REVIEW: “Death Proof”


Quentin Tarantino’s weirdly audacious “Death Proof” is yet another example of the acclaimed filmmaker recapturing a slice of cinema history. This time he sets his sights on the old grindhouse theater experience. “Death Proof” released in theaters in 2007 as one-half of a schlocky B-movie twin-billing (Robert Rodriguez’s “Planet Terror” was the other film). This was common for the grindhouses that popped up throughout the 70’s but were mostly gone by the late 90’s.

For the most part grindhouse movies were cheaply made exploitation flicks, notorious for their low production value and bad print quality. “Death Proof” sees Tarantino attempting to capture two key facets of the genre. He writes his screenplay to resemble a bad movie you would see in those cut-rate theaters. But he puts just as much effort into making his film look and sound like it has been pulled from a time capsule. Crackling audio, grainy video, missing frames – it all makes for an eye-catching aesthetic which is inexplicably dropped around the midway point for no discernible reason at all.

“Death Proof” is a film of two halves. Both have striking similarities yet one is considerably stronger than the other. The first half starts with three friends Arlene, Shanna and Julia (Vanessa Ferlito, Jordan Ladd, and Sydney Tamilia Portier) heading to a bar on the outskirts of Austin, Texas. There they meet up with Lanna (Monica Staggs) and the four begin their night of partying.


Unfortunately for them they also meet a grizzled Hollywood stuntman appropriately named Stuntman Mike (a fantastic Kurt Russell). He’s an odd bird with a clear affection for menacing muscle cars and messy nachos. He takes notice of the young women in the bar and after a handful of snappy back-and-forths filled with Tarantino’s signature dialogue, the four friends drive off into the night. Unfortunately for them so does Stuntman Mike.

Up to this point “Death Proof” is hitting most of its marks. Aside from being fairly shallow and unashamedly trashy, Tarantino creates a cool blend of nostalgia and style that allows him to show off his inner film student. So much of what he does both technically and narratively hearkens back to the grindhouse genre. And his character work is equally effective. This is especially true for Russell who has a ton of fun in a role that seems custom-made for him.

If things ended there it would be a pretty satisfying foray into B-movie exploitation cinema. But there is the second half  and that is where the film’s momentum grinds to a halt. There is this weird transition that takes place both visually and from a story standpoint. Tarantino jumps ahead fourteen months and moves from Austin to Lebanon, Tennessee. He moves his focus to four new women played by Rosario Dawson, Tracie Thomas, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and Zoe Bell. They each work in the movie business (two of them stunt drivers) and are on break from a nearby film shoot.


Unfortunately their story is pretty lightweight. Tarantino is never able to muster a reason for us to be interested in them aside from their no-nonsense, tough-as-nails personalities. This is perhaps best illustrated in a diner scene clearly influenced by “Reservoir Dogs” down to the way it’s shot. It’s a drawn-out dialogue-driven sequence that could have worked if the characters had anything interesting to say. It’s a real momentum killer.

We’re left hungering for their inevitable encounter with Stuntman Mike who once again has his eyes set a group of unsuspecting young women. The big difference here is that these women fight back. It leads to the much talked about finale featuring some impressive practical effects and classic stuntwork despite being utterly ridiculous. It makes for a mildly satisfying ending but nothing particularly memorable.

And that’s something that could be said about “Death Proof” as a whole. Despite it’s throwback cinema bells and whistles, a pretty good first half, and a really fun Kurt Russell performance, the movie ends up losing steam and the second half can’t maintain the spark of the first 45 minutes or so. It’s a shame because there are some fun, nostalgic ideas throughout. But they aren’t enough to keep Tarantino’s eyes on the road.



10 thoughts on “REVIEW: “Death Proof”

  1. I think in its extended standalone film, it’s Tarantino’s weakest film of his career but… I loved it. I just love how dark and seedy the first half is and then it kind of shifts into something lighter in the 2nd half as it relates to what Stuntman Mike wants to do and target his prey thinking he could it all over again. Boy was he wrong!

    As part of Grindhouse with Planet Terror and the fake trailers for Machete, Werewolf Women of the S.S. featuring Nicolas Cage as Fu Manchu directed by Rob Zombie, Eli Roth’s Thanksgiving, and Edgar Wright’s Don’t. It is a cinematic experience for the ages and certainly one of my all-time favorite moments I had in watching a film.

    If you were to ask me which version of Death Proof I prefer, I’d say the shortened theatrical version that was part of Grindhouse.

    • For me the second half was frustrating and a drag. The cast was good and I liked how it ended. But I felt Tarantino really struggled to give any of them any depth. And Mike is all but tossed aside until he suddenly pops back up in his car. I do bet the full grindhouse experience was cool to watch.

      • It’s a shame the film didn’t do well though looking back, I think audiences were really lost on the whole concept of seeing two films as I remembered that after Planet Terror during its credits, half of the audience had left either not understanding the concept or just didn’t enjoy it. Those such as myself who stayed were in for a ride and we all jumped out of our seats and cheered during the film’s ending of Death Proof.

  2. Don’t think I watched the Tarantino half of this release, but the other one was pretty fun, you know, a girl with a machine gun for a leg, plus zombies, can’t go wrong with that sort of thing.

  3. I agree with your excellent review. Up until the incredible car crash it’s a really great B-movie homage but really falls away after that, as you say. Planet Terror is way more satisfactory horror/comedy film. Some fantastic action and gore too.

    • That second half just sucks the air right out of the film. It more or less flatlines and QT is never able to capture what he did in the first half. It’s a shame.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s