REVIEW: “Next Goal Wins” (2023)

My biggest question going into “Next Goal Wins” was simple. Is this a return to form for director Taika Waititi. The director of such deliciously quirky treats such as “What We Do in the Shadows”, “Hunt for the Wilderpeople”, and “Jojo Rabbit” found himself drawn into the moneymaking blockbuster machine known as the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The results weren’t great. “Thor: Ragnarok” was tolerable yet frustrating. “Thor: Love and Thunder” was an abysmal mess.

So following on the heels of “Love and Thunder” is the feel-good sports comedy “Next Goal Wins”. So I ask again – is it a return to form for the undeniably talented Waititi? Well, not exactly. Instead it’s a mind-boggling misfire that sees the filmmaker more absorbed in his preoccupations than with telling a good story. It’s even more bewildering that a filmmaker so notorious for doing his own thing would make a film this glaringly by the numbers.

Image Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures

The movie has a great lead in Michael Fassbender and the story (written by Waititi and Iain Morris) starts promising. Inspired by true events and (at least for a time) laced with Waititi’s wacky sense of humor, “Next Goal Wins” sees Fassbender playing Thomas Rognen, a volatile American soccer coach on the outs with the United States Soccer Federation. But rather than straight-up fire him, the board, which includes his estranged wife and her new beau (played by the woefully underused Elisabeth Moss and Will Arnett), assign him to the most undesirable job in all of football.

In the 2001 World Cup Qualifiers the American Samoa national team suffered the worst defeat in the history of international football – a 31-0 drumming by Australia. Believe it or not, since then they’ve only gotten worse. In fact, we learn they’ve never scored a goal in the history of their team. Enter the boozy, soured, and frustrated Thomas who has been sent to American Samoa to coach their national team.

Early on Waititi teases us with an amusing fish out of water culture-clash comedy. There are some hilarious bits with Fassbender’s embittered and self-centered Thomas clanging against the deeply religious and hard-working Samoan locals. Equally funny are some of the early scenes with Thomas and his team, a talentless but good-hearted bunch who are as bad on the field as their reputation says. Yet they never lose the support of Tavita (Oscar Kightley), the President of the Football Federation of American Samoa who gives Thomas a single task – just score one goal.

But this is where the storytelling starts to go off track as Waititi’s more obsessive interests derail other facets of his movie. Take Thomas and his team. You would think their relationships would form the core of the story. Well, they do but only in a broad sense. Instead Waititi gets caught up in telling an on-the-nose side story involving a transitioning faʻafafine player named Jaiyah (played by Kaimana). So much so that most of the other players are nothing more than faces. We’re supposed to care about them, but hardly anyone other than Jaiyah gets a backstory or even a personality. Even Waititi’s camera stays so fixated on Jaiyah that the rest of the team feel like tag-alongs.

Image Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures

But not only do the majority of the relationships get shortchanged, so does the entire sports angle itself. Nothing about it comes across as authentic mainly because Waititi doesn’t put the time or effort into making it believable. We never see any kind of practice or preparation that would make us believe the American Samoan team could ever function in a qualifying match much less score a goal. That’s because Waititi’s interests are elsewhere.

That would be fine except Waititi wants us to buy into the film’s big feel-good finish – a lazy, super cheesy, emotionally inert retread of ground covered by countless other sports movies. We get the big game, the lovable underdogs, the mean and overly cocky opposing team, the moment where all seems lost, the big inspirational speech, and the rousing triumph where the music swells as everyone goes wild. It’s a surprisingly unoriginal and frustratingly hollow ending from a filmmaker trying to skate by on just representation and a few good gags. Or maybe he doesn’t expect much from his audience. Either way, Waititi’s latest misses the net by a mile. “Next Goal Wins” hits theaters November 17th.

VERDICT – 2 STARS

Movie Poster Spotlight: David Fincher’s “The Killer”

David Fincher’s “The Killer” premieres TODAY on Netflix and it should immediately be put near the top of your queue. Michael Fassbender gives a lights-out turn as a cold, calculated, and extremely efficient hitman who finds himself breaking his own rules to pay back those who have turned against him. Not only is the smart and stylish action-thriller one of 2023’s best movies, it also features what might be my favorite movie posters to release this year.

So make plans to watch “The Killer” this weekend (you can read my full review HERE). In the meantime, check out the three stunning posters designed by Neil Kellerhouse and illustrated by James Patterson.

REVIEW: “The Marvels” (2023)

I think by now even the most hardcore fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe would have to admit that the once dominating phenomenon has lost some steam. For many people MCU movies once felt like events and audiences couldn’t wait for the next chapter to hit the big screen. But over-saturation, bad choices, and even worse ambitions has led to an uninteresting, unfocused, and overstuffed mess that hasn’t felt on track since “Avengers: Endgame”.

But that hasn’t stopped Disney’s Marvel machine. Yet another shining example of the MCU’s current state is “The Marvels”, a $275 million cosmic girl-power adventure directed by relative newcomer Nia DaCosta. This is only DaCosta’s third feature with her most prominent prior work being 2021’s underwhelming “Candyman” sequel. Obviously there’s risk in investing that much money in inexperience and we should know this weekend if their gamble paid off. But money talk aside, it’s the movie that we should be looking at and sadly it’s not very good.

The trailers for “The Marvels” weren’t that encouraging and watching a slew of lackluster Disney+ streaming shows just to keep up has long lost its appeal. Yet that’s what the movie demands and even then I’m not sure that what we get makes much sense. And that’s just one of several nagging frustrations that make “The Marvels” as bland, clunky and uneven as most of the other post-Endgame material that has came and went before it.

Image Courtesy of Marvel Studios

Written by DaCosta, Megan McDonnell, and Elissa Karasik, “The Marvels” is a scattershot mess of a movie. It’s hampered by a jumbled narrative, uninspired CGI, and yet another wafer-thin villain. The movie is tonally schizophrenic and is constantly straining for laughs or applause. But worst of all, it does nothing to build excitement for the current state of the MCU nor does it build much anticipation for things to come (despite a pretty cool mid-credits scene that’s meant to do just that).

“The Marvels” leans heaviest on the so-so chemistry of its three central characters, Carol Danvers aka Captain Marvel (Brie Larson), Monica Rambeau (Teyonah Parris), and Kamala Khan (Iman Vellani). Together the three have a handful of good moments and the actresses certainly give it their all. But because of the numbingly bad writing, they aren’t the most compelling trio. Carol has been established as a powerful MCU superhero. But here she spends much of the time bemused and even aimless. There’s not much to say about Monica as most of her MCU development has happened offscreen. And call me a bad guy, but a little of the starry-eyed Kamala Kahn goes a long way.

As for the story, there’s not much to latch onto. Basically Carol, Monica, and Kamala are brought together after their exposure to a potent energy causes them to switch places whenever they use their powers (or at least sometimes when they use their powers). Meanwhile the film’s horribly underwritten villain, Dar-Benn (Zawe Ashton) Is running around ripping holes in space and stealing resources from planets that Carol holds dear. We learn there’s some bad blood between them and Dar-Benn (of course) wants revenge.

Image Courtesy of Marvel Studios

About the closest we get to a human heartbeat involves some sad history between Carol and Monica. But it’s barely an emotional blip in a movie that is essentially a handful of action scenes stitched together by bad characterizations, poor attempts at comedy (most from Samuel L. Jackson’s returning but wasted Nick Fury), and dull exposition full of cosmic mumbo-jumbo about quantum bands, a “Universal Weapon”, ruptures in space-time, etc. etc. etc. Oh, and there’s a weird planet where people only speak in song – a true low point in the movie and for what passes as creativity within the current MCU.

Not to pile on, but there also several baffling oversights such as head-scratching time lapses, Kamala’s vanishing outfit (I’ll let you discover that one), and perhaps craziest of all, the unintentionally hilarious ending that basically renders everything before it unnecessary. It leaves you wondering how such a big-budget project was allowed to release in such a state.

The movie wastes no time trying to divert our attention away from “The Marvels” and point us forward with an eye-rolling final scene that may excite die-hards and a mid-credits scene that teases some potentially cool things IF you still have faith that Kevin Feige and the MCU can deliver. Admittedly my faith had already waned and “The Marvels” only reassured my disillusion. But for others, if you can set your expectations low enough you might find some disposable entertainment in “The Marvels”. But that in itself is sad. Especially for those of us who once anxiously counted the days to every new MCU release. Those days seem so long ago. “The Marvels” open in theaters today.

VERDICT – 1.5 STARS

New on Home Video: “The Nun II” on 4K Ultra HD + Digital

“The Nun II”, the latest supernatural horror installment in the The Conjuring universe, is coming to home video courtesy of Warner Brothers Home Entertainment. This sequel to 2018’s “The Nun” continues the story of Sister Irene (played by a returning Taissa Farmiga) who once again comes face-to-face with the terrifying demon nun named Valak (Bonnie Aarons). Though light on special features, the movie is presented in high quality 4K UHD and includes a digital copy of the film. It’s a nice addition to any horror fan’s collection. Read my full review of “The Nun II” HERE.

This 4K UHD plus Digital Copy edition of “The Nun II” releases November 14th. See below for a full synopsis and release information.

About the Film:

Year: 2023

Runtime: 110 Minutes

Director: Michael Chaves

Screenwriter: Ian Golding, Richard Naing and Akela Cooper

Story By: Akela Cooper

Cast: Taissa Farmiga, Jonas Bloquet, Bonnie Aarons, Storm Reid, and Anna Popplewell

Rating: R for Action/Violence, Some Bloody Images, Language and Brief Suggestive Material

Synopsis:

1956 – France. A priest is murdered. An evil is spreading. The sequel to the worldwide smash hit follows Sister Irene as she once again comes face-to-face with Valak, the demon nun.

Taissa Farmiga (“The Nun,” “The Gilded Age”) returns as Sister Irene, joined by Jonas Bloquet (“Tirailleurs,” “The Nun”), Storm Reid (“The Last of Us,” “The Suicide Squad”), Anna Popplewell (“Fairytale,” “The Chronicles of Narnia” trilogy) and Bonnie Aarons (reprising her role from “The Nun”), surrounded by an ensemble cast of international talent.

Michael Chaves (“The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It”) directs, from a screenplay by Ian Goldberg & Richard Naing (“Eli,” “The Autopsy of Jane Doe”) and Akela Cooper (“M3GAN,” “Malignant”), with a story by Cooper, based on characters created by James Wan & Gary Dauberman.

Special Features:

4K UHD, Blu-ray, and Digital copies contain the following special features:

  • Demons in Paradise – featurette (5:35)
  • Handcrafter Nightmares – featurette (7:28)

REVIEW: “Hands that Bind” (2023)

A hard-working but struggling hired hand has his hopes of taking over his employer’s farm dashed when his boss’s wayward son returns, staking a claim on his inheritance. That’s the gist of “Hands that Bind”, a minimalist slow-burning rural drama written, directed, and produced by Kyle Armstrong. It’s a movie with a quiet and low-key exterior but with a simmering bone-deep dark side that becomes more evident as its story unfolds.

Set in 1981 on the stark remote prairies of Alberta, Canada, “Hands that Bind” follows a dedicated farmhand named Andy Hollace (played with remarkable restraint by Paul Sparks). He works hard tending to things for his boss Mac (Nicholas Campbell). In addition to a paycheck, Mac lets Andy, his wife Susan (Susan Kent), and their two young kids live in an extra guesthouse on his property. It’s far from lavish living, but it enables Andy to provide for his family.

Image Courtesy of Dark Sky Films

But things take a turn after Mac learns that his son Dirk (Landon Liboiron) is coming home after losing his job in the oil fields. He informs Andy that he can stay on for another month, but then he’ll have to let him go. Even worse, Dirk along with his wife and newborn, will be needing the guesthouse. So Andy and his family are forced to move into a beat up old trailer home until he can find somewhere else to go.

It’s a gut-punch for Andy who had his eyes set on one day taking over Mac’s place. But Dirk’s unceremonious reappearance and apparent claim to his birthright changes everything. It doesn’t help that he’s lazy, hot-tempered, and knows nothing when it comes to farming. Andy immediately takes a disliking to him and understandably so. The tension between them is obvious to us. But Andy keeps his growing animus hidden and at bay, at least until he can’t anymore.

While that’s the main story in a nutshell, Armstrong throws in several unexpected curveballs that steers “Hands that Bind” (and more specifically Andy himself) in some uneasy directions. First there is the handful of wicked dream sequences that grow more and more twisted as the story progresses. Then you have cows turning up dead, mutilated with pinpoint precision. And strange lights in the distance sky – aliens? That all may sound strangely out of place and even far-fetched. But Armstrong has more on his mind and is going for something much different than how it may sound.

Image Courtesy of Dark Sky Films

Strong compelling leads are essential in character-driven dramas like this and Paul Sparks delivers. He gives a richly organic and understated performance that is perfectly in step with what his character needs. His Andy is tough to read. He’s grounded yet enigmatic – a mysterious blank canvas in many ways. One that slowly comes more into focus as things tighten around him. Kent brings much-needed heart and pathos while Liboiron is adequately detestable. We even get the great Bruce Dern as Mac’s sad crusty neighbor, Hank.

I can see the last 15 minutes being pretty divisive as Armstrong doesn’t offer much in terms of answers. Its ambiguous finish and loose ends will likely be seen as artfully challenging by some and frustratingly unfinished by others. But Armstrong isn’t interested in spelling things out. There’s so much more going on underneath the slow-cooking narrative and beyond the spellbinding cinematography (DP Mike McLaughlin should be on every Oscar shortlist). And it’s those unexpected creative strokes that ultimately give the movie its kick. “Hands that Bind” is out now in select theaters and on VOD.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

REVIEW: “The Marsh King’s Daughter” (2023)

Daisy Ridley gets a meaty non-Star Wars role in “The Marsh King’s Daughter”, the new film from director Neil Burger. His latest is based on the 2017 novel of the same name by Karen Dionne that tells the story of a young woman haunted by unthinkable events from her childhood. It’s a good character for Ridley who gets some solid material to work with. At least until the last act which is where the story slips off track and squanders some otherwise exciting potential.

The movie begins with a beguiling prologue set in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. There, deep in the wilderness near a long winding marsh, a 10-year-old girl named Helena (played by Brooklynn Prince) lives off the grid with her quietly reserved mother Beth (Caren Pistorius) and her backwoodsman father Jacob (Ben Mendelsohn). Helena is a daddy’s girl and is constantly by his side as he teaches her how to live off the land. But her understanding of a normal life is shattered by the discovery that her dad is a psychopath (something you might have guessed by just by seeing Mendelsohn’s named attached).

Image Courtesy of Lionsgate

We learn that Jacob abducted Beth twelve years earlier and has held her captive since. The two had Helena who Beth has tried to protect. I won’t spoil how it plays out, but Beth manages to escape with a confused Helena and a pursuing Jacob is arrested. Altogether it’s a well-shot, well-written, and well-executed opening that sets the movie on an intriguing trajectory.

From there the story (penned by Elle and Mark L. Smith) jumps ahead twenty years. Helena (now played by Ridley) is married to the well-meaning but in-the-dark Stephen (Garrett Hedlund) and she has a daughter of her own named Marigold (Joey Carson). She’s kept her true identity hidden from everyone except her step-father Sheriff Clark (Gil Birmingham). But when Jacob (since dubbed “The Marsh King”) manages to escape during a prisoner transfer, her deep dark secret is forced into the light.

Image Courtesy of Lionsgate

From there the movie had the opportunity to go in several different directions. It could have dug into the relationship with her now estranged mother. It could have went deeper into the effects of attempting to bury such intense trauma especially on her marriage. It could have added depth to her thinly sketched relationship with her father-in-law. It could have defied expectations and done something more psychological and suspenseful.

But rather than keeping us guessing or catching us by surprise, the movie goes the more conventional route, leading to an ending that’s as far-fetched as it is predictable. It ends up being a letdown considering the many more interesting avenues it could have traveled. Meanwhile a really good Daisy Ridley performance gets lost in a movie that may have a hard time finding an audience. Why? Because “The Marsh King’s Daughter” doesn’t stand out. It could have, but the unfortunate decision to play it safe holds it back. “The Marsh King’s Daughter” is in theaters now.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS