REVIEW: “Silent Night” (2023)

In the world of action cinema few have left a mark like John Woo. For 55 years the revered filmmaker has put together quite the résumé from his Hong Kong classics such as “The Killer” and “Hard Boiled” to his stateside hits like “Hard Target”, “Broken Arrow”, “Face/Off”, and “Mission: Impossible II”. Woo’s distinct style has been emulated by the likes of Quentin Tarantino, Robert Rodriguez, and Michael Bay. And his influence can be seen in everything from “The Matrix” to the John Wick films.

After a lengthy hiatus, the legendary 77-year-old auteur is back with “Silent Night”. It’s Woo’s first American feature film in twenty years but fans shouldn’t worry. His signature aesthetic is once again on bold display in this blistering action thriller shrewdly built around a mostly dialogue-free script. That’s quite a challenge, but screenwriter Robert Archer Lynn has crafted a smart and sturdy framework. From there, Woo handles the rest, delivering on everything you would expect from a film with his name stamped on it.

The movie is led by a perfectly cast Joel Kinnaman who can effortlessly emit intensity like few others. He plays Brian Godlock and Woo wastes no time revealing the tragedy that will drive his damaged protagonist throughout the story. Within the opening few minutes Brian and his wife Saya (an excellent Catalina Sandino Moreno) have their happy lives suddenly and irreparably shattered.

Image Courtesy of Lionsgate

On Christmas Eve while playing with their young son Taylor in their front yard, a stray bullet from a gunfight between two warring street gangs hits Taylor and kills him. An enraged Brian chases the thugs down only to be shot in the throat and left for dead by their vicious leader (Harold Torres). Brian survives and eventually recovers physically, but he can no longer speak. On top of that, once home from the hospital he’s forced to face the painful reality that his beloved son is gone.

First Brian goes into mourning, cutting himself off from his wife while attempting to drown his sorrow in booze. But when that doesn’t work his sadness turns into rage, sending him on a bullet-riddled and blood-drenched quest for revenge. Brian decides to hunt down and kill the gangbangers responsible for his boy’s death. He gives himself nearly a year to plan, prepare and train, marking Christmas Eve as the day he will avenge the killing of his son.

As with so many of his past films, Woo puts a lot of effort into setting up the big action. Pacing has always been key to his approach and here Woo steadily ratchets up our anticipation, building towards the story’s inevitable ultra-violent crescendo. From there it’s vintage Woo as our silent protagonist unleashes his pain through a number of fierce and kinetic set pieces. They include wild car chases, brutal fight scenes, and incredibly choreographed shootouts that are almost operatic in their design.

Image Courtesy of Lionsgate

As you watch these spectacular scenes play out, Woo’s trademark style can be seen everywhere. From techniques such as his frequent use of slow-motion and shooting single scenes from multiple angles, to staples such as duel-wielding handguns, Mexican standoffs, and his symbolic use of birds. Once it kicks into gear the action is non-stop. It’s brutality is matched by its artistry. Yet it’s undergirded by a surprising amount of heart and humanity.

While’s Woo’s craftsmanship is clearly a draw, Kinnaman proves to be an essential ingredient. His ability to channel pain and vulnerability adds pathos while his physicality combined with a palpable fury energizes the action. And amazingly it’s all conveyed with no dialogue whatsoever. Moreno is great in her small but meaningful role, and an underused Scott “Kid Cudi” Mescudi is solid (with what little he’s given) as a local police detective. But Kinnaman is the force who bring’s Woo’s vision to life.

“Silent Night” advertises itself as an alternative holiday movie of sorts with its witty title and killer trailer that utilized all kinds of Christmas motifs. But deep down it’s a visceral no-nonsense revenge thriller with a clever twist made by a filmmaker who once helped revolutionize a genre. “Silent Night” may not have the kind of landscape altering impact of Woo’s more celebrated films, but it’s a firm (and thoroughly entertaining) reminder of why he is rightly lauded as a legend of action cinema.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

REVIEW: “The Promised Land” (2023)

The ever magnetic Mads Mikkelsen delivers yet another awards worthy turn in “The Promised Land”, a Danish historical drama based on Ida Jessen’s book “The Captain and Ann Barbara”. Directed and co-written by Nikolaj Arcel, “The Promised Land” is the kind of sweeping period epic that doesn’t come around much these days. There’s a classical form to its storytelling yet its sturdy framework allows Arcel to push a few boundaries.

Arcel and his co-writer Anders Thomas Jensen set their story in 18th century Denmark where a proud war veteran, Captain Ludvig Kahlen (Mikkelsen) has returned home after 25 years of military service which included fighting in the Silesian Wars. Ludvig is a patriotic yet ambitious man whose love for country is only outdone by his desire to be recognized by it. Though left to live in a crowded poorhouse for vets, his desire is to gain the attention of the king and be granted status among the society’s elite. And he has a plan to do it.

In order to get things rolling Ludvig will need to do some persuading. He presents his plan to the king’s royal cabinet and seeks their permission to establish a colony in the treacherous heath of Jutland. It’s a vast and forbidding part of the country noted for the brutal elements, barren soil, and violent outlaws who terrorize those who dare venture into it.

Image Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

Though considered untamable, Ludvig is convinced he can earn the favor of his king by building the first heath settlement. He even agrees to finance it with his meager captain’s pension. All he wants in return is “a noble title, along with an estate manor and servants.” The rulers agree (for their own self-serving reasons) and soon Ludvig is setting out to stake his claim.

After finding a patch of land, Ludvig goes looking for workers to help him get up and running. But finding laborers willing to risk the heath is no easy task. Among the few he gathers is a young couple, Johannes (Morten Hee Andersen) and his wife Ann Barbara (Amanda Collin) who we learn have been on the run from a cruel land baron. They’ve remained hidden thanks to a good-hearted young priest named Anton (Gustav Lindh) and now head out into the wild with Ludvig.

The ragtag group’s presence in the heath catches the attention of Frederik De Schinkel (Simon Bennebjerg), a rich and merciless nobleman who has declared the land his own. De Schinkel first tries intimidation and later coercion. But the steadfast Ludvig stands his ground. “It’s the king’s land. I work for the king.” This sets in motion the film’s fierce central conflict that quickly intensifies from posturing to all-out brutality.

Image Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures

From the very outset Arcel captures time and setting with impressive period detail. But it’s once we’re thrust into the heath that the film’s visuals are magnified. The harshness of the land is exquisitely realized through DP Rasmus Videbæk’s camera. But he also captures beauty in the stark rugged landscapes. Even more, Arcel and Videbæk often use the camera to paint striking visual contrasts between Ludvig’s arduous life on the heath and De Schinkel’s lavish excesses. Much like Ludvig’s lofty dreams of privilege juxtaposed with his much different reality.

Among the most compelling aspects of the story is Ludvig’s early delusions of grandeur. Despite the meagerness of his accommodations, Ludvig is stern and demanding, as if he’s living a life of nobility in his mind. He insists that his food be served a certain way and cooked to his strict specifications. He even names his new homestead King’s House, obviously named out of his loyalty to his king but perhaps also a reflection of his own blind ambition.

But reality can be a sobering thing. For Ludvig it comes at the hands of the very elites he has longed to be a part of. There’s also the addition of an abandoned child named Anmai Mus (Melina Hagberg) who adds some unexpected emotional layers to the story. Through it all Mikkelsen maintains a captivating presence. No one does steely and stoic like the 58-year-old Dane. And few can say as much through an ice cold, granite-hard stare. Arcel knows what he has in his star and uses him as an anchor for what is one of the year’s best films.

VERDICT – 4.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Napoleon” (2023)

I admit, it brings my heart joy that at 85 years old the great Ridley Scott is still making movies. And not just run-of-the-mill movies, but big, sweeping, and ambitious movies. He’s the filmmaker behind such memorable favorites as “Alien”, “Blade Runner”, “Gladiator”, “Black Hawk Down”, and “The Martian”. And that’s only a sample size from what is a stellar 46-year filmography.

“Napoleon” sees the prominent director working comfortably inside his wheelhouse. It’s a massive historical epic that tells the story of the eponymous French emperor through Scott’s uniquely cinematic lens. He hits on handpicked high and low points in Napoleon’s life as a brilliant military strategist, an overly zealous ruler, and an insecure husband to Empress Josephine. It’s a crazy mixture of psychological study and made-for-the-big-screen spectacle. Best of all it sees Scott tossing the conventional biopic formula to the wind. The results are a little messy. But so was Napoleon.

Image Courtesy of Apple Original Films

Scott’s approach to telling Napoleon’s story is a lot like reading CliffsNotes. It gives you a general idea but it’s far from the full picture. It’s an approach that works in several ways, but that also gives rise to what becomes the movie’s biggest problem. Scott and screenwriter David Scarpa rapidly hop from one historical point to the next, bypassing important information needed to make the scenes feel connected. So we end up with a movie of loosely tethered vignettes.

This becomes more of a problem as the film progresses. I found myself routinely questioning how we got from there to here, what brought this situation on, where did that person go, etc. Major events such as Napoleon’s rise to emperor, his exile to Elba, and Josephine’s final days are mere blips and get no buildup and very little explanation. Meanwhile the many supporting characters have a hard time registering because so little is shared about them. In most cases we have no idea who they are outside of having their name stamped on the screen when they first appear.

In what may be a hurdle for some, “Napoleon” is marked by some wild shifts in tone. But Scott knows what he’s doing. He strategically uses them as a means to both elevate and mock his notorious subject. It results of some scenes of unbridled intensity while others are laced with jolts of unexpected humor. It gives the movie a quirkiness that (in its own peculiar way) works very well.

And then you have the spectacular battle sequences – Ridley Scott’s bread and butter. To no surprise they are fierce, violent, and immaculately presented. Surprisingly we don’t get many of them. There’s the Siege of Toulon, the Battle of Austerlitz, and of course Waterloo. None of them get much of a buildup, but once Scott is on the battlefield he’s clearly in his comfort zone. What follows is extraordinary.

Image Courtesy of Apple Original Films

As for Napoleon himself, Joaquin Phoenix (mumbling aside) is a solid fit for showing off the strengths, weaknesses, and all-out eccentricities of the infamously complex ruler. Though several years older than Napoleon for the bulk of the movie, Phoenix proves to be the right guy for Scott’s portrayal which has no interest in empathy or glorification. Vanessa Kirby is equally good as the equally contradictory and ultimately tragic Josephine. So much so that we’re left wishing she had more screen time.

The lavish set designs, exquisite costuming, and the overall grand scale, added to the inherently fascinating story of Napoleon Bonaparte, makes Ridley Scott’s latest an automatically intriguing endeavor. But the movie demands (at the very least) a working knowledge of the brutish but passionate sovereign and his toxic yet intimate relationship with Josephine. Without it chances are high that “Napoleon” will leave you more confused rather enlightened. “Napoleon” is in theaters now.

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

Happy Thanksgiving!

It’s Thanksgiving here in States, a time where we get together to celebrate all that we’re thankful for. For many of us it’s a fun-filled day of family, food, and football (and for me a movie or two – after all awards season is quickly approaching). So for those celebrating the holiday, I want to wish you and yours a very Happy Thanksgiving. And for EVERYONE, thank you for all the time you’ve spent reading, following, liking, and commenting on this goofy little site. I can’t express how thankful I am for you.

Again, have a wonderful Thanksgiving and a joyful holiday season!

REVIEW: “Saltburn” (2023)

We get yet another takedown of the rich and privileged in Emerald Fennell’s proudly smutty satire “Saltburn”. Excoriating the wealthy on the big screen has almost become old hat. But that hasn’t stopped filmmakers from beating that familiar drum, often to their own tunes. In “Saltburn” Fennell’s tune is more of an obnoxious drone – a persistent clamor of shallow, uninspired revelry and shock value hiding behind a beautifully shot veneer.

Fennell’s 2020 feature film debut “Promising Young Woman” was a sassy and sharp-edged thriller that had something to say. It was gutsy, provocative, and timely, taking on warped views of masculinity with its fists clenched and a twinkle in its eye. “Saltburn” is quite the opposite. It’s a mostly rhythmless confection that’s obsessed with its own coolness and edginess. Its intentions are rarely a mystery and its salacious swings at provocation offer little more than smug and hollow commentary at best.

Image Courtesy of Amazon MGM Studios

Fennell certainly has the star power starting with her Oscar-nominated lead, Barry Keoghan. He plays Oliver Quick, a studious outcast in his first year at Oxford University. It doesn’t take long for the quiet and unassuming Oliver to earn our sympathies, especially after we hear that he’s an only child and is estranged from his parents due to their mental health and addiction issues. But we feel for him even more after he becomes enamored with the hunky, popular, and extremely wealthy Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi).

The two meet after Oliver helps Felix out of a jam. Oliver desperately wants into Felix’s upper-class social circle. Felix seems sympathetic, especially after Oliver gets word that his father has died. The two form a friendship although the depth of it is never really clear (well, maybe in the final 15 minutes). As finals approach Felix makes a rather spontaneous gesture. He invites Oliver to spend the summer with him and his family at their lavish estate called Saltburn.

Things are going pretty good up to this point. But from the moment Felix introduces Oliver to his family at Saltburn, Fennell begins losing her grip. Her story turns out to be pretty barebones and basic but surprisingly ends up woefully underserved. That’s because Fennell loses her creative self within this glaringly phony world of debauchery and opulence. As a result, things like narrative structure, story progression, and character development get tossed aside for warped and edgier grasps for attention.

Among the casualties of Fennell’s overcooked hankering to push the envelope are the characters themselves. Take Felix’s aristocratic family: his wild-haired father Sir James Catton (Richard E. Grant), his oblivious mother Lady Elsbeth (Rosamund Pike), his indolent sister Venetia (Alison Oliver), and his freeloading cousin Farleigh (Archie Madekwe). In a way each of them serve their purpose. But they’re little more than disposable playthings for Fennell to toy around with and disregard. And none of them ever grow beyond what we initially learn of them. Felix – spoiled beyond his own comprehension but with a heart of gold – is easily the most compelling.

Image Courtesy of Amazon MGM Studios

As for Keoghan, he certainly commits to Fennell’s twisted vision. The Irish actor is no stranger to playing off-center characters who sheepishly skulk around on the periphery. But here the material is so lacking that his eventual transformation from meek and nebbish into something more devious and depraved is a hard sell. This is especially true in the final act where Fennell rushes to bring Oliver’s story to some kind of credible conclusion. But it’s so lazy and outlandish. Even worse, Fennell spoon-feeds us every single answer, leaving nothing for the imagination.

The movie ends with an eye-rolling, self-indulgent final sequence that’s a perfect encapsulation of everything wrong with “Saltburn”. It’s a doltish and pointless finish that reveals a filmmaker more infatuated with kinky excesses than satisfying storytelling. And that’s a shame because we get teases of a better movie. And Fennell’s shrewdness with the camera is undeniable. But that’s nowhere near enough to save this narcissistic poster child for style over substance. “Saltburn” is now showing in select theaters.

VERDICT – 1.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Tiger 3” (2023)

Action movies are plentiful and they exist in all shapes and sizes. So many of them come and go without ever leaving a mark. But there’s something to be said for those that create and embrace their own corner of the genre. You could make a good case that Aditya Chopra and Yash Raj Films has done that with their gleefully stylish, unashamedly over-the-top, and immensely fun YRF Spy Universe.

The latest installment in the lucrative and ever-growing shared universe is “Tiger 3”, the fifth feature in this series of spy action films chronicling the adventures of various fictional RAW agents. Directed by Maneesh Sharma, “Tiger 3” is a sequel to 2017’s “Tiger Zinda Hai” and follows the events of 2019’s “War” and this year’s “Pathaan”. It sees the return of the effortlessly charismatic Salman Khan as RAW agent Avinash “Tiger” Singh Rathore and Katrina Kaif as his wife and ISI agent Zoya.

“Tiger 3” delivers everything fans love about the Spy Universe’s high-octane brand of action but on an even bigger scale. The signature style, the self-aware swagger, the rousing music, and most of all the huge electrifying set pieces – it’s all here in spades. As for the story, it works under a pretty basic premise. But it’s a premise that does what it needs to – set the table for the action while throwing in a few surprises along the way.

Image Courtesy of Yash Raj Films

Written for the screen by Shridhar Raghavan from a story by Chopra, “Tiger 3” incorporates a number of frequently used spy movie angles. And while it may not stray from the Spy Universe’s distinct formula, it remains an absolute blast, fueled by some of the best action sequences you’ll see this year and driven by Khan and Kaif’s attention-grabbing presences.

Well-versed Spy Universe fans will be quite familiar with the movie’s narrative framework. There are twists, turns, and betrayals. There is globetrotting, espionage, and political power grabs. Of course there are also fierce shout-outs, kinetically choreographed fight scenes, and moments of jaw-dropping action that simply defies explanation in such a small space. And how can I forget another power-mad villain, this time with deep personal connections to our two protagonists.

While none of those things feel particularly new, Sharma and Raghavan weave a good story around their two characters who many of us have grown to love. The story begins with a prologue that introduces us to Aatish Rehman (a terrific Emraan Hashmi), an ex-ISI agent and Zoya’s former mentor. When Rehman goes rogue Zoya is forced to expose him, ending in his imprisonment for treason.

Image Courtesy of Yash Raj Films

Jump to the present day where Tiger, Zoya, and their tween son Junior (Sartaaj Kakkar) live a cozy life in Austria. But when a friend and fellow agent is killed and questions of Zoya’s loyalties arise, Tiger is forced to investigate. The trail he follows leads to a shocking discovery – Aatish is free and has kidnapped and drugged Junior. He uses their son to force Tiger and Zoya to pull off a daring heist in exchange for an antidote. They succeed, but in the process unknowingly hand over nuclear launch codes to Aatish and his extremists. In the meantime Aatish frames them and soon they are wanted by both the Indian and Pakistani governments.

In addition to India, Pakistan, and Austria, the movie jets us to other exciting locations including St. Petersburg, Russia and Istanbul, Turkey. And as Tiger and Zoya attempt to clear their names they also fight to figure out and thwart Aatish’s plan. To do so requires the help of a few old friends. And it all builds up to an epic-sized showdown that plays out just as we expect but is still loads of fun nonetheless.

“Tiger 3” is a thrilling new installment in a cinematic universe that has no illusions about what it is. The film is pure action spectacle but with enough story (predictable as it may be) to keep you engaged. Khan still has the coolness and physicality to carry the movie, but he doesn’t do it alone. Kaif matches him line for line and scene for scene. In fact, there are times when she’s easily the most compelling and exciting person on screne. What matters most is that they’re great together, and I’ll go wherever their next adventure takes them. “Tiger 3” is in theaters now.

VERDICT – 4 STARS