For the past few years Hollywood has been consumed with remaking movies from the 1980’s. I have to admit, “Conan the Barbarian” was one of those movies that I could see being remade into a really satisfying film. I was a big fan of the original 1982 fantasy film starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. It was a gritty and violent movie filled with swordplay and sorcery. This time Jason Momoa of TV’s “Stargate Atlantis” and “Game of Thrones” takes on the role of Conan and while he does a good job channeling the Barbarian’s grunts, grumbles, and muscle flexes, ultimately the movie’s story runs out of gas and the special effects don’t live up to what you would expect from a 2011 movie.

We are introduced to Conan by seeing his birth on the battlefield during an intense attack. His mother dies and he is raised by his father Corin (Ron Perlman), the leader of a tribe of barbarians. Conan grows into a young boy who’s agile and has skills with the sword beyond his age. It’s during this time that his village is attacked by the forces of an evil warlord Khalar Zym (Stephen Lang) who is seeking the pieces to an ancient mask that he believes will resurrect his deceased wife and eventually lead to his rule over Hyboria. Doesn’t it always come down to that in one way or another?

Zym and his army destroy young Conan’s village and leave him to watch his father’s death. The story then catapults ahead to an adult Conan working as a mercenary. He still wants revenge for the death of his father and soon finds a trail that he hopes will lead to Zym. Zym is seeking to activate the ancient mask which takes him to a monastery that houses a pure-blood descendent (Rachel Nichols) who is the key to the mask’s power. Conan ventures from location to location before tracking Zym down and he soon finds himself in the middle of this weird tangled mess. He also must face the conflict between a true romantic affection for the descendent and the sworn revenge on the warlord who killed his father.

The story has promise especially for those who love these types of films and it would be unfair to completely dismiss it. The movie has moments that does capture what made the original film a cult favorite particularly during the first half. But at the halfway mark the movie begins to lose steam and it becomes more of a conventional fantasy tale that doesn’t offer anything fresh. There are plenty of action scenes that offer lots of snarls, sword twirling, and blood splatters. Some of them are well conceived and I remember letting out a few exclamations during a couple of particularly good sequences. But to be honest, a lot of the action lacked context and seemed to just be pop up at random. I also found the finale to be as underwhelming as is the buildup to it. Since the movie was already struggling narratively, it really hurts that the action falls a little short.

I was also a bit surprised at how unimpressive the special effects turned out to be. There are several scenes where we get shots of a new location from a distance but each of these places look like a hazy painting with the exception of smoke from the chimneys or a bird flying by. There is also a creature battle close to the end that certainly won’t blow you away especially considering the visual accomplishments of today’s effects. But there is a really good effects-driven sequence where Conan is battling a group of sand warriors conjured up by Zym’s witch daughter Marique (Rose McGowan). As far as the action goes, this was clearly the best the movie offers.

As I mentioned, Momoa is a soild Conan and Nichols is a good match for him on the screen. Perlman is a nice choice for Conan’s father even though its s smaller role. Stephen Lang isn’t as horrible as he was in “Avatar” but he still seems to be following the “How to Play a Movie Villain” handbook. He overplays several scenes and he’s never that menacing. McGowan, his co-antagonist, feels like a bigger threat even though her character is pretty shallow and forgettable.

Forgettable is also a good way to describe “Conan the Barbarian”. It’s far from being a terrible movie but it squanders a lot of potential. It does do a few things right especially in the first half of the film. There are also moments that made me think back to the original film and how I responded to these types of movies when I was a kid. Unfortunately the film can’t offer a compelling story from start to finish and the visuals just don’t feel like a strong enough upgrade to make this feel special. It’s really unfortunate. This was one remake that I expected a lot more from.


I thought it might be fun to do a Phenomenal 5 that should surely spark discussion. I’m going to list five movies that I feel are incredibly overrated. Now I know there are many people who love the movies I’m listing and they have been defended as greatĀ films by many who are smarter than me. But for different reasons I didn’t find them to be the cinematic classics that they are heralded as.Ā Some aren’t necessarily terrible movies.Ā But none of these filmsĀ worked for me. I actually found there to be more movies to consider than I thought there would be but I’m very comfortable with these five. As always I wouldn’t call this the definitive list. But for me, there’s no denying that these are 5 phenomenally overrated films…or are they?

#5 – “TOY STORY 3” (2010)

I can’t think of another movie review that I have written that stirred more people up than my take on “Toy Story 3”. The movie was incredibly popular and it was a gold mine for Pixar. It not only won the Best Animated Feature Oscar but it was also nominated for Best Picture. What surprised me even more is that the film found it’s way on countless Critic’s Top 10 lists for the year 2010. My biggest beef with “Toy Story 3” is that it’s pretty run-of-the-mill. The filmĀ is bookendedĀ by an outstanding opening and a touching ending but it’s everything in between that stumbles. It’s a repetitive drag that’s really nothing more than a typical loud cartoon. The middle has some serious issues with tone and it could have easily been 15 minutes shorter. Now “Toy Story 3” isn’t a bad movie but it’s also not one that I feel deserved the accolades it received. It has it’s share of flaws and I certainly feel it’s overrated.

#4 – “ANNIE HALL” (1977)

I have heard “Annie Hall” called the greatest romantic comedy of all time. I can’t say I agree. This much-loved film won several Academy Awards including Best Original Screenplay and Best Picture for Woody Allen. It’s also heralded as the 35th Greatest Movie of All Time by the American Film Institute (taken for what it’s worth). Now don’t misunderstand me, I did find “Annie Hall” to be funny in places. But I also found it to be repetitive andĀ eventually a tad boring.Ā It sometimes comes across as a standup comedy routine that uses the same material but presents it in slightly different ways. I can appreciate Allen’s wit but here heĀ milks that cow dry. “Annie Hall” certainly isn’t terrible but I have a hard time calling it one of the best of all time. In fact, for me it’s not even close.

#3 – “EASY RIDER” (1969)

“Easy Rider” is considered a landmark counterculture movie and it ushered in a new style and method of filmmaking. It receivedĀ several Oscar nominations and even today it’s listed as The American Film Institute’s 84th greatest movie of all time. Well, I have to disagree. Not only did I find “Easy Rider” flat and muddled but also annoying at times. It’s the hippie movement’s self-portrait that features more pot smoking and free spirit babbling than entertainment and enjoyment. Jack Nicholson is fun to watch and there is some good camera work and locations. But to be honest, I never connected with “Easy Rider”. It feels dated and features one of the most annoying movie scenes I have ever seen (the drug trip in cemetery). I know many love this movie. I’m not one of them.

#2 – “APOCALYPSE NOW” (1979)

I don’t have room to list all of the accolades, honors, and positive reviews that Francis Ford Coppola’s “Apocalypse Now” has received. It was nominated for around 8 Academy Awards winning two. It hauled in three Golden Globe Awards and sits at #28 on AFI’s 100 Greatest Movies list. Almost every prominent film critic has praised the movie. Roger Ebert even goes as far as to call it “one of the greatest of all films”. For me, “Apocalypse Now” is a mixed bag. It’s starts off well enough before really getting good when Robert Duvall hits the screen. The Air Calvary helicopter attack while “Ride of the Valkyries” blares from loud speakers isĀ fantastic and Duvall’s nuttiness is a blast. But the movie flies off the rails with one of the most off-the-wall and numbing endings you’ll find. Look, I understand Coppola isĀ saying a lot under the surface, but at some point I want to be entertained when watching a film. The hallucinogenicĀ jungle cult, severed heads, and philosophical mumblings made “Apocalypse Now” a difficult movie for me to finish. I know that the film broke new ground in terms of filmmaking. It also tries to be too clever for it’s own good.

#1 – “AVATAR” (2009)

James Cameron’s box office juggernaut “Avatar” was an unequivocal critical and commercial success. It was nominated for 9 Academy Awards and at the time became theĀ highest grossing movie of all time. Even fellow filmmakers like Steve Spielberg praised the movie comparing it to “Star Wars”. Through all the hype, I sat stunned at all of the obvious flaws that were overlooked and the passes that the movie was given for it’s shortcomings. To start out let me give it a little credit. Technically, “Avatar” is a stunner. It was the first movie to really show 3D as a powerful cinematic storytelling device. The motion capture technology wasĀ marvelous and the CGI action sequences were unlike anything I had seen before. But for me that’s all “Avatar” offers. First there’s nothing all that original about the story. It’s basically a sci-fi “Dances with Wolves”. It’s completely predictable and you know exactly how things are going to play out in the first 15 minutes. Then there’s the script. It features some of the silliest, cheesiest Ā lines particularly from the poorly portrayed military and the evil corporate head. Stephen Lang is laughably bad as the stereotypical soldier gone bad in what may be the worst performance of the decade. The movie also bludgeon’s the audience to death with Cameron’s forced environmental and political preachiness. He slams the military. He slams big corporations. He force feeds us his concepts of planet worship. And all of it is incredibly heavy-handed. Yes, “Avatar” is a technical milestone but you must haveĀ a good story to match. Instead, “Avatar” has a crappy story covered with a shiny coat of paint. That’s not enough for me.

So there you have them. 5 movies that have received plenty of praise but that I feel are overrated. I’m sure many disagree with my takes on these films. Please leave you comments about these movies or other popular films that you feel are overrated.