Tom Holland once again separates himself from his friendly neighborhood superhero persona in the new Apple Original “Cherry”. Last year he did it with “The Devil All the Time”, a dark and violent Southern Gothic drama. Next to “Cherry” that flick plays like an afternoon special on the Disney Channel. This time Holland throws aside any hint of his boyish humor and Peter Park charm to wade into the heavy topics of drug abuse, dependency, PTSD, and more.
“Cherry” is directed by Marvel Studios favorites Anthony and Joe Russo. But make no mistake, there is nothing here that remotely resembles their rousing work in the MCU. Instead “Cherry” soaks its audience in unpleasantness from its dour and (mostly) hopeless point-of-view to the grating f-bomb laden dialogue from writers Angela Russo-Otstot and Jessica Goldberg. The Russos do try to inject a little dark humor here and there, but next to the story’s dark and depressing subject matter those brief moments are smothered out and forgotten. That’s all fine, but when the movie struggles to relay its bigger message or any real meaning those things become a liability and are harder to endure.

Image Courtesy of Apple
“Cherry” is based on Nico Walker’s semi-autobiographical 2018 novel of the same name. It’s a very real story for Walker who actually wrote his book from prison where he was serving 11 years for robbing banks to support his heroin habit. The movie breaks itself up into chapters that cover a young Ohio man’s troubled odyssey through college, army basic training, deployment, then back home where he gets hooked on drugs and begins robbing banks to support his addiction. And let me just say, in “Cherry” robbing banks is easier than shoplifting a piece of gum from a convenient store. No mask required, no police chase afterwards. Just be cordial, tell them you have a gun and they’ll hand over stacks of cash. Easy-peasy. It’s one of several things the movie serves up that strains any sense of believability.
Holland immerses himself in this character who starts down his tragic path by swapping Xanax for Ecstasy at college parties. But his life turns around when he meets the girl of his dreams Emily (Ciara Bravo), that is until she breaks his heart which leads to a spur-of-the-moment decision to enlist in the army. Then in the worst stroke of movie luck, Emily comes back to him but not before he’s set for basic training and then shipped to the Middle East in the latter days of the Iraq War. A large chunk of the movie (too large) follows his time as a barely trained medic and the horrors of the battlefield which lead to his PTSD.
From there it’s back home to Cleveland where Emily awaits and yet another lengthy chapter of the young man’s life begins. It’s here that the Russos vividly capture PTSD and the psychological damage it brings as well as the crushing effects of drug addiction. But no matter how hard he tries, or how much pale makeup they put on him, or how many f-bombs he screams, Holland never feels right for the part. It’s not for lack of commitment and it’s not that his performance is empty or feels untrue. He simple struggles to sell the grit and numbness the role demands. Same with Bravo. As with Holland, her performance isn’t “bad”. But (through no fault of her own) she looks 10 years too young and Bravo is handcuffed to Emily’s woefully shallow and hard-to-buy descent into addiction.

Image Courtesy of Apple
“Cherry” is also hampered by some weird creative choices such as its tone-jarring breaking of the fourth wall. In these scenes characters yank the movie out of the reality-based setting it so desperately wants to depict. It’s a style and storytelling choice that offers nothing and even the movie itself seems unconvinced of its effectiveness. Maybe that’s why it all but disappears in the film’s second half. And the decision to go with a chapter-based structure only highlights one of the movie’s bigger issues – its overwrought and overstuffed story. And speaking of style choices, did I mention there’s a shot from inside Holland’s rectum looking out? Cutting edge stuff, right?
There’s something undeniably disturbing about watching two young people who look like kids (even though both stars are in their twenties) losing themselves in a drug-addled mire of misery and self-destruction. But those aren’t the optics “Cherry” is going for. The Russos have bigger ambitions and shoot for the stars in what amounts to their attempt at a prestige movie. It’s them saying “See, we can make more than big-budget, crowd-pleasing, superhero extravaganzas“. The problem is “Cherry” is a mess. It’s story is overcooked, its storytelling hampered by bad decisions. Even worse, after watching it for 140 long minutes, I was completely indifferent to the characters, their story, and the film as a whole. That’s pretty damning, especially for a movie so sure of itself yet so emotionally hollow. “Cherry” opens February 26th in select theaters before streaming March 12th on Apple TV+.
I think it might do Holland some good to work with other directors, he seems in hock to the Russo clan.
Probably would. He once again shows Holland can act (for anyone who doubted), but this isn’t a step forward for him.
Pingback: REVIEW: “Cherry” (2021) – Kisafilms.com
I was hoping that it would be something different for both Holland and the Russo Brothers but after reading this. I’d think I’ll just watch something else as it’s a shame considering the amount of talent involved.
It’s a real shame and a big disappointment. It’s a hard movie to endure. I respect the willingness to do something new, but this wasn’t what I hoped for.
i believe you should watch it and form your own opinion instead of basing it off other people’s. i watched it and let me just say holland was perfect, his scenes where he’s suffering or taking drugs was amazing.
You really don’t understand film criticism at all.
So sorry to see it rated so low, was hoping Holland would do well with it.
Holland did his best. But I’m afraid he’s miscast here. But it’s the material that’s the real downer. I wish it were better but…
Have you noticed some actors do better with more dialogue and some do better with less? So far my impression of Holland is that he does better with less dialogue and more action.
Very interesting. I haven’t thought about that with Holland but now you have me wanting to pay it closer attention. Hmmm.
i watched it and i thought he was so so amazing. i could agree the movie was messy but that’s because of how the book played out. but tom holland was a standout and honestly did so amazing in all of his scenes
Thanks for reading and for the comments. I’m a Holland fan and my issues with him in this film really aren’t about anything he does or doesn’t do. I just think he’s miscast here and is given some material that would be really hard for anyone to sell. The movie’s main problems are in the script and the direction, not Holland.
I will watch it for sure as I like him.
He’s a good actor for sure. I’ll always remember him in “The Impossible”. Such a good performance and well before the MCU fame.
Looking forward to Spider-Man: No Way Home?
I am. I liked Holland’s last Spidey film so I’m anxious to see where things go.