REVIEW: “The Strangers – Chapter 3” (2026)

Defining the Strangers movie franchise is no easy task. The original 2008 film, “The Strangers” was truly chilling, and over time it became a cult classic. Its clunker 2018 sequel, “Prey at Night” didn’t fare near as well. But the real confusion came in 2024 with the release of “The Strangers – Chapter 1”, the first film in a new trilogy from director Renny Harlin. “Chapter 2” followed in 2025, and now here we are in early 2026 with “Chapter 3”.

It takes some research to figure out what the trilogy is meant to be. It’s not a prequel trilogy as many of us first thought, but it’s not necessarily a reboot or a rematch either. Instead its creators consider it a “relaunch” and have said that it exists within the same universe as the original two films. That may explain it in words, but finding a concrete connection between the older movies and the newer ones is easier said than done.

Image Courtesy of Lionsgate

Regardless, the trilogy has been quite the rollercoaster ride. “Chapter 1” played like 30 minutes worth of content stretched into a 90-minute movie. But “Chapter 2” was a surprising step up despite a few problems of its own. As with its predecessors, “Chapter 3″ has its own set of issues. Yet it manages to do a serviceable job tying the trilogy together and bringing it to decent conclusion.

“Chapter 3” begins exactly where the previous film left off. After spending the last movie fleeing from the three masked psychopathic strangers, Maya (Madelaine Petsch) managed to kill the one called Pin-Up Girl just before the credits rolled. Now the remaining two, Scarecrow and Dollface, mourn her in their own twisted way before continuing their pursuit of Maya in and around the rural timber town of Venus, Oregon.

Elsewhere the prowling Sheriff Rotter (played by the wonderfully unsettling Richard Brake) patrols the forest-lined country roads with motivations that could be called sketchy at best. Meanwhile Maya’s sister, Debbie (Rachel Shenton) and her husband Howard (George Young) arrive in Venus with a hired bodyguard (Miles Yekinni) after learning Maya was never picked up by the ambulance sent to bring her back home to Portland. Their investigation intersects with the good sheriff while Maya tries to get a leg up on her maniacal pursuers.

Harlin breaks up the current day mayhem with several flashbacks that not only reveal the identities of the deranged serial-killing trio, but how they came together and how they’ve managed to continue murdering for years. These scenes add some disturbing context to the strangers, as well as the townsfolk of Venus. We end up learning more through them than any other part of the movie.

Image Courtesy of Lionsgate

As for our protagonist, much of “Chapter 3” emphasizes the evolution of Maya whose trauma makes her increasingly cold and calloused. It’s a tricky task for the committed Petsch whose performances throughout the trilogy have come in three phases. Each film asks her to do something different, yet all three performances are distinctly connected. So it’s impossible to fairly judge what she’s doing in “Chapter 3” without factoring in the previous movies. When you do, it’s easy to appreciate what she accomplishes.

The Strangers trilogy has become a cheap critical punching bag for many, but it’s far from the cataclysmic disaster it’s made out to be. It’s hard to justify spreading the story out into three feature length films and their strict dependency on seeing the other movies are somewhat of a handicap. As for “Chapter 3”, it may succeed in wrapping things up, but it’s not without its lapses in logic. Still, it manages to do what it needs to do as a final chapter. And judging by its box office performance, it could very well be the FINAL chapter.

VERDICT – 3 STARS

REVIEW: “Send Help” (2026)

Horror fans can rejoice! For the first time in seventeen years Sam Raimi returns to the genre he cut his teeth on. Well, sort of. His latest film, “Send Help” could easily be categorized as a survival thriller. But it’s Sam Raimi, the director of the original three Evil Dead movies. So to no surprise, “Send Help” has its share of grisly horror and pitch-black comedy. And I kinda loved every moment.

“Send Help” goes down like a cocktail of ”Horrible Bosses”, “Castaway”, and “Misery” but seasoned with Raimi’s own special sauce. Written by Damian Shannon and Mark Swift, the story gives a deliciously meaty role to Rachel McAdams who relishes every twisted second she’s given. Dylan O’Brien is wonderfully detestable as a smarmy privileged slimeball. Together they breathe fire into this bonkers mashup that goes in some delirious directions.

Image Courtesy of 20th Century Studios

McAdams plays Linda Liddle, a homely and awkward accountant working for a prominent consulting firm. Linda is a numbers guru who is hardworking and a valuable behind-the-scenes asset to the company. So much so that the CEO had promised to promote her to the vice president position. But after he unexpectedly dies, his entitled son Bradley (O’Brien) takes the reins and immediately promotes his college buddy Donovan (Xavier Samuel) to VP.

As for Linda (who Bradley is repulsed by), he secretly plans to have her transferred to an obscure go-nowhere position. But before he does, Bradley agrees to take Linda along on an overseas business trip to finalize a major merger. But as their private jet passes through a severe storm, its engines fail which sends the plane crashing into the ocean. Linda miraculously survives, washing ashore on a remote island somewhere in the Gulf of Thailand.

As Linda gets her bearings, she discovers an injured and unconscious Bradley on the beach. Lucky for him, Linda is a survival enthusiast with a load of skills she learned as an avid watcher of the television show “Survivor” (one of my favorite early gags). When Bradley finally comes to, he wastes no time belittling Linda’s efforts and asserting himself as her boss. But he quickly learns this isn’t the same “Linda from accounting” and they aren’t in the office any more. Madcap blood-soaked hijinks ensue.

Image Courtesy of 20th Century Studios

Raimi has a blast playing around with the multi-faceted dynamic between Linda and Bradley. He uses aspects from their professional and personal lives to define our hero and our villain. But one of the great joys of “Send Help” is its unpredictability. And we get good taste of it once Raimi starts blurring the lines between who’s good and who’s bad. We can’t help but root for Linda as she turns the tables on her douche of a boss. But “Send Help” has more up its sleeve than just that. And the moral ambiguity that arises from the primal chaos adds to the entertainment.

As some biting social commentary percolates amid the psychological mind games and physical savagery, Raimi never loses sight of the premise’s B-movie appeal. He giddily unloads some crazy action, gobs of gore, and warped humor with a nasty edge. Its biggest weakness is an ending that’s a tad too tidy. But the overall film is so insanely fun that it’s hard getting hung up on minor quibbles. Instead you’ll be amped to see it again. And you’ll once again be wondering why Rachel McAdams isn’t a bigger star.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

REVIEW: “Dracula” (2026)

The latest cinematic expression of Bram Stoker’s seminal 1897 horror classic “Dracula” is the simply yet fittingly titled “Dracula”. It comes from writer-director Luc Besson who offers up an unconventional reimagining of vampire mythology and the Dracula story itself. He spins a dark tale rooted more in romance than horror. Yet it has splashes of blood, some wild creative strokes, and even injections of humor, all of which make this more than some generic Dracula rehash.

While the core of Stoker’s story remains, the differences in Besson’s retelling come to light frequently and fairly quickly. With its period romance focus comes some unique style choices which work in surprising harmony with the film’s Gothic horror elements. There’s also an interesting thematic shift from science vs. religion to faith vs. apostasy. We also see a chunk of the story taking place in Paris rather than London.

Other differences are more character related. Dracula’s three brides (or sisters, depending on what interpretation you hold) are replaced by comical stone gargoyles which uproots a prominent thematic layer to Stoker’s story yet makes this more of a singular love story. Also absent is Dr. Abraham Van Helsing. Instead we get an unnamed priest from an order of vampire hunters. And there is no Renfield, at least not the version of him we’re used to.

Image Courtesy of Vertical

Besson’s story kicks off with a prologue set in 1480 Eastern Europe. Before setting out to face the invading Ottomans, Prince Vladimir of Wallachia (Caleb Landry Jones) seeks assurance from a high-ranking Cardinal (Haymon Maria Buttinger) that God will protect his precious wife Elisabeta (Zoë Bleu) while he’s in battle. But as she’s being ushered to a safer location, Elisabeta and her escort are ambushed and murdered. A devastated and angry Vladimir abandons God, vowing never to serve Him again until Elisabeta is returned.

400 years later in Paris, Dr. Dumont (Guillaume de Tonquédec) seeks help from the Vatican on a disturbing case that is outside of his expertise. He’s sent a Bavarian priest (played by a magnetic Christoph Waltz) from a group secretly commissioned by the Church. Once there, the priest is escorted deep below the hospital where Dumont introduces him to his patient, Maria (Matilda De Angelis), a volatile and seductive young woman who the priest quickly determines is a vampire.

We learn the priest’s order has been hunting the head vampire for centuries. And that head vampire is none other than Count Dracula, formerly Prince Vladimir. Now 400 years old and a husk of his former self, Dracula stays secluded in his Romanian castle while his “associates” scour the land for his reincarnated bride. But his search takes a turn when a solicitor from Paris named Jonathan Harker (Ewens Abid) pays him a business visit.

Image Courtesy of Vertical

Over the course of his chilling stay at the Count’s castle, Harker shows Dracula a photo of his fiancé Mina (also Bleu) who bears a striking resemblance to his long departed wife. Certain that he has finally found her, Dracula departs for Paris to reunite with his Elisabeta. From there Besson branches out with two storylines that are destined to intersect. One follows Dracula’s venture into Paris as he searches for Mina. The other follows the priest’s investigation as he searches for Dracula.

As Besson’s vision unfolds, it’s hard not to enjoy his nods to the classic story but also his own original reinventions. Nearly every change he makes is there to serve his biggest revision – making this a doomed Gothic love story. Jones is outstanding in portraying Dracula as a creepy yet tragically heartbroken figure rather than a predatory bloodsucking monster. Bleu is a revelation in her crucial dual-ish role. And Waltz is his usual captivating self despite the priest being strangely underwritten in spots.

In addition to the stellar performances, Besson is also helped by Colin Wandersman’s bold cinematography and Danny Elfman’s sweeping score. The period-rich production design and costumes add to the film’s stylish verve. It all enhances this beguiling new spin on Stoker’s classic. It’s chilling, alluring, wonderfully weird, and slyly funny at the most unexpected times. Best of all, it doesn’t try to be the grandest of all Dracula incarnations. The movie is very much its own thing which is a key reason it works so well.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

REVIEW: “Whistle” (2026)

In recent years the first quarter of the movie calendar has become a favorite time to release a slew of new horror movies. Among this year’s batch is “Whistle”, the latest film from director Corin Hardy and his first since 2018’s “The Nun”. It’s a movie that’s full of potential and ripe with the kind of substance that fan’s of the horror genre look for and relish. Sadly it squanders most of that potential in several frustrating ways.

“Whistle” is written for the screen by Owen Egerton who is adapting his own short story. He pens a tale that is built upon a clever idea but is surrounded with a copy-and-paste horror veneer. The generic high‑school milieu, its coming‑of‑age shallowness, one of the most preposterous character angles I’ve seen in years – it all keeps “Whistle” from being scary, interesting, original, or at times even logical.

Image Courtesy of Independent Film Company

“Whistle” opens with a prologue where Pellington High School’s star basketball player Mason Raymore (Stephen Kalyn) is incinerated in the locker room shower after being chased by a terrifying burning figure. It’s a horrific death which is witnessed by several of Mason’s teammates. Hardy uses it to set the table and to prime his audience for what’s to come….sort of.

Six months later me meet Chrys (Dafne Keen), a quiet and reserved teen who just moved to town after a life-changing tragedy. On her first day at Pellington High her cousin Rel (Sky Yang) introduces her to his friends, Grace (Ali Skovbye), Dean (Jhaleil Swaby), and Ellie (Sophie Nelisse). The don’t remotely seem like the kind of kids who would hang out together, but they fit the common horror movie archetypes – the nerd, the blond hottie, the brain-dead jock, and the smart girl.

Everyone at school seems to have moved right on from the Mason incident. So much so that no one even thought to clean out his old locker, which is assigned to Chrys. Inside of it Chrys finds an ornate Aztecan whistle which her teacher, Mr. Craven (Nick Frost) immediately takes to study. But the whistle find its way back to the teens who can’t resist blowing it, unleashing an ancient evil entity that curses them all to death.

Basically here is how the curse works. Everyone within the piercing earshot of its sound are cursed with facing whatever future death fate has chosen for them. After they “summon” the death, it stalks them, often ending in some gloriously gruesome fashion. Thoughts of “Final Destination” are unavoidable. But Hardy and Egerton have a few of their own cards to play. Regrettably not all of them work.

Image Courtesy of Independent Film Company

While “Whistle” is plagued by several disappointing choices, its most outrageous one comes with the character Noah (Percy Hynes White), a psychotic drug-dealing youth pastor who pops up at the most random times. He’s an utterly weightless inclusion who adds nothing to the movie other than a convenient antagonist. He would be easy to laugh off if not for the decision to wedge him into the film’s climactic ending.

Sadly “Whistle” is yet another trite chiller about a generic batch of kids who pay the consequences for their own foolish curiosity. Despite the film’s efforts, the underdeveloped and weakly defined characters never register beyond surface level. So we barely feel a thing when they are offed in an array of creatively gory ways. And we feel even less during the ludicrous, scare-free big finish and the franchise-teasing mid-credits scene. No thanks. I think one blow of the whistle was enough for me.

VERDICT – 1.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Solo Mio” (2026)

The romantic comedy has had its ups and downs like any other genre. But more than most, its films often find themselves so beholden to formula that they come across as uninspired retreads. Perhaps that’s why “Solo Mio” is such a breath of fresh air. Set around Rome and Tuscany, “Solo Mio” has a big heart, likable characters, plenty of well-delivered laughs, and more maturity than the standard-issue, run-of-the-mill romcoms of today.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying it’s “Roman Holiday”. But much liked that beloved William Wyler classic, “Solo Mio” features a similar charm and effervescence while being set to the same vibrant Italian backdrop. Of course the scenery is gorgeous and transporting without becoming a crutch. More surprising is the script which is brimming with humor, warmth, and pathos. But its biggest strengths are its two top performances from Kevin James and Nicole Grimaudo.

The movie comes from the Rhode Island filmmaking collective known as the Kinnane Brothers. Charles and Daniel serve as co-directors and work from a screenplay written by their siblings, Patrick and John. Kevin James pitched in with the script in addition to playing the lead role. Here he moves away from the slapstick silliness that has defined much of his career and gives us something endearing and heartfelt. It’s some career-best work.

Image Courtesy of Angel Studios

James plays Matt Taylor, a 4th grade art teacher engaged to the sprightly love of his life, Heather (Julie Ann Emery). The two plan a storybook wedding in Rome with a lavish Italian honeymoon to follow. But on their wedding day everything falls apart when Heather leaves Matt at the alter. Heartbroken, Matt tries to cancel their big honeymoon plans only to find their “package” is nonrefundable. So he decides to stay in Rome, taking their honeymoon alone with hopes that Heather comes back.

As Matt tries coping with his sadness, he meets two nosy and intrusive newlywed couples at his hotel who take it upon themselves to get Matt back on his feet (much to his chagrin). There’s the well-meaning but overly assertive Julian (Kim Coates) who is celebrating his third marriage to Meghan (Allyson Hannigan). And there’s the henpecked Neil (Jonathan Roumie) who just married his therapist Donna (Julee Cerda). Yep, his therapist.

The oddball couples have good intentions. But it’s a fateful visit to a local coffee shop that turns things around for Matt. It’s there that he meets an outgoing barista named Gia (a fabulous Nicole Grimaudo) who notices he is a bit out of sorts. Gia has an infectious personality and an irresistible charm which doesn’t go unnoticed by Matt. But he doesn’t give it much thought. After all, Heather may come to her senses. And how can a man in his 50s start a new relationship from scratch?

Image Courtesy of Angel Studios

But as Matt and Gia keep bumping into each other, a romance blossoms. Sure it’s a predictable turn, but the Kinnanes manage it unexpectedly well. It’s sweet without being schmaltzy and it’s playful without being silly. It’s a grownup relationship with authentic characters we genuinely care about. The lively Gia is a wonderful balance to the listless Matt. And when together, they come to life thanks to the natural, easy-flowing chemistry between James and Grimaudo.

As with any romantic comedy, there is a tension that threatens to uproot the central romance. Here it happens to be secrets that both are holding onto. Yet to the film’s credit, it’s handled in a refreshingly unique and mature way. It’s another welcomed surprise from a movie that speaks about relationships with such honesty – about how old ones can end and new ones can begin, no matter what stage of life you’re in.

“Solo Mio” may not cause a seismic shift in the romantic comedy landscape. But it does show that the genre isn’t out of gas just yet. It doesn’t veer too far away from the popular romcom blueprint. It simply livens things up by telling its own story rather than mimicking other films that came before it. James has never been better and Grimaudo should immediately be put on everyone’s radar. In the end, nearly all the pieces fall into place, making this a delightful, refreshing, and life-affirming crowd-pleaser.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

REVIEW: “Iron Lung” (2026)

The potential game-changing success of “Iron Lung” has become a compelling story on its own. The science-fiction horror film is written, directed, edited, and produced by Mark Fischbach, a popular YouTuber who goes by the online name Markiplier. He sits as one of the most popular streamers on the platform with over 38 million channel subscribers to date.

Fischbach self-financed “Iron Lung” for $3 million. Even more impressive, he self-distributed his film, initially only negotiating a small release in 60 independent theaters across the United States. He then reached out to his fans who spearheaded a massive grassroots campaign which caught the attention of several major theater chains. As of now, the film is showing in over 4,100 screens worldwide and made over $21 million in its opening weekend.

“Iron Lung” is based on a 2022 indie game developed and published by David Szymanski. It was a first-person simulation horror experience set entirely within a cramped midget submarine. The movie follows suit, keeping us confined inside a small iron shell for the duration of its two hours. The confinement itself is never an issue. But the two-hour runtime is, with Fischbach too often dragging things out considerably longer than he needs to.

The story is set in a distant future where mankind has colonized space. But a catastrophic event called the Quiet Rapture caused all star systems to vanish. Planets, stars, moons – all gone. And nearly all of humanity disappeared with them. The only survivors are the small numbers of people who were onboard space stations and starships. Those remaining desperately do what they can to stave off their extinction.

Enter Simon (strongly played by Fischbach), an antsy convict about to go on a dangerous mission as penance for a crime that we learn more about as the movie progresses. His mission is to descend deep into an uncharted ocean of blood on a desolate moon believed to hold information and resources crucial to human survival. His handlers have nothing but surface scans. So Simon is tasked with exploring the deep and photographing his findings in exchange for his freedom.

Simon’s small single-chambered submarine is welded shut and the lone porthole is sealed to prevent leaks due to the ocean’s intense pressure. That leaves him completely blind when submerged. His only means of navigation are his instruments and the crude images of an x-ray camera. His chief handler on the surface is the stern and cryptic Ava (Caroline Rose Kaplan) who barks Simon’s orders through a small speaker while trying to keep him focused.

There’s not a lot in terms of plot, but the first half-hour is riveting both narratively and technically. The early storytelling is equal parts harrowing and mysterious as new revelations raise the stakes while introducing an array of physical and psychological dangers. Tensions simmer, trust erodes, and deeper questions emerge. At the same time, Fischbach impressively acquaints us with the “Iron Lung” vessel, skillfully capturing the claustrophobia and peril through his camera and rich sound design.

But things take a frustrating turn as the film goes beyond slow-burning to meandering. Fischbach stretches his already limited story beyond its bounds, overextending sequences and repeating himself in scenes to the point of tedium. The gaps between new information get wider as Simon slowly navigates an assortment of drawn-out side quests that end up opening more questions than the movie ever answers.

Things do pick up in the final half-hour as Fischbach lets the blood gush (and I say that in its most literal sense). He and his team serve up a gory, blood-drenched ending that’s realized through a series of gnarly practical effects. And though it’s sometimes hard to discern what’s happening amid the dim lighting and shaky camera, the film’s ending goes for the jugular, more so visually than narratively.

In the end there is so much to admire about “Iron Lung” – the concept, the craftsmanship, the ambition, the determination. Markiplier shows some real creative chops, both in front of and behind the camera. Unfortunately the middle-hour’s languid pacing really stymies the movie’s momentum and zaps it of its tension, making the experience more grueling than thrilling. It’s a bummer because somewhere in “Iron Lung” is a tighter and more focused 90-minute movie that I would have loved.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS