REVIEW: “Orphan” (2009)

For some reason the 2009 psychological horror film “Orphan” slipped completely by me. Not only did I not see it during its original release, I don’t remember even hearing about it. In fact, it wasn’t until the announcement of its recently released prequel and its subsequent good word of mouth that I was actually aware of its existence. That’s crazy for me considering that “Orphan” wasn’t some obscure, minuscule budgeted, straight-to-video release. Even more baffling, it stars two acting talents I really enjoy – Vera Farmiga and Peter Sarsgaard.

To prep for its prequel, I finally sat down with “Orphan”. It’s directed by Jaume Collet-Serra (“Jungle Cruise”, “Black Adam”), written by David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick (“Aquaman”, “The Conjuring 2”), and co-produced by Leonardo DiCaprio (???). As mentioned, the film stars Farmiga and Sarsgaard playing a struggling couple who adopt a young girl to help cope with the loss of their own child. Needless to say, things don’t quite turn out as they had hoped.

Image Courtesy of Paramount

Kate and John Coleman’s marriage is at a critical point following the stillborn loss of their third child, Jessica. Kate (Farmiga), a recovering alcoholic, is finding it harder to resist her urges to drink. And the couple can’t seem to rekindle the intimacy they once had before losing their baby. After much consideration, Kate and John (Sarsgaard) visit St. Mariana’s Home for Girls and adopt 9-year-old Esther (Isabelle Fuhrman).

Esther is exceptionally bright, well-mannered, and artistic. But she’s not without her eccentricities. For example, she dresses as if she’s been yanked from another time period. And what’s with that old Bible she keeps hidden in her sock drawer? She immediately hits it off with the Coleman’s 5-year-old hearing impaired daughter, Max (Aryana Engineer). But their jealous 12-year-old son Daniel (Jimmy Bennett) immediately dislikes the new family addition, and the tension between the two only intensifies.

“Orphan” is one of those movies where the audience knows the angle from the start. We know something is off with Esther and that nothing good is going to come for this family. So it’s all about watching it play out and waiting for the truth about Esther to be revealed. In some films like this, that can be maddening. But kudos to Collet-Serra and Johnson-McGoldrick for creating characters we can connect with and care about. From there the task is to create atmosphere and build tension, something Collet-Serra does very well.

Image Courtesy of Paramount

The film is really helped by strong performances from Farmiga, Sarsgaard, and Fuhrman. Farmiga gets the meatiest and most complex role while Sarsgaard is a sturdy scene-sharer. Both find layers of humanity in their characters especially as their family dynamic starts to crumble. In the meantime, Fuhrman is a steadily unnerving presence, and she only gets creepier as Esther’s malevolence grows. It’s a wickedly effective performance.

So it took me a while, but I finally got around to seeing “The Orphan”. I’m glad I did. It’s a fun, preposterous, and at times chilling horror thriller that’s more interested in the psychological than cheap scares or gore galore. Other than a prequel, it’s hard to see what more they could do with it as this works really well as a stand-alone movie. There’s some quality character work, some really good tension-building, and a pretty gnarly final act that should please the genre faithful. “Orphan” is now streaming on Paramount+.

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Beast” (2022 – US)

It’s been quite the busy year for Idris Elba. Back in April he voiced a key character in “Sonic the Hedgehog 2”. He co-stars in George Miller’s fever-dream fantasy “Three Thousand Years of Longing” which is set to open next week. And later this year he has “Luther” coming out, a feature film continuation of his popular BBC television series.

And then there’s “Beast”, a survival thriller with plenty of B-movie flavor that sees Elba protecting his two daughters from a ferocious man-eating lion. In many ways it’s a throwback to the many man-versus-beast movies that would pop up on the shelves of my favorite video rental store back in 1980s. But our fascination with these types of movies existed well before that. And while maybe not as prevalent today (with the exception of the endless parade of shark movies), this ‘genre’ has never really gone away. Birds, piranha, alligators, wolves, a Kodiak bear, a wild boar, a rabid St. Bernard, even snakes on a plane – mankind has often found itself at odds (often by their own doing) with our planet’s wildlife.

Image Courtesy of Universal Pictures

“Beast” sees Elba teaming with Icelandic director Baltasar Kormákur. They’re working from a screenplay by Ryan Engle which is based on a story by Jaime Primak Sullivan. Speaking of the story, it’s light in terms of depth and pretty basic when it comes to plot development. But that’s okay for a movie as straightforward as “Beast”. All it needs to do is set the stage, give us characters we care about, and then keep us firmly planted on the edges of our seats. Kormákur hits every one of those marks.

“Beast” is a feral, rip-roaring nail-biter (bad puns absolutely intended) that’s all about giving its audience a taut, immersive experience. There is a touching family dynamic that’s built upon themes of loss, resentment, guilt, and reconciliation. But let’s be honest, most people who go see “Beast” are there to watch Idris Elba go one-on-one with a rabid CGI lion.

Elba plays recently widowed Dr. Nate Samuels who’s taking his two daughters, Mere (Iyana Halley) and Norah (Leah Sava Jeffries), on a trip to South Africa to the place where he and their late mom first met. This is an important trip for this struggling family who are not only burdened by grief but also old wounds from their family’s past (which are brought to light within the first act). The three are well written and they possess a good family chemistry, dysfunction and all. Their relationships feel organic in large part thanks to the performances. The sturdy and reliable Elba is as good as always, but so are the two young actresses, Halley and Jeffries.

When they arrive they’re met by Martin (Sharlto Copley), a close family friend who works at a wildlife reserve protecting animals from poachers. After settling in and getting some rest, Martin takes Nate and the two girls on a safari to the far ends of the reserve. But when they stop to visit a local village they make a grisly discovery. Everyone is dead – savagely ripped to shreds by what looks like a lion attack. Realizing how out of the ordinary it is for a lion to attack in such a way and fearing the predator is nearby, Martin gets Nate and the girls back to their truck. But they don’t get far before running headfirst into the bloodthirsty man-eater.

And that pretty much sets up the tension for the entire film. Marooned, with no communication, and with an angry lion on the prowl, Nate must protect his girls and find a way to get them to safety. Along the way there are some unexpected encounters highlighted by several vicious and gnarly attack scenes. And as usual for movies like this, the characters give us a few of those head-scratching moments that have you internally yelling “Close the door!” or “Don’t go out there!”.

Image Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Narratively, there is an effort by the story to give purpose to the lion’s attacks which makes it more than just ‘a killer lion killing people’ tale. Visually, the movie looks pretty great, from arid sun-parched surroundings to the digitally animated cats. Kormákur and Oscar-winning DP Philippe Rousselot shoot the film with a visceral style that features numerous long takes and tight tracking shots. It gives certain scenes bite (sorry, I couldn’t resist) and adds to the suspense.

Clocking in at a lean 90 minutes, “Beast” doesn’t outstay its welcome, wrapping up pretty predictably but in a satisfying way. Overall, it’s a movie with a simple premise that’s executed very well technically and narratively. Just know what you’re going in for and don’t expect a ton more than that. Kormákur certainly understands what kind of movie he’s making, And he delivers just the kind of fun B-movie entertainment I was hoping for. “Beast” opens today in theaters.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

First Glance: “The Greatest Beer Run Ever”

With a name as goofy as this one, it’s tempting to think you have a good sense for what this movie is going for. I know I did. But then I watched the trailer for “The Greatest Beer Run Ever”. It turns out to be a far cry from what I expected. This biographical action-comedy from director and co-writer Peter Farrelly looks quite good and it sports a terrific cast that includes Zac Efron, Russell Crowe, and Bill Murray.

Based on genuinely wild and crazy real events, “Beer Run” tells the true story of John “Chickie” Donohue (Efron). In 1967, Chickie would sneak into war-torn Vietnam on a dare and began taking cans of beer to U.S. soldiers, even those on the battlefield. His idea was to let them know that there are people back home who support them. The trailer is a hearty mix of comedy, wartime action, and feel-good drama. Now hopefully the movie ends up as good as the trailer teases.

“The Greatest Beer Run Ever” hits select theaters and AppleTV+ on September 30th. Check out the trailer below and let me know if you’ll be seeing it or taking a pass.

REVIEW: “Sonic the Hedgehog 2” (2022)

“Sonic the Hedgehog” surprised a lot of people in 2020 in terms of both quality and box office numbers. Based on the classic SEGA video game platformer, the movie had its flaws. But overall it was a fun and often funny family feature that earned nearly $320 million. A sequel was all but guaranteed and we got it earlier this year. As of today, “Sonic the Hedgehog 2” has earned just over $400 million and now it’s available to stream on Paramount+.

Back is director Jeff Fowler along with screenwriters Pat Casey and Josh Miller (they’re joined this time by John Whittington). Also returning is Ben Schwartz voicing the blue anthropomorphic hedgehog with lightning speed, James Marsden as small-town sheriff and Sonic’s adoptive father Tom Wachowski, and Jim Carrey, reprising his role as mad scientist Dr. Robotnik. The sequel includes a few more familiar faces (and voices) and a couple of new ones as well.

Despite mostly enjoying the first film, I wasn’t in a hurry to see “Sonic 2” (as evident by this late review). Call it lukewarm expectations. But to my surprise, the sequel turned out to be an entertaining romp and better than the first film in several areas. It doesn’t quite utilize its biggest strength (Carrey) the same way its predecessor did, but it has a few cool additions that brings new energy to the series.

Image Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

The movie opens with the delightfully maniacal Dr. Robotnik marooned on The Mushroom planet (see the first movie or check out its Wiki) and plotting his revenge against Sonic. Of course first he’ll need to find a way off the world. He uses what tech he can salvage from his crashed hovercraft and the energy from one of Sonic’s quills (again, see the previous film) and sends out an intergalactic pulse. It attracts the attention of Knuckles (voiced by none other than Idris Elba), a red echidna warrior endowed with super strength. He turns out to be Robotnik‘s ticket off the planet.

Meanwhile on earth, Sonic is overanxious to put his powers to use, even not-so-secretly posing as a superhero he calls Blue Justice. But his guardian Tom pleads with him to be patient telling him that his time to be a hero will come. As it turns out Sonic doesn’t have to wait long.

While Tom and his wife Maddie (Tika Sumpter) are attending a wedding in Hawaii, Robotnik and Knuckles arrive on earth. The honor-bound Knuckles, the last of his tribe, is after a powerful relic called the Master Emerald which grants its possessor the ability to turn thought into reality (Think of it as the “Sonic” franchise’s Infinity Gauntlet). Knuckles wants to honor his extinct tribe’s role as the relic’s protectors. Of course the diabolical Robotnik has far more sinister intentions. But watching from a distance is a flying two-tailed fox appropriately named Tails (voiced by Colleen O’Shaughnessey) who has arrived on earth to warn Sonic of the looming threat.

Much like the first film, “Sonic 2” is as much a lighthearted comedy as it is a frolicsome action-adventure. It has plenty of funny bits, the best coming from Carrey who owns every goofy scene he’s in. But we also get some good laughs from Natasha Rothwell playing Maddie’s sister who hates Tom, and Lee Majdoub who plays Robotnik’s loyal servant Stone. They’re just some of the characters who fill out the story, most of whom are entertaining and fit well within the world.

Image Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

But what I like most (and what separates it from so many of today’s animated features) is that the action never reaches an assaultive fever pitch. There’s plenty of it, but Fowler doesn’t go for the sensory overload. There some really good digital effects work and the blend of live-action and animation is practically seamless. And while I won’t spoil the climactic battle, I love how it took inspiration from certain Japanese Toho films.

Speaking of inspiration, “Sonic 2” features countless other nods to movies and pop culture. “Cast Away”, the “Indiana Jones” films, “Army of Darkness”, and “Poltergeist” just to name a few. There’s even a gag referencing the Vin Diesel and Dwayne Johnson feud. Toss in some good themes of friendship, responsibility, forgiveness, and family and you have a movie that will resonate in several ways with kids and adults.

Now I don’t want to oversell it. There are some lazy gags (will we ever get away from the fart jokes?) and certain segments of the story don’t really feel necessary. And the two-hour runtime may wear some viewers out. But I can’t lie, “Sonic the Hedgehog 2” surprised me. I had fun with the characters, was impressed by the visuals, and enjoyed all the winks to other movies and genres. And perhaps most surprising – I’d be up for a third film. Just one request – more Jim Carrey please. “Sonic the Hedgehog 2” is available on VOD and is streaming on Paramount+.

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Baby Assassins” (2022)

How’s that for an attention-getting title? “Baby Assassins” sounds wacky, and to be honest it kinda is. But it’s the seeded eccentricities that makes this gleefully violent and proudly silly Japanese action-comedy click. Much like its title, the very premise of the film borders on absurdity. But this is a very self-aware movie and there’s never a sense it’s taking itself too seriously. In fact, there’s a lightheartedness ingrained both in the story and the storytelling that would normally clash with a tale about two deadly contract killers.

But hats off to writer and director Yugo Sakamoto who makes this teen Odd Couple genre mashup far more entertaining than it might sound. There are several pieces that factor into the film’s success: the two fabulous lead performances and their perky chemistry, the wily script, the genuinely funny laughs, and the bursts of exciting (and sometimes brutal) action. It all gels in this breezy off-beat jaunt that plays much differently than the bulk of hitman/assassin movies we get these days.

Image Courtesy of Well Go USA Entertainment

Chisato (Akari Takaishi) and Mahiro (Saori Izawa) are high-schoolers who are all prepped to graduate. They’re also employed and they happen to be really good at their “main job”. As the title gives away, the two are highly trained assassins who work for a tightly managed secret outfit ran by a mystery man named Mr. Tasaka. As part of company policy, once out of school the two are required to move in together and get part-time jobs. It’s all to provide cover for their true vocation.

And this is where the humor really kicks in. Neither Chisato or Mahiro are good at keeping jobs, and much of the fun is watching them try and fail miserably to fit into the everyday work force. It’s not for lack of effort. They are just awkwardly out of their element and easily frustrated. It leads to several fun scenes featuring botched interviews, some rather violent daydreaming on the job, and some amusing clashes with bosses.

Then there is their relationship. Your enjoyment of “Baby Assassins” may hinge on how much you like hanging out with the two lead characters considering their quirky friendship is the centerpiece of the film. A few hiccups aside, when it comes to killing, Chisato and Mahiro work together like a (fairly) well-oiled machine. But when it comes to personality, they couldn’t be more different. Chisato is the jaunty gregarious type who loves talking almost as much as her machine gun. Mahiro is detached and socially awkward; a soft-spoken sociopath who would rather mutter to herself that speak to anyone else. Polar opposites but a sparkling pair in large part thanks to the effortlessly organic chemistry between Takaishi and Izawa.

Image Courtesy of Well Go USA Entertainment

And of course there’s the action which isn’t as plentiful as you might think, but it comes in furious (and exhilarating) bursts. They’re wonderfully arranged by veteran fight choreographer Kensuke Sonomura and culminate in a rousing climax after the girls get sideways with a Yakuza boss (Yasukaze Motomiya) and his two psychotic kids (Akitani Mone and Satoshi Uekiya). While both leads are incredibly proficient in the action scenes, it’s Izawa whose stuntwoman background comes out in a jaw-dropping and brilliantly shot one-on-one fight sequence near the end.

So as you can tell, “Baby Assassins” has plenty of pieces that could easily be at odds with each other. But Sakamoto’s savvy direction and whip-smart script pulls everything together in a way that obliterated my expectations. While it may be a bit rough around the edges and its budget restraints occasionally show, the movie is still bursting with personality and energy. Those who are more action-minded may be taken back by the playful tone and casual pacing. But fear not, the final 15 minutes doles out just the kind of satisfying action-fueled payoff we’ve been anticipating.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

REVIEW: “Mack & Rita” (2022)

(CLICK HERE for my full review in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette)

Diane Keaton has had a wonderful 52-year career and she has shown no sign of slowing down. Granted, the movies from this current stage of her career haven’t been great. But I love that she’s still working and doing what she enjoys. And that brings us to her new film in theaters this weekend, “Mack & Rita”. I would love to talk about how the movie serves as a fresh reminder of Keaton’s terrific comedic chops. But unfortunately I can’t because “Mack & Rita” turns out to be a well-intentioned but surprisingly bland and flavorless comedy. And while it’s nice to see Keaton on screen, this won’t be listed among the movies she’ll be remembered for.

Directed by Katie Aselton and co-written by Madeline Walter and Paul Welsh, “Mack & Rita” never feels like its own thing. Instead it comes across as a collection of ideas plucked from other movies that are snapped together and given a title. There’s really nothing original about the story and there’s not a single surprise. In fact, you’ll have the entire plot mapped out within the first 15 minutes. It’s a shame because the movie sports a talented cast. But without good material, they’re left out to dry.

Image Courtesy of Gravitas Ventures

Following the lead of other ‘stuck-in-the-wrong-body’ movies like “13 Going on 30” and “Big”, this story centers on 30-year-old Mack (Elizabeth Lail), an Instagram influencer and aspiring writer. Mack was raised by her beloved grandmother who was always outgoing and very comfortable in her own wonderfully eccentric skin. Max wanted to be just like her, but as she got older she suppressed her own individuality in order to fit in. You could say it worked. She got invited to all the parties and made some popular new friends. But she did it without being true to her “inner old lady”.

Professionally, Mack feels stuck in neutral. She’s published her first novel and is excited to start writing again. But rather than helping her secure an advance for a new book, all she gets from her not-so-encouraging agent (Patti Harrison) are menial jobs taking photos at publicity events and posting them on social media. Socially, she would rather spend her time home alone with her dog, working on her book and dodging her overly chatty and clearly smitten neighbor Jack (Dustin Milligan). But even now she’s still living up to the expectations of others.

While on a bachelorette getaway in Palm Springs for her bride-to-be best friend Carla (Taylour Paige), Mack happens upon the tent of a self-proclaimed spiritual guru named Luca (Simon Rex) who specializes in past-life regression therapy. He places her in a contraption called a regression pod (which is nothing more than a glorified tanning bed) and begins their session. Once the pod sputters to a stop, Luca is gone and Mack steps out in the body of her 70-year-old self (played by Keaton). High-jinks and self-discovery ensues.

From there the story veers into more conventional territory. We get the expected shock and panic as Mack tries to grasp her wacky new circumstances. But when she begins posing as her own fictitious Aunt Rita, Mack discovers the carefree spirit her grandmother embodied. Her new zest for life takes her from hanging out with Carla’s mom (Loretta Devine) and the ladies from her women’s wine club to becoming a social media sensation known as the “Glammy Granny” (yep, you read that right).

Now before coming down too hard on “Mack & Rita”, it should be said it’s a very self-aware movie. It’s knowingly silly and unapologetically lighthearted. There’s nothing wrong with that. Also, it has a handful of good moments, particularly in the few times where it slows down and lets its characters breathe. And who can argue with its message of accepting yourself and staying true to who you are?

Image Courtesy of Gravitas Ventures

But that doesn’t make the unfunny and uninspired stuff go away. When it comes to the comedy and the storytelling, the movie is loaded with misfires. There’s the cringe-worthy slapstick, one awkwardly bad drug trip scene, and several scenarios that are too absurd to swallow. You also have a weirdly out-of-tune romantic angle with Rita and Jack. And then there’s the finish which spells out the themes in detail just in case you missed them.

Combine all of that with the already mentioned predictability and complete lack of originality, and we’re left with a movie that really does nothing for anyone involved. Especially for someone with the cinematic stature of Diane Keaton. “Mack & Rita” is out now in theaters.

VERDICT – 2 STARS