had me thinking about Slimer from “Ghostbusters”? I still don’t know. He throws out a couple of generic lines about feeding on souls, buts that’s about it. Clear as mud.

Image Courtesy of Amazon Studios

While Guerrero does a good job early on introducing us to her characters and setting up her story, the buildup to the predictably inevitable ending feels remarkably light. It consists of a lot of elderly bickering but little in terms of development or revelation. The performances liven up the characters and there are some really good interactions between them. It’s hard not to enjoy their individual charms and there is some fun humor that seeps out of their relationships.

Guerrero also shows a good eye behind the camera. She uses a captivating blend of angles, perspectives, and color palettes that really speaks to some of her influences. But “Bingo Hell” needs more than sharp visuals and fun characters. The story is all buildup but little payoff. It introduces a menacing villain, but he’s too thinly sketched to feel like a real threat and we’re left wondering about him rather than being spooked.

So “Bingo Hell” is flawed and doesn’t quite fulfill the potential it shows early on. Yet I’m glad I watched it. It’s hard to let some of the nagging issues slide, but it does have some alluring traits and clever filmmaking touches that show why Guerrero is considered by many to be a young talent to keep your eye on. “Bingo Hell” is now available to stream on Amazon Prime.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Good on Paper” (2021)

It’s amazing how well the title “Good on Paper” fits this new Netflix comedy from first time director Kimmy Gatewood. The film is written by and stars stand-up comic Iliza Shlesinger who has the big personality and snappy wit you often look for in good comedies. But “Good on Paper” is exactly that – an idea for a movie that probably sounded great during conception but that falls apart on screen. It’s a shame because it begins with a fair amount of promise.

Shlesinger plays Andrea Singer, a fairly successful stand-up comic trying to break into acting but getting nothing but rejection from her countless auditions. On a flight back to Los Angeles she meets Dennis (a hunky Ryan Hansen sporting nerdy glasses and a bad comb-over in an effort to make him look homely). He comes packaged with some pretty attractive qualities. He’s a Yale graduate, has a high-paying job as a hedge fund manager, and owns a big house in Beverly Hills. The two instantly hit it off and begin spending a lot of time together in LA.

Image Courtesy of NETFLIX

It doesn’t take long for us to notice that Dennis is clearly smitten, but to Andrea their relationship is purely platonic. Of course the more they’re together the closer they become and the awkward yet inevitable romance blossoms. But to the film’s credit this isn’t a prototypical romantic comedy. And as the two friends slowly morph into a couple, Andrea begins noticing cracks in Dennis’ story. Is he really who he says he is? Did he really go to Yale? Does his mother have cancer? Did he ever really have a supermodel girlfriend?

Then the movie starts to fall apart. Andrea’s state of oblivion is mind-boggling which does no favors to the character. We can certainly see enough to figure things out. Even the suspicions of her best friend Margot, a brash stock character of a sidekick played by Margaret Cho, falls on deaf ears. By the time it all finally comes to a head the story has completely unraveled into a weirdly out-of-tune mess that doesn’t seem sure of what it wants to be. And the final act is painful to sit through, taking several wacky turns, throwing out some jarringly unnatural dialogue, and giving us some cringe-soaked scenes that resemble really bad sketch routines.

By the end it’s really hard to buy into anything “Good on Paper” is selling. Outside of the first 30 minutes, nothing about the film feels remotely authentic from its flaky characters to the unconvincing relationships. And while it tries, the movie has nothing especially meaningful to say about single life or dating. I ended up unsure of what the movie was other than a showcase for Shlesinger who certainly has the comedic chops. She just may want someone else to write the material next time around. “Good on Paper” is now streaming on Netflix.

VERDICT – 1.5 STARS