REVIEW: “Chum” (2026)

“Chum” may be the most hilariously obvious title for a movie you’ll see all year, especially when you consider it’s a sharksploitation movie. Mixing bloody horror with thriller elements, sharksploitation has quickly developed into a genre all its own. Unfortunately the quality of the films being churned out as of late makes you wonder how long this genre will stay afloat. That is especially true for the astonishingly bad “Chum”.

Director and co-writer Jonathan Zuck takes a handful of well-worn ideas and a noticeably small budget to create “Chum”. Making a movie independently with very few resources is always impressive and admirable. Unfortunately “Chum” is a mess of a movie that struggles to function in its filmmaking and storytelling. And no matter how hard it tries (and to its credit, it really does try), the film delivers nothing in the way of legitimate thrills.

Image Courtesy of Independent Film Company

We meet Tina (Alice Eve) and Tom (Eric Michael Cole) at their lavish wedding reception in Malta. The two may have just exchanged their vows, but there is clearly a tension between them. We later find out why. Tina has been offered partner at her law firm. And she’ll be fast-tracked if she secures drilling leases in Alaska for a major oil company. Tom is an investment banker turned environmental crusader who is vehemently against her working on behalf of her client.

But for some reason they get married anyway, despite both being miserable. Even more, they reluctantly go out on a three-hour catamaran excursion planned and paid for by Tom’s best man, Rick (Johnny Gaffney). Joining the unhappy couple and Rick are their friends, Rachinda (Sarah Siadat) and Brittany (Lisa Yard), along with Tina’s moody and unsupportive younger sister, Sadie (Elle Haymond). Aside from their marriage woes, Tina is hesitant to go due to reports of an increase in shark attacks. But the Captain reassures her with a kiss of death – “There’s never been a shark attack in these waters.”

Sure enough, a ferocious man-eating shark attacks leading to a hilarious string of mishaps that leaves the Captain seriously injured and the boat on the verge of sinking. Thankfully they’re spotted by a fisherman named Roy (Jim Klock) who gets them to his boat as the digitalized shark circles them all in search of his next computer-generated meal. But as it turns out, Roy has a painful history with this particular shark. And the frightened friends quickly learn that Roy will do anything to get revenge for what the shark took from him.

Image Courtesy of Independent Film Company

Zuck and his co-writer Joe Leone throw us a twist that might be more effective if we hadn’t seen a variation of it in another shark movie just last year. But that aside, the film’s other problems mount fast. The performances are unconvincing at best as the cast tries to make something out of the clunky material. Their characters often sound like they’re reading off a page and their actions can be utterly baffling. And it doesn’t help that it all has the emotional impact of a cinder block. Nothing feels authentic or investment worthy.

Technically, it’s not much better. The ‘action’ scenes are littered with jarring cuts and odd uses of slow-motion. And the digital shark never looks real enough to be menacing. To cap it all off, the film ends with some awkwardly on-the-nose messaging that sinks any part of the movie that was left afloat. It’s a shame because a lot of effort went into getting the film made in spite of an obviously small amount of resources. But sadly nothing really works in this baffling misfire, which makes a lot of bad shark movies suddenly look better.

VERDICT – 1 STAR

First Glance: “The End of Oak Street”

I’ve been wildly curious about “The End of Oak Street” since its brief teaser dropped a couple of months back. Now Warner Bros. Pictures have released the first full trailer and I’m even more intrigued. This science-fiction survivor thriller comes from writer-director David Robert Mitchell, who gained a lot of attention for his 2014 horror film “It Follows” (a sequel is currently in the works with NEON producing and distributing). “The End of Oak Street” looks to be a MUCH different animal in size, scope, and scale.

Anne Hathaway and Ewan McGregor play Denise and Greg Platt, a husband and wife raising their two children in a quiet suburban neighborhood during the 1980s. But their unremarkable middle-class life is turned upside-down after a crazy cosmic event uproots Oak street and transports the neighborhood to someplace prehistoric. It’s a bonkers concept custom-made for the movies and it should be a lot of fun. The new trailer looks like an entertaining mix of “Jurassic Park” and “The Twilight Zone” with a strong family dynamic at its core. Sign me up.

“The End of Oak Street” arrives in theaters on August 14th. Check out the trailer below and let me know if you’ll be seeing it or taking a pass.

REVIEW: “Passenger” (2026)

“Passenger” is the latest feature from Norwegian filmmaker André Øvredal. It’s the follow-up to his criminally underrated 2023 film “The Last Voyage of the Demeter”, which was a narratively crafty and visually stunning adaptation of “The Captain’s Log”, a chapter from Bram Stoker’s 1987 classic novel “Dracula”. Without question, “Passenger” is a much different movie, yet it shows some of the same verve that made “Demeter” such a gem. If only it all came together as intended.

“Passenger” is a road-trip horror movie about a young couple who are pursued by a terrorizing supernatural entity. Written by Zachary Donohue and T.W. Burgess, the story follows the newly engaged Tyler (Jacon Scipio) and Maddie (Lou Llobell), who sell their Brooklyn apartment and leave the city for a life on the road. Six weeks into traveling the country and living out of their decked out van is everything Tyler had hoped it would be. But for Maddie, adjusting has been difficult.

Image Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

While driving down a dark rural road in Colorado (I think it was Colorado), they pull over to help a stranger who has crashed his car into a tree. But little do they know, by stopping they attract a malevolent entity that latches onto them. The first sign that something is amiss are the three parallel scratches carved deep into the side of their van – the same scratches that Maddie saw on the crash victim’s car. But this is a horror movie, so scratches are minor compared to what’s to come.

Maddie is first to begin seeing visions of a creepy old man with thin stringy hair, white pasty skin, and black hollowed eyes. But before long, so does Tyler. They learn the figure is an entity known as The Passenger, and it has stalked, haunted, and murdered a number of unfortunate travelers who dared to stop on the road at night. After surviving the demonic being’s first few attacks, Tyler and Maddie will need to find a way to kill it, before it adds them to its long list of victims.

Despite its feeling of familiarity, the story sets itself up nicely. The van-life angle is interesting, as is the clever way Øvredal, Donohue, and Burgess incorporate The Hobo Code into their tale of terrified travelers. Visually, Øvredal pulls off a number of cool tricks that I’m not sure I’ve seen before. One involves a rotating camera in a genuinely chilling parking lot sequence. Another makes wicked use of light from an outdoor movie projector.

Image Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

At the same time, the movie hits a wall past the midway point. It’s where the clichés begin to mount and the over-reliance on jump scares becomes too much. Melissa Leo is underused playing a kindly yet mysterious older woman who warns Tyler and Maddie to stay off “the quieter roads” after it’s too late. She vanishes as quickly as she came, only to briefly appear near the end of the movie to steer the desperate young couple towards a finish that just doesn’t generate the kind of tension or terror it needs to.

Ultimately “The Passenger” is a competently made and at times visually inspired horror film that simply runs out of original ideas before the final credits roll. Sharp direction and solid performances keeps us riding along with the film’s promising start. But over time we begin to feel the miles, as the journey we’re on runs out of interesting sites to see. There’s some good craftsmanship on display and a couple of gnarly scenes to enjoy. But in the end, “The Passenger” needs more to set itself apart.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Backrooms” (2026)

I’ve learned a lot since I started researching for this review. I learned there is something called “creepypasta” which are horror-centric urban legends or short stories created and then spread virally across the internet. Then I learned that the new film “Backrooms” was originally a YouTube anthological video series that was based on a creepypasta of the same name. I don’t pretend to fully understand how all of that works, but it does nonetheless.

The YouTube creator behind “Backrooms” is 20-year-old Kane Parsons. The success of his online creation has now blossomed into a feature film adaptation which he directs. It’s quite an accomplishment for a young man not even old enough to buy liquor here in the states. But don’t let his age fool you. Parsons proves to be a savvy young filmmaker with keen instincts and surprising courage, even if not everything in his debut feature fully clicks.

“Backrooms” is backed by several notable producers including James Wan, Shawn Levy, and Osgood Perkins. Parsons does the rest, carving out his audacious vision with the help of screenwriter Will Soodik and two fantastic leads in Chiwetel Ejiofor and Renate Reinsve. He uses every bit of his modest budget to shrewdly build upon his original online premise, expanding his claustrophobic and atmospheric world while adding in new layers of lore.

Image Courtesy of A24

Ejiofor plays Clark, a failed architect who owns a struggling Santa Clara Valley furniture store called Cap’n Clark’s Ottoman Empire. While Clark’s professional failures have left him bitter and frustrated, his biggest difficulty is with his recent divorce which has left him alone, living in his store. When he’s not drowning himself in liquor, Clark attends sessions with his therapist Mary (Reinsve). But he doesn’t find much comfort in them. Meanwhile Mary has buried trauma of her own that can be traced back to her troubled childhood.

While in his store’s basement, Clark makes an astonishing discovery. He notices a glimmer of light shining through a long vertical crack in the wall. While investigating it, Clark phases through the wall, coming out in what resembles an empty office space bathed in an overwhelming yellow tint. As he explores further he finds what seems to be an endless maze of connected liminal spaces, many with slight distortions such as upside down stairways or furniture clipping through the floor.

Clark escapes back through the extradimensional door and rushes to tell Mary about the “backrooms”. But she doesn’t believe him. So Clark recruits his assistant manager Kat (Lukita Maxwell) and her videographer boyfriend Bobby (Finn Bennett) to follow him through the portal and record their findings as proof of its existence. But as the trio pushes deeper into the backrooms, they encounter something terrifying. Later, after receiving a concerning voice message from Clark, Mary goes to the store to check on him. She finds the portal door and unknowingly enters into the nightmare.

Despite how it may sound, the premise is an unnerving one, specifically once Clark discovers the backrooms. The top-notch production design routinely takes minimalistic spaces and creates something eerily compelling for us to set our eyes on. And the sheer mystery of it all, especially for those like me who are unfamiliar with the online material, keeps us engaged and on the look out for any clues. Also, the sheer commitment of both Ejiofor and Reinsve proves to be crucial in selling us on the story.

Image Courtesy of A24

Unfortunately some of Parsons’ early choices bog things down during what should be key moments. Clark’s first encounter with the backrooms starts with a chilling sense of dread but turns into a lengthy time-muncher as we watch him slow-walk around rooms, down halls, through doors, and into more rooms. Later, during what is arguably the film’s most harrowing sequence, Parsons suddenly turns to a prolonged found-footage approach, even though it doesn’t make sense in the moment. I get that it’s a nod to the web series, but it shortchanges what could have been truly terrifying.

But part of what makes Parsons so impressive is that he never seems stuck in one mode. He’s consistently throwing in something new and unexpected. This is especially true in the film’s wickedly entertaining second half. It takes a truly gonzo turn as Parsons takes some wild swings that land with an impact somewhere between horrifying and hilarious. The intensity also ratchets up, culminating in a big final twist that turns everything on its head in a mostly satisfying way. In the final few minutes I was glued to every word, every hint, and every suggestion.

From all indications “Backrooms” is doing massive opening week numbers and that’s great to see. This sci-fi and psychological horror hybrid is the kind of highly original material that can energize moviegoers, and that certainly appears to be the case. It also ushers in a fresh, bold, and young new voice in Kane Parsons, who displays the kind of striking vision and go-for-broke confidence that leaves you eager to see what he delivers next. As for his debut, “Backrooms” is enthralling, aggravating, mysterious, and confounding. And after much deliberation, I can say with confidence that I pretty much loved it.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

RETRO REVIEW: “Commando” (1985)

On the front-end of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s near fifty-year acting career, after he had established himself in two Conan movies and took the world by storm in “The Terminator”, he released “Commando”. It was his first starring role (minus the docudrama “Pumping Iron”) that wasn’t science fiction or sword-and-sorcery. But that doesn’t mean there wasn’t an element of modern day fantasy to it. It was pure over-the-top 1980s popcorn action that audiences flocked to and that I still adore today.

“Commando” would be the biggest hit for director Mark L. Lester. It was one of several for screenwriter Steven Edward de Souza whose high-profile action resume also includes the first two Die Hard films, “The Running Man”, and “48 Hrs.” (yes, there’s also “Hudson Hawk”, but we’ll save that for a later Retro Review). Together they took a story idea conceived by Jeph Loeb for Kiss bassist Gene Simmons (!!) and retailored it for Schwarzenegger’s obvious strengths.

In 1985, Schwarzenegger was at his physical peak, and Lester utilized it to a near comical effect. From the early shots of Arnie quite literally carrying a tree, to him running onto the beach in a tiny Speedo, Schwarzenegger was a formidable specimen. Yet what really drew him to the role was the opportunity to play a father. Sure, he’s also a one-man killing machine who can fling an occupied phone booth and roll over sports cars with his bare hands. But the role allowed him to show a human side which he appreciated.

Image Courtesy of 20th Century Studios

Schwarzenegger plays John Matrix (the perfect 80s action movie name), a retired Army colonel who has left his life in the Special Forces to raise his young daughter Jenny (Alyssa Milano). Together they live a quiet and happy life in their remote rustic home in the mountains of upstate California. But their idyllic and slightly cheesy existence is interrupted when Matrix is visited by his former commander, General Franklin Kirby (James Olson), who warns him that members of his former unit have been systematically murdered.

With Kirby barely out of sight, Matrix’s home is attacked by mercenaries who kidnap him and his daughter. The man behind it all is General Arius (Dan Hedaya), a former South American despot who wants Matrix to kill his small country’s president so he can retake power. With the help of Matrix’s maniacal former squad-mate Bennett (Vernon Wells), Arius transports Jenny to his fortified island compound, using her as leverage to keep Matrix in line.

Accompanied by one of Arius’ henchmen, Matrix is put on a commercial plane bound for South America and his presidential target. But he gives the goon the slip (via a cracked neck) and hops off the plane just as it’s taking off. That leaves him with eleven hours until the plane lands and Arius is alerted that he isn’t onboard. And he will need every minute of those eleven hours to locate Arius’ compound and to make his way there to save his daughter.

After its fast and violent setup, “Commando” settles into an interesting rhythm as Matrix begins piecing together a trail of clues that he hopes will lead him to Jenny. It’s here that the supporting cast gets even better. Matrix finds an ally in a reluctant flight attendant named Cindy (Rae Dawn Chong) who adds some levity while still getting in way over her head. We also get a couple of terrific heavies including the delightfully slimy Sully (David Patrick Kelly) and the intense and menacing Cooke (the great Bill Duke).

Image Courtesy of 20th Century Studios

“Commando” is an action movie through and through. But Lester and de Souza leave plenty of room for laughs. Admittedly some are unintentional and have even grown endearing over the years. But others can be organically funny – none better than the many one-liners. “He’s dead tired.”, “I lied.”, “I let him go.” – just some of the deliberately goofy bits that remain memorable after all these years.

But it all does come back to the action which we get in spades during the film’s final twenty minutes. That’s when Matrix and his arsenal of machine guns, rocket launchers, grenades, shotguns, sawblades, pitchforks, and claymores tears through Arius’ army of fodder to the audience’s delight. It’s non-stop carnage with a body count topping one hundred, yet its a wonderfully fitting finish for a movie that does a good job building up to its inevitable end.

“Commando” is a certainly a movie of its time. But is says something that it’s still revered by so many today. As I said, it’s pure popcorn entertainment that fans love for its artery-clogging cheese just as much as its wild over-the-top action. And it was the perfect vehicle for the fairly fresh Arnold Schwarzenegger who would immediately follow the film with hits like “Predator”, “The Running Man”, “Total Recall” and so many more.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

Character Posters Drop for “Masters of the Universe”

I’ll be perfectly honest, I don’t know what to expect from the upcoming “Masters of the Universe”. I’m simply not sure what kind of demand there is for a movie based on a 1980s animated series and Mattel toy line. Yes I know there have been several animated revivals over the last forty years. But most remember it from its 80s heyday that saw the franchise make the jump from comics to television, and even spawn a not-so-great 1987 feature film starring Dolph Lundgren. But in 2026? I don’t know.

But hats off to Amazon MGM Studios for rolling the dice and bringing a “Masters of the Universe” to the big screen. And they aren’t taking the cheap route. The movie is said to have a $200 million production budget, and director Travis Knight has put together a rather compelling cast that includes Nicholas Galitzine, Jared Leto, Idris Elba, Alison Brie, Camila Mendes, Morena Baccarin, Kristen Wiig, James Purefoy, and Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson.

In the end, my curiosity is more than enough to lead me to the theater, mainly as a fan of classic sword-and-sorcery films rather than the franchise itself. And the promotion for the film has been fun. Case in point – the eighteen (yes, EIGHTEEN) cool character posters that have been dropped ahead of the film’s June 5th release. Check them out below and let me know what you think. Also, how excited are you to see a new big screen adaptation of “Masters of the Universe”?