REVIEW: “Midnight in Paris”

MIDNIGHT POSTER

Without a doubt the romantic comedy is one of the weaker movie genres and has been for years. But sometimes we get a special gem that reminds us of just how fun these types of movies can be. “Midnight in Paris”, written and directed by Woody Allen, is a crash course in the art of making a romantic comedy. It is loaded with heart and feeling and doesn’t trudge down the same path as so many failed films of this genre. It’s a movie that captures the magic of it’s location and the inner workings of it’s characters. It’s clever and unique while maintaining a true romantic feel and sense of humor.

“Midnight in Paris” opens with a picturesque three-minute montage focusing on the beauty of Paris, France. It gracefully moves from one exquisitely framed shot to another, showing us historical landmarks, museums, cafes, and more all set to the lovely “Si Tu Vois Ma Mere”. It elegantly sets up the city of Paris as not only a central character in the film, but an enchanting and magical force whose influence is seen throughout the picture. In many ways Woody Allen is celebrating Paris. He wants us to love the city and appreciate the mystique of it’s rich history just as much as his main character does. Allen’s desire works. I was instantly grabbed and found myself totally lost in what I was seeing on the screen.

Midnight1

While Paris is at the heart of the story, the main character is Gil Pender (Owen Wilson), a hack Hollywood screenwriter who is visiting the city with his fiancée and her parents. Gil loves everything about Paris and to this day regrets his decision not to move there when he had a chance several years ago. He feels he was meant for more than writing screenplays but he struggles with confidence. He doesn’t feel comfortable in today’s world and believes he would be a better fit in the 1920s. His fiancée Inez (Rachel McAdams) is a spoiled momma’s girl who spends more time insulting Gil than supporting him. There is clearly a disconnect between the two. He loves Paris and she doesn’t. He’s working on a novel that he thinks will change his career and she thinks he’s wasting his time. He enjoys the small details in life while she would rather milk it for it’s benefits.

While in Paris they run into Paul (Michael Sheen), Inez’s old friend and self-proclaimed expert on everything from art to French culture to fine wines. Inez seems infatuated with Paul’s knowledge regardless of how many facts he gets wrong in his efforts to impress everyone. Needing to get away, Gil takes off on a late night walk. After getting lost, he is picked up by a group of partiers in an old classic car who magically transport him back to 1920s Paris. Here he meets many of his literary and artistic heroes such as Fitzgerald, Hemingway, Picasso, and Stein. He also meets the lovely Adriana (played wonderfully by Marion Cotillard) who he grows more attracted to with each midnight visit.

The fantasy turn of Allen’s story did feel a bit out of the blue at first but it didn’t take long before I was enthralled with what I was seeing. Gil’s golden age is recreated flawlessly from the music and atmosphere to the careful attention to detail. I loved seeing these authors, painters, composers, and filmmakers of old fleshed out through some fantastic performances. Tom Hiddleston and Alison Pill are absolutely brilliant as F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald. I also loved Marcial Di Fonzo Bo as Picasso and Adrien Brody as Dali, both in smaller but fun roles. And then there’s Corey Stoll as Hemingway who steals many of the scenes he’s in. The supporting cast is such a wonderful ingredient to the film’s charm.

MIDnight2

But in terms of acting it’s Owen Wilson that really blew me away. In many ways he plays a character that really fits him. We’ve seen elements of this performance in other roles of his but here everything is perfectly measured and controlled. Even though Woody Allen has stated he gave Wilson a lot of room to work, it’s clear that Allen has a solid influence on his performance. I’ve been really lukewarm concerning most of Wilson’s past work but he really, really impressed me here. He dials it back a bit and never allows his performance to drown out the material.

“Midnight in Paris” does call for the audience to just buy into it’s fantasy angle and if you struggle with that you may struggle with this picture. It also turns out to be fairly predictable in places. But these small gripes do nothing to kill the magic of this picture for me. This is certainly a love letter to Paris, but it’s also a lesson on living in the present. Allen reminds us that the golden age so many long for isn’t that different from where we are now. It’s a beautiful film both visually and structurally and it moves along at an almost poetic pace. Better yet, “Midnight in Paris” is a film that gives us hope for a struggling genre. I love this movie.

VERDICT – 5 STARS

5 STARSs

5STAR K&M

The Keith & Movies Valhalla Induction: “There Will Be Blood”

MT OLYMPUS

The Keith & the Movies Valhalla is a place of tribute for those movies that I hold in the highest regard. These are films that embody everything that is great about motion pictures. These are the best of the best – movies that I truly love and that stand above the rest. There are many great movies that won’t find their way into these sacred halls. But here you will find those films that I believe personify brilliance in filmmaking, storytelling, and entertainment. These glorious 5 star accomplishments are worthy of special recognition as the very best. Ok, enough of the high drama! In other words, these are my favorite movies of all time, ok?

BLOODFor me, no movie is driven by a more brilliant and quite frankly perfect performance than Paul Thomas Anderson’s “There Will Be Blood”. From the moment Daniel Day-Lewis appears on screen Anderson’s grimy period vision begins to flourish before out eyes. Day-Lewis’ work here is mesmerizing and a prime example of why he is our greatest working actor today. Channeling his best John Huston voice, Day-Lewis stunningly portrays one of the most vile yet compelling movie characters ever. I can’t imagine any working actor being able to pull it off so well.

But while the lead performance is the true highlight for me, there is more to love about “There Will Be Blood” than just that. Anderson’s script is crisp and razor sharp and it gives Day-Lewis plenty to chew on. I also love all the things that bring this region specific period picture to life from the flawless cinematography to the unnerving score. Paul Thomas Anderson puts together an amazing motion picture experience that I can watch over and over. For me it’s clearly Anderson’s best film. But I’ll go even further. It’s one of my favorite films of all time so its place in the Valhalla is well deserved. What a gem!

“There Will Be Blood” is the sixth inductee into the Keith & the Movies Valhalla. But there are more amazing movies to come in the near future so stay tuned. What are your thoughts on this Paul Thomas Anderson new classic? Is it worth the accolades it’s received or is it an overrated picture? What about the performance of Daniel Day-Lewis? You now know my opinion. I’d love to hear yours. Please take time to share your comments below.

K & M Commentary – The Challenges of the Franchise Reboot

typewriter-banner 1

Even the most casual moviegoer can recognize that the reboot and remake bug has spread through almost all of Hollywood. Remakes must be the believed remedy for Hollywood’s current bouts with lack of originality and general lack of inspiration. We seem to get loads of them each year. In 2013 alone we get “Lone Ranger”, “Evil Dead”, “Carrie”, “Oldboy”, “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” and more. And there doesn’t seem to be a film that’s exempt from this current craze. I mean regardless of how obviously stupid the idea was, “Footloose” even managed to get a remake.

And then you have franchise reboots which are something different. Through recent years we’ve seen Hollywood attempt to reboot past franchises which hasn’t always been a good idea. Sensing another series of movies and a hefty profit, studios are eager to breath new life into older franchises sometimes at the expense of the property. But reboots bring up a great topic of discussion. How much leniency do you give filmmakers when they’re rebooting or remaking cherished material? How much should be forgiven or overlooked in the name of a fresh new vision?

I’ve heard some people say that only fanboys get worked up over this type of thing. Some are able to completely disassociate the new reboot from the original film or series it’s based on. Those invested find the source material sacred and feel that a serious divergence from it is criminal. I’m somewhere in the middle. I’m all for having a new vision but it has to be tempered with respect for the source material. This is an even bigger deal when you’re attempting to remake a property that has a deep and beloved history as well as a firm following.

Just last week we saw the release of “Star Trek Into Darkness“, the second film since the franchise was rebooted in 2009. The first movie was widely successful and most have really embraced it as a great reboot. Personally I can’t call it great because of its mangling of some key points in the source material and its redefining of some big characters. Yet others, many of them Star Trek fans, have given the movie a pass for this. Am I too attached to the original material? Are they too flippant with it? I think the answer lies in the overall quality of the movie. Even with its flaws, “Star Trek” is still a fun and highly entertaining film. It’s a lot easier to overlook blemishes or freedoms when the overall product is so strong.

But there are examples of reboots (or in this case an attempted reboot) that can’t overcome the altered vision of the filmmakers. 2006’s “Superman Returns” was the vehicle that would get another Surperman franchise up and running. While the film had a good box office showing, infighting and dissatisfaction with the film and the Superman character scratched the planned sequel. That was a good idea because “Superman Returns” was a reboot that didn’t work in large part due to the treatment of the characters. It’s an okay movie up until the end where the source material is flushed and a new more modern twist had me and many others checking out. This “vision” from the filmmakers helped kill this franchise before it got started.

These same liberties have also killed other franchises particularly in the superhero/comic book genre. “X-Men: The Last Stand” was an atrocious trampling of the X-Men’s near 50 year-long history. Killing Cyclops within the first 5 minutes of the film on top of several other lesser but equally uncalled for liberties ended up burying the franchise. “X-Men Origins: Wolverine” was hoped to be the first of several X-Men origin films but the absurd obliteration of these characters and their history proved to be a bad move. In the end it was a bad movie and the “X-Men Origins” idea was canned. Once again the sacrifice of the rich source material for new visions didn’t pay off.

There’s a fine line that a filmmaker must walk when it comes to rebooting new material. For some it just comes down to whether or not it’s a good movie. For others, the film’s appreciation and respect for the source material is part of what makes the movie good. Do I think filmmakers should be stripped of any creativity and vision when rebooting a popular property? Absolutely not. A simple rehash of what’s already been done offers nothing new or fresh. But when you have a beloved series, book, comic book character, etc. the history should always be respected. And if you the filmmakers choose to drastically alter that, don’t be surprised if there aren’t those who take issue with it.

Film Fans, Let’s Introduce Ourselves…

HANDSHAKE

During the 15 months that I’ve been doing this crazy blogging thing I’ve met an amazing assortment of people from all over the world. While I love writing about movies and sharing my thoughts with others, perhaps my favorite thing about blogging has been the fellow movieoholics I’ve met. But I got to thinking, even though I’ve learned a lot of things about a lot of people, there’s still some cool stuff that would be fun to know.

So consider this a chance for a more proper introduction and not just for me but for all of the other movie fans that choose to share. Here’s the way it works, I’m tossing out 5 easy questions. I’ll answer them to let you know a little about me and then you do the same in the comments section below. Simple stuff but it’ll also be great for us all to know a little more about each other and share our blog sites (for those who have the).

Here we go. Here are the 5 easy questions followed by my answers:

1. WHAT’S YOUR NAME & WHERE ARE YOU FROM?: Keith (Never would have guessed that, huh?) from South Central Arkansas, USA

2. WHAT’S YOUR BLOG’S NAME & LINK (if you blog): Keith & the Movies –
http://keithandthemovies.com (That’s more obvious than the first question, right?)

3. WHAT ARE 3 OF YOUR FAVORITE FILMS (Not necessarily your top three, just three of your favorites)? : “Casablanca”, “Night of the Living Dead”, “The Empire Strikes Back”

4. WHAT ARE 3 OF YOUR NON-MOVIE RELATED INTERESTS? : Major League Baseball (Go Rangers!), Anything about Paris, theology

5. WHAT IS ONE FUNNY OR INTERESTING MOVIE-RELATED FACT ABOUT YOU? : I’m a Humphrey Bogart nut. I have almost all of his movies (even the smaller forgotten ones) either on DVD or VHS. I have a life-sized Bogart cardboard cutout standing in our bedroom next to my side of our bed (what a great wife I have). Heck I even have a certified copy of Bogart’s death certificate. Idiotic? Yes I know.

Now you know a little about me. It’s your turn. I hope you’ll jump in and leave your answers in the comments section below. Let’s all get to know each other a little better!

THE END

Flaunt It or Flush It? – Summer Movies 2013

flaunt-flush

It’s hard to believe but it’s already time for the summer movie season. The year didn’t start off on a good note but things did pick up a little during the spring. I saw several good movies since the first of March. But now it’s money time both literally and figuratively. The summer time brings out the big budget cash cows that all of the studios have been waiting to unveil. With the summer movie season finally here that means it’s Flaunt It or Flush It time. This is where I list five movies that I’m particularly excited about. These I will flaunt. Then I’ll mention five summer movies that I want no part of. These I will flush. So let’s get to it.

FLAUNT ‘EM

Man of steel#1 – “MAN OF STEEL” (June 14, 2013) – It’s hard for me to believe that in the era of the superhero movie there’s no successful Superman franchise. Hopefully that will change June 14th. This new reboot of Superman has grown on me with every bit of new news and every new trailer. There’s a tremendous cast in place including names like Russell Crowe, Kevin Costner, Amy Adams, Michael Shannon, and Dianne Lane. But even more exciting is that Christopher Nolan is serving as producer and hopefully his creative influence will give this film something the last Superman effort lacked. I can’t help it, I’m really excited about this one folks.

GATSBY#2 – “THE GREAT GATSBY” (May 10, 2013) – “Gatsby? What Gatsby”? Why it’s Leonardo DiCaprio playing the mysterious and wealthy socialite from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic tale. This was one of my most anticipated movies from last year before it ended up being pushed back to 2013. Baz Luhrmann is directing the film and all you have to do is watch the trailers to get a sense of the vivid and exciting style he’s bringing to the story. DiCaprio seems perfect for the role and there are some very interesting supporting roles for Carey Mulligan and Joel Edgerton. I love Fitzgerald’s story and I am insanely pumped for this film.

Before Midnight#3 – “BEFORE MIDNIGHT” (May 24, 2013) – It was 1995 when we first met Jesse and Celine on a train from Budapest. The two strangers hop off in Vienna and begin one of cinema’s most mesmerizing romances. After a stop in Paris for “Before Sunset”, the couple is back this year in “Before Midnight”. The trailer tosses out all sorts of interesting new questions about this couple. Of course Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy are back, both working again with director Richard Linklater. This small independent movie series has gained a nice sized following and I’m certainly a fan. I can’t wait to catch back up with these interesting and enthralling characters.

IRON MAN#4 – “IRON MAN 3” (May 3, 2013) – I loved the first Iron Man movie and while some people had problems with it, I enjoyed the second film as well. “Iron Man 3” really has me excited mainly because of its intriguing cast. First of all anytime Robert Downey, Jr. suits up in the red and gold armor I’m onboard. But listen to who joins him: Gwyneth Paltrow and Don Cheadle return. But new to the franchise is Guy Pearce (one of my favorite actors in the business) and the wonderful and underrated Rebecca Hall. I do question the decision to give the reins to director Shane Black but Marvel has a pretty good track record so far.

WORLD WAR Z#5 – “WORLD WAR Z” (June 21, 2013) – “World War Z” was on my list of most anticipated films of 2013 so I may be flaunting it out of a sense of obligation. I have to be honest, my enthusiasm isn’t nearly as high as when I saw the first trailer. That being said I still think there is potential here for a crazy summer popcorn romp. Brad Pitt stars in a film that seems like one part zombie apocalyptic horror and another part explosive action. That’s right up my alley. Still I realize that this thing could go in a number of different directions. I choose optimism. My fingers are crossed and we’ll see what happens June 21st.

FLUSH ‘EM

THE HEAT#1 – “THE HEAT” (June 28, 2013) – I don’t think there are any trailers so far in 2013 that has annoyed me more than the ones for “The Heat”. I mean the regular theatrical trailer is enough to grind your last nerve but have you seen the red band trailer? It solidified this movie’s position at the very top of the ‘Flush It’ order. Sandra Bullock and the overrated Melissa McCarthy are embarrassingly bad in the trailer. And these are usually considered the best scenes? This thing looks like an absolute disaster and yet another stupid entry into the comedy genre. I’m sure some people will go see it. I promise you I won’t be one of them.

GROWN UPS#2 – “GROWN UPS 2” (July 12, 2013) – Words can’t express how much I disliked Adam Sandler’s “Grown Ups”. It was terrible on almost every level. But somehow this guy is a box office draw which unfortunately results in “Grown Ups 2”. The first film was a lazy, juvenile, and cheap comedy that had no redeeming qualities at all. Why on earth would I expect this thing to be any different? The same cast is back (minus Rob Schneider) so that’s not encouraging. But don’t worry, Sandler has added the Oscar caliber acting talent of Stone Cold Steve Austin and Taylor Lautner to save the day. Yep, this one’s going to stink.

Hangover 3#3 – “THE HANGOVER PART III” (May 24, 2013) – If you would have told me that “The Hangover” would turn into an enormously popular, money-making trilogy I would have accused you of sniffing glue. I’m not sure why but the first movie of this series attracted a huge audience. That resulted in an absolutely atrocious sequel. That unwatchable garbage made more money so here we go again. Now I mentioned how annoying the trailer for “The Heat” was. The trailer for “The Hangover III” isn’t annoying. It’s just terrible and I don’t expect the movie to be any different. I’m more than happy to pull the handle and flush this thing.

SMURFS#4 – “THE SMURFS 2” (July 31, 2013) – There’s no way anyone will convince me to waste my time or money on “Smurfs 2”. This sequel to the ridiculously successful 2011 live action/animated bore will most certainly provide more of the same. Now for the youngest possible movie watcher there will probably be some smiles. But for anyone over 3 years old, not so much. I will say that I don’t expect “Smurfs 2” to be as openly repellent as the other movies on this list, but I know it’s going to be the same flat, repetitive, and cutesy humor as before. There’s no smurfing way I’ll be checking this out.

INTERNSHIP#5 – “THE INTERNSHIP” (June 7, 2013) – What a surprise – another lame, unfunny looking comedy hitting theaters this summer. “The Internship” looks bad enough just from the trailers, but there’s more that should make you uneasy. Just knowing that this movie was made by many of the people who brought you “The Watch” last year should give you an idea of what we’ll be getting. Personally I still dont find Vince Vaughn funny and he wrote and stars in the film. I have no doubt that “The Internship” will grab a nice hunk of money at the box office. But I think I’ll wait for a comedy that actually looks funny. This just looks like a flusher.

There you go. I’ve flaunted five films that I’m anxious to see and flushed five that look like…well…crap. Agree or disagree? What are some summer movies you would like to flaunt or flush. Let me hear from ya.

The Keith & the Movies Valhalla Induction

K&M VALHALLA

The Keith & the Movies Valhalla is a place of tribute for those movies that I hold in the highest regard. These are films that embody everything that is great about motion pictures. These are the best of the best – movies that I truly love and that stand above the rest. There are many great movies that won’t find their way into these sacred halls. But here you will find those films that I believe personify brilliance in filmmaking, storytelling, and entertainment. These glorious 5 star accomplishments are worthy of special recognition as the very best. Ok, enough of the high drama! In other words, these are my favorite movies of all time, ok?

______________________________________________________________________________

ONCE UPON A TIMEONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST (1968) – I’ve always been picky when it comes to westerns. I grew up around them but I never latched onto them. That was before Sergio Leone showed me what a western could be. His monumental work “Once Upon a Time in the West” from 1968 is hands down my favorite western. Everything from Leone’s gritty signature style and brilliant camerawork to Ennio Morricone’s entrancing score works to perfection.

There are so many memorable scenes in “Once Upon a Time in the West”. From the masterfully conceived train station opening to the intense and anticipated final showdown, the film is filled with one fantastic scene after another. And of course how can I talk about this movie and not mention the cast. A young Charles Bronson plays the mysterious stranger who everybody is trying to figure out. Jason Robards gives the best performance of his career as a scruffy bandit ringleader. Then there’s the breathtakingly beautiful Claudia Cardinale who holds her own with all the tough guys. But it’s Henry Fonda who steals the movie as one of the most detestable villains you’ll find. It’s a role unlike anything Fonda had played at the time which made his performance all the more spectacular. If you haven’t seen this film you should. If you don’t like westerns, it doesn’t matter. A great movie is a great movie and this is a great movie.

“Once Upon a Time in the West”  is the fifth inductee into the Keith & the Movies Valhalla. But there are more amazing movies to come in the near future so stay tuned. What are your thoughts on this Sergio Leone classic? Is it worth the accolades it’s received or is it an overrated picture? You now know my opinion. I’d love to hear yours. Take time to share your comments below.