Rachel Lee Goldenberg directs and co-writes “Swiped”, a biographical drama that follows the professional career of Whitney Wolfe Herd. If you’re like me, that may not be a name you’re familiar with. Herd was the co-founder of the popular dating app Tinder and later the founder and CEO of the dating and social networking app Bumble. She broke down countless barriers, and as a result of her work she became the world’s youngest self-made female billionaire.

Goldenberg’s story, which she co-wrote with Bill Parker and Kim Caramele, begins with Whitney Wolfe (wonderfully played by Lily James) trying to raise capital for her new startup. The Whitney we are introduced to is smart, ambitious, and determined. It’s those traits that impress a young upstart CEO named Sean Rad (Ben Schnetzer) who hires her to be the Marketing Director for his own startup, Cardify.

But his fortune changes when Rad launches a new dating app called Tinder. Despite being one of the big brains behind the app, Whitney watches as Rad and his two frat-boyish partners, Justin (Jackson White) and Jonathan (Ian Colletti) take most of the credit. That is until Whitney takes the app on a college marketing blitz starting with her alma mater, SMU. As a result, Tinder’s downloads skyrocket and Whitney is promoted to co-founder.

But despite her new status within the company, Whitney can’t penetrate the poorly veiled boys club at the top. A big chunk of the movie examines that workplace dynamic which only intensifies after she starts dating fellow founder Justin. Misogyny, jealousy, and harassment follow as Goldenberg takes a scalpel to the male-dominated tech industry culture. Unfortunately her blade never quite breaks the skin of what could have been an insightful interrogation of a pertinent subject.

The problem lies in the sometimes skittish storytelling that sweeps us from point to point without ever really planting its feet anywhere. That leaves it feeling as if there’s far more to the story than we’re getting. The male characters are especially puzzling, often lurching from compassionate and supportive to diabolically vile without much dramatic notice. Never is this more true than in the last act when her billionaire backer and loyal ally Andrey Andreev (a hard to recognize Dan Stevens) becomes an enabling heel on a dime.

Much of those issues stem from the film’s obvious girl-boss aspirations. From all indications the filmmakers stretch the real-life story beyond its bounds in their efforts to emphasize empowerment. And despite delivering several piercing scenes showing the various shades of workplace misogyny, “Swiped” has a tendency of moving along too quickly rather delving deeper into the people involved. The shallow treatment isn’t just reserved for the sexist tech-bros. Later, Whitney meets and falls for a hunky cowboy (Pierson Fodé), a good catch with little personality and less agency who mostly lingers in the background.

Even with its flaws, “Swiped” quite easily holds your attention and it does a decent job getting its overall point across. The often underrated Lily James elevates the film on her own. And it’s worth telling the story of Whitney Wolfe Herd, a young woman from Salt Lake City who created her first startup in her dorm room before going on to become a successful groundbreaker for women in the tech space. Yet by the end, while I knew what Herd had endured and accomplished, I never felt like I really knew her. Another example of where a little more time and attention could have made a world of difference. “Swiped” releases September 19th exclusively on Hulu.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS

Taron Egerton has been enjoying quite a leading man run lately. In 2023 he shined in the surprisingly captivating biographical thriller “Tetris”. He followed in up in 2024 with the well-received “Carry-On”, a taut and tense Christmastime action thriller for Netflix. Now this year he’s back with “She Rides Shotgun”, a gritty crime thriller built around an emotional father-daughter story. The three performances couldn’t be more different. And they show off the 35-year-old’s impressive range.

“She Rides Shotgun” is based on Jordan Harper’s 2017 novel of the same name. In it, Egerton plays Nate, an ex-con trying to make a fresh start after his recent release from prison. The film opens with 9-year-old Polly (a superb Ana Sophia Heger) waiting for her mother to pick her up after school. But as time passes, she is surprised when her estranged father Nate arrives instead. He’s jittery and anxious and from all signs he’s driving a stolen car. A startled Polly reluctantly gets in and Nate takes off in a hurry.

This is Polly’s first time seeing her father since he got out of prison, and his cryptic speech and erratic behavior frightens her. Nate assures her that everything is ok, but their situation only gets stranger after he drives them to airport, ditches the car, and finds a motel for the night. While Nate sleeps, a television news broadcast reveals to Polly what her father has been hiding from her. She learns her mother and step-father were victims of a brutal double homicide and the police have Nate as their prime suspect.

Nate is forced to tell Polly the truth. While in prison he upset the wrong people leading to him and his family being marked for death. While he was unable to save his ex-wife, Nate is determined to protect his daughter at all costs, despite having few resources and no one he can trust. Now he and Polly are on the run from a corrupt sheriff and gang leader (played by a truly chilling John Carroll Lynch) who is willing to use any means to catch and kill them.

The movie has two facets that play out over the course of its rather lengthy two-hour runtime. The first is the thriller element which follows Nate and Polly as they’re on the run. The two stay on the move, from Santa Fe to Albuquerque, dodging crooked cops, contract killers, gang members, and one pesky detective (Rob Yang) who may or may not be their only ally in the entire Southwest. It’s certainly a competent thriller that can be both gripping and harrowing.

The second is the father-daughter dynamic which evolves over the course of their journey. Rowland along with screenwriters Ben Collins and Luke Piotrowski never lose sight of the troubled yet heartfelt central relationship. They don’t gloss over Nate’s weaknesses and shortcomings, yet they capture his love for his daughter which is seen most in his determination to protect her. The story routinely gives Nate and Polly moments to flesh out their circumstances. The rest comes from the rich performances from both Egerton and Heger.

My one big knock on the movie comes with its somewhat baffling ending that I still find myself wrestling with. From early on we get the sense that a violent confrontation is inevitable. The buildup is intense, but it wraps up with a well-intended yet head-scratching finish that I still don’t quite understand. Aside from that, “She Rides Shotgun” is a fittingly gritty and poignant redemption story with a distinct human pulse. And it’s yet another good showcase for Egerton who continues to build for himself an impressive résumé. “She Rides Shotgun” opens in theaters on August 1st.

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

The drama surrounding DC’s first attempt at a cinematic superhero universe is well-documented and going over the ins and outs of its rise and fall would take forever. In a nutshell, DC was put in the hands of Zack Snyder who attempted to do something to distinguish DC from its well-established competition at Marvel. The results were pretty great, that is until Snyder had the keys taken away in an effort to mirror Marvel’s success rather than offer a contrast to it. From there things fell apart pretty quickly.

Now DC is trying again by bringing in Marvel and DC alum James Gunn to head an entire reboot of their properties. For many of us, Gunn wasn’t the most encouraging choice considering his previous swings at franchise superhero movies (“Guardians of the Galaxy”, “The Suicide Squad”) were team-based stories laced with heavy amounts of humor. How that would translate to running a full-scale cinematic universe would be anyone’s guess.

Gunn kicks off his tenure by writing and directing DC’s signature character, Superman. Once again, Gunn isn’t the first person I would expect to be handed the keys to the iconic Man of Steel. But as a fan of the character and DC overall, I went in hopeful for a movie that would do him justice and get the DC Universe off on the right foot. Unfortunately, “Superman” quickly turns into a frustrating and often baffling mix of missteps and shortcuts.

“Superman” is riddled with nagging issues that include an overstuffed story, underdeveloped characters, head-scratching plot contrivances, and some needless liberties with the lore that fail to have the impact intended. Even worse, at times the movie feels as if it’s made for fans of James Gunn rather than fans of Superman. From the overly jokey tone to cameos featuring several of his buddies, you can often see Gunn more focused on putting his stamp on the property than telling a great Superman story.

Gunn starts by bypassing the origin stuff which most of us know by heart. His story is set three years after Superman (David Corenswet) first revealed himself to Earth. Apparently his most amazing feats happened in that three-year window prior to the events of the movie. I say that because we don’t get to see any of them. Instead we spend most of the time watching Superman getting beaten to a pulp. In fact, the very first scene has him crashing down after being destroyed by a metahuman working for billionaire Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult).

Speaking of Lex, here Superman’s powerful archenemy is turned into an underwritten brat whose motives are murky at best and incoherent at worse. Lex is already in a position of enormous power and influence, although how he got there is all but avoided. What we do learn is that he’s an arms dealer, he may be involved in a budding war between two neighboring nations, and he has a petty (masked as maniacal) hatred for Superman. Lex somehow has massive pull within the United States government and he can somehow sway public opinion just by appearing on a corny talk show.

Of course a big part of Superman’s story involves his life as Clark Kent. He’s once again a reporter at the Daily Planet alongside Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan). The movie begins with the two already romantically involved and with Lois aware of Clark’s superhero identity. Sadly their relationship doesn’t go anywhere beyond what we’ve seen before. Meanwhile the Daily Planet crew features such familiar names as editor-in-chief Perry White (Wendell Pierce), the busty Cat Grant (Mikaela Hoover), and Jimmy Olsen (Skyler Gisondo) who’s shackled to one of the film’s weirdest and most underdeveloped angles.

Adding to the assembly line of characters are three super-powered metahumans, Guy Gardner AKA Green Lantern (Nathan Fillion), Mr. Terrific (Edi Gathegi), and Hawkgirl (Isabela Merced). Guy calls them the “Justice Gang” which becomes a running joke that quickly runs out of gas. Nothing about them as a team seems thought out past the comic bits Gunn squeezes out of them. Only Mr. Terrific gets any meaningful time to semi-develop.

There are several other problems that are at least worth mentioning. There are some wonky digital effects. Nearly all the stakes come across as manufactured rather than organic. There is a surprising lack of emotion throughout the movie. Ma and Pa Kent are thrown in for sentimental effect but are glaringly inconsequential. Most of humanity are inadvertently depicted as insanely dumb and gullible. Even Krypto the dog is fumbled. He should be a cheap and easy way to get reactions from the audience. But Gunn doesn’t know when to let off the gas, and the CGI dog’s cutesy comic relief gets a bit old.

It pains me to say, but James Gunn’s “Superman” misses nearly every mark it aims for. And there are A LOT of marks as Gunn spends most of his time throwing ideas onto the screen rather than having them make sense within a cohesive story. He even takes an ax to some long-established lore only to get nothing out of it. Meanwhile the performances are simply fine, with no one being either terrific or terrible. To be fair, it’s no fault of the cast. It’s the writing and direction that lets them down.

Going back to my comic book days, I’ve long been a bigger fan of DC than Marvel. So much so that even with my concerns, I was willing to receive a new Man of Steel with open arms. But “Superman” is a disappointing reinvention of an iconic character so many love. In fact, calling this iteration “SUPERman” seems incredibly generous. Gunn’s attempts at capturing the essence of the character while shaping a new Superman in his image will probably payoff at the box office. But it’s hardly the fitting reintroduction this DC Comics pillar deserves. “Superman” is in theaters now.

VERDICT – 2 STARS

The “Tales” animated series has been a welcomed surprise to the ever-growing catalog of Star Wars canonical content. Created by Dave Filoni, each season of the short-form animated series consists of six episodes that explore two different story arcs. It debuted in 2022 with “Tales of the Jedi” which added backstory to prequel-era characters Ahsoka Tano and Count Dooku. The next installment was 2024’s “Tales of the Empire” which focused on the more deeply rooted Morgan Elsbeth and Barriss Offee.

The “Tales” series is very much aimed at heavily invested Star Wars fans. Ahsoka and Dooku are fairly well known names and both have established histories within the franchise. Their season had a broader appeal that could reach most levels of fandom. But “Tales of the Empire” honed in on more obscure characters with fewer connections for more casual fans. That didn’t bother me a bit. But for those less obsessed than I admittingly am, Season Two was a challenge (in addition to having one noticeably stronger arc than the other).

The new season, “Tales of the Underworld” finds itself somewhere in the middle. It highlights two Filoni fan favorites who will be foreign to those only familiar with the Star Wars movies. But if you’re a fan of Star Wars animation, you’ve undoubtedly heard of Asajj Ventress and Cad Bane. Ventress (voiced by Nika Futterman) was a one-time Jedi who turned to the Dark Side before eventually leaving the Sith to become a bounty hunter. Cad Bane (voiced by Corey Burton) was a ruthless bounty hunter and perpetual thorn in the Republic’s side during the Clone Wars.

The first three episodes are dedicated to Asajj Ventress and opens with a deep-cut that will thrill the most ardent of lore hounds (especially fans of Christie Golden’s 2015 novel “Star Wars: Dark Disciple”). Episode One begins with Quinlan Vos and Obi-Wan Kenobi returning a deceased Ventress back to her home planet of Dathomir. They leave after placing her body in a burial pool, but soon after she is resurrected by the spirits of the Nightsisters. From there the arc follows her life off the grid where she unexpectedly takes in a young Jedi on the run.

The next three episodes give us the origin story of Cad Bane. It begins by showing his life as a young orphan roaming the crime-riddled streets of Duro with his best friend Niro. The two are lured into helping a charismatic gangster named Laszlo. But during a job the two friends are separated. Cad escapes with Laszlo while Niro is arrested. Years later the two are reunited but on opposite sides of the law leading to a confrontation that will have a lasting impact on the future bounty hunter.

Both stories are equally compelling while also being quite different. The Ventress arc feels like a new chapter with an open-ended conclusion to be picked up later. It adds some new shades to Ventress who we last saw in the final season of “The Bad Batch”. Bane’s arc is every bit of an origin story that does a good job setting the table for the character he would become. Borrowing from classic spaghetti westerns and (more specifically) 1952’s beloved “High Noon”, Filoni and screenwriter Matt Michnovetz craft a rich and surprisingly mature arc.

As we’ve come to expect, “Tales of the Underworld” features crisp animation that stays true to Lucasfilm’s distinct and established style. The voice acting and sound design remains top notch while the storytelling expands the lore surrounding its two characters although in distinctly different ways. Again, there’s a chance of this only appealing to its core audience which I consider myself a part of. For others, finding connections could prove to be a chore. But I’m still glad things like this exist, adding depth to the already weighty Galaxy Far, Far Away.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

Kudos to Warner Bros. Pictures. They have hit all the right notes in promoting their latest big release, “Sinners”. Now for many of us, the reteaming of writer-director Ryan Coogler and actor Michael B. Jordan was the only selling point we needed. But the studio made their latest collaboration even more enticing with a pair of killer trailers and a series of brilliant posters. Best of all, “Sinners” absolutely delivers, often in ways I never expected.

What makes “Sinners” even more appetizing (especially for genre fans like me) is the crazy way it mixes the arthouse with the grindhouse. It’s a richly imagined movie dripping with cultural flavor and possessing a keen sense of time and place. It’s also a movie with a lot on its mind, using fairly obvious metaphors to make some equally obvious points. At the same time, “Sinners” turns into a blood-bathed vampire movie reminiscent of Robert Rodriguez’s “From Dusk till Dawn”.

Many will be surprised by how much time Coogler puts into building up his story and his characters. Well over half of the movie focuses on introducing characters, defining relationships, and immersing us in the vibrant period setting. By far this is when the movie is at its strongest. It’s a much different story for the inevitable payoff. The final siege is fittingly bloody and chaotic. But it’s also rushed – at times frantically edited and lacking logic in spots.

Set in Jim Crow-era 1932, the story takes place over the course of an eventful 24 hours in the rural town of Clarksville, Mississippi. Jordan mesmerizes with his dual lead performances. He plays Smoke and Stack, identical twin brothers who return to their hometown after some time in Chicago where they hustled, ran prostitution rings, and killed for mob boss Al Capone. With a pocket full of cash, Smoke and Stack buy an old mill from a shady businessman believed by some to have ties with the Ku Klux Klan. The brothers plan on turning the mill into a blues-centered juke joint, custom-made for the local black community.

The twins waste no time getting ready for their big opening night, hiring several local friends to chip in. They get food and a sign from a Chinese couple who owns a local grocery store, Grace and Bo Chow (played by Li Jun Li and Yao). Smoke convinces his estranged wife Annie (Wunmi Mosaku) to cook. They hire the brawny Cornbread (Omar Benson Miller) to man the door. Aged blues musician Delta Slim agrees to handle the music. And they bring along their young cousin Sammie (Miles Caton), a talented guitar player who dreams of becoming a blues singer despite the wishes of his preacher father.

As the joint opens and the raucous party gets underway, a few more key characters enter the mix. Namely the sultry Pearline (Jayme Lawson), a married woman who Sammie is instantly attracted to, and Mary (Hailee Steinfeld), a white woman who has a special relationship with Stack. Coogler infuses the club scenes with a raw yet infectious energy, oscillating between harmonious to hedonistic. The music soon becomes the centerpiece and it remains a key piece of the story throughout.

But the night takes a turn with the appearance of Remmick (Jack O’Connell), a smooth-talking Irish immigrant who says he was drawn to their shindig by Sammie’s hypnotic singing. In reality, Remmick is hiding a vicious secret. He and his two companions are actually vampires and he desperately wants inside to join the party. But if you’re remotely familiar with vampire movies, you know the rules. A bloodsucker can’t enter unless they’re invited. And that sets up a cultural/supernatural standoff that really ramps up the tension.

From the very start, it’s hard not to be absorbed in the period Coogler recreates. The locations, production design, costumes – it all feeds the movie’s striking authenticity. It’s all captured through Autumn Durald Arkapaw’s alluring lensing and surrounded by the scintillating music from Oscar-winning composer Ludwig Göransson. And everything is enhanced by the performances from a truly superb ensemble. It all begins and ends with Jordan who brings distinct intensity and personality to both Smoke and Stack.

But it’s Coogler’s uninhibited style and craftsmanship that makes “Sinners” a soulful, sumptuous, sexy, and sinister experience all its own. His story is rich and layered while his characters are fully formed and often complex with most living up to the film’s title. Yet while Coogler’s statements on America’s history are clear and insightful, some of his other points remain hazier and less impactful. Still, “Sinners” shows why Ryan Coogler is such an important filmmaker. And it once again shows the kind of magic he can muster whenever he connects with Michael B. Jordan.”Sinners” is in theaters now.

VERDICT – 4 STARS