Ben Affleck is Batman – Let the Outcry Begin!

typewriter-banner 1

Warner Brothers has picked their man. For the few who may not know, it was announced at this year’s San Diego Comic-Con that the upcoming sequel to “Man of Steel” would feature the one and only Batman. Yet Christian Bale was adamant that “The Dark Knight Rises” was his last time donning the cape and the cowl. So speculation has run wild over who would be the next incarnation of Batman. That question has been answered. It will be none other than Ben Affleck.

The debate over whether it’s a good idea putting Superman and Batman together in the film has been beat to death. Now the discussion shifts to Affleck’s casting. You can put your money on this – there will be plenty who automatically condemn this to failure and who immediately begin a campaign of negativity. Let me be clear, I certainly don’t want to be dismissive of any concerns or opinions on it. But this reaction is nothing new. In fact it’s expected. But it can also be way off the mark and let me give you two of the very best examples.

Remember several years ago when Marvel Studios was searching for their Tony Stark? Names popped up everywhere but nobody expected the choice that was made. I was as guilty as any at criticizing the casting of Robert Downey, Jr. as Iron Man. It was a decision that I felt was terribly off and I was pretty vocal about it. At the time Downey, Jr. hadn’t reached the superstardom that he has now and I was unable to reconcile his past movies from what would be required for Iron Man. Yet look at what happened. The casting if Downey, Jr. was pure genius and I honestly can’t envision anyone else taking on that role. But I wasn’t alone. The Internet lit up with negativity and backlash over what was perceived to be a really bad decision.

AFFLECK

There was another bit of casting that seemed really peculiar at its time. The late Heath Ledger was cast as the Joker, arguably the very best comic book villain. I was a huge fan of Ledger and I wasn’t shy about declaring him the best young actor in Hollywood at the time. But that doesn’t mean I thought he would make a great Joker. Yet while skeptical, I remained confident in Ledger’s acting to give him the benefit of the doubt. But not everyone was that forgiving. Many slammed the decision and were ridiculously vocal in there dismay. But do I need to spend much time on how wrong and misguided all the negativity was? Ledger would go on to deliver an unmatched Oscar winning performance that no one saw coming.

So what have we learned? First, we tend to get emotional and write off things on a whim. We often have our vision of what would be good and completely discount what a writer and director are visualizing. Second, we seem to write off what a talented actor or actress can bring to a character especially when there is good writing behind it. This current Batman treatment has been a huge improvement over the Joel Schumacher debacle and I have no reason to assume the casting of Affleck would even slightly resemble that garbage. So lets all take a breath, lean back, and see where this thing goes. Personally, I think there’s some great potential here!

Your Voices: On the Future of Movie Theaters

Your Voices

I love going to the movie theater. For me it makes movie-watching an experience. The giant high-definition screens. The booming surround sound. Going to the theater is an escape for me. It’s a chance to get away and immerse myself in another world or another story. These are the main reasons I look forward to every chance I get to sit in my stadium seating chair and enjoy a film at a theater. But some question just how much longer theater viewing will prosper. Today I hope to hear your opinions on this discussion. I’ll talk about it then it will be time for Your Voices.

Theater

Recently there has been a lot of conversation about the future of movie theaters. Some see theaters phasing out. They note the rising prices for taking an entire family to the movies (a feeling that jacked up 3-D prices aren’t helping). Some talk about the advancements in home theater setups. Some point to the ever increasing ‘On Demand’ movies that are available in numerous places. Whatever the reasons some are questioning the life span of the movie theater experience.

Personally I think movie theater viewing is in good shape. It still offers an experience that you just can’t get at home. Now clearly there are things they could do to make the footing more firm. But as a whole, people are still going to the movies and I think they’ll continue to. It’s an interesting discussion and now lets see what you have to say.

So now it’s time for Your Voices. What are your thoughts on the future of movie theaters?

So lets get to it. Now you know my thoughts, I would like to hear yours. I hope you’ll take time to share your thoughts on the fate of movie theaters. Are the above mentioned concerns valid? Do you think theater viewing is safe and sound? Let your voices be heard. Thanks again!

REVIEW: “The Ides of March”

IDES POSTER

Early on in George Clooney’s “The Ides of March” I began to feel that I was watching another heavy-handed exercise in political persuasion wrapped up as motion picture drama. I really hadn’t read much about the movie so I didn’t know what to expect. Thankfully the story moves away from that and gets into some much more interesting territory. This movie is a behind-the-scenes look at political campaigns, the closed-door wranglings, and the ‘win at all cost’ mentalities. And while the movie does get bogged down in its own sense of self-importance, there are some really intriguing things going on here.

Clooney directs, co-produces, and co-writes this 2011 political drama. He also plays Pennsylvania Governor Mike Morris who is involved in an extremely tight Democratic Primary race against an Arkansas Senator. Morris is a prototypical politician – a talking points robot but with the charm that causes followers to swoon. Now that was my impression of him. But the movie and many of the characters see him as a true light and hope for the country. In that group is the film’s main star Ryan Gosling who plays Stephen Meyers, Morris’ junior campaign manager. He’s an idealistic young man who is smitten with Morris’ vision and the political system.

IDES 1

Stephen begins to have his eyes opened at how the political campaign system works especially in a primary where the stakes are so high. He’s shown the ropes by the seasoned senior campaign manager Paul Zara (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and gets romantically involved with a campaign intern and daughter of the DNC Chairman (Evan Rachel Wood). Before long Stephen makes some critical and poor professional and personal decisions that puts him in the crosshairs of his enemies and those he thought were his friends. Several moral quandaries only complicate things for him and he quickly learns that the internal world of big politics isn’t as pure as he may have thought.

“The Ides of March” tries to be the “Wall Street” of the political campaign scene and it manages to pull it off in some instances. The whole ‘young energetic guy with big dreams comes face-to-face with reality’ angle isn’t that fresh but it works well enough. But perhaps the most entertaining parts of the film are when we get to see the inner workings of political campaigns. The jostling between the candidate’s staffs, the crunching of numbers, the state-by-state strategies, and the pursuit of pivotal endorsements are just some of the fascinating elements that Clooney is able to show us.

As the movie progresses, Clooney seems to put his foot on the throat of idealism. I appreciated what he was trying to do at this point in the movie and the statement he makes on our vision of politics and politicians is an interesting one. But basically the movie becomes a story of a bunch of bad people doing bad things because of bad choices. That works for a bit but after a while I knew I wanted more.

Ides 2

The movie’s strongest point lies with its cast. George Clooney is just a solid actor and he’s really good here. Hoffman is also just as good as he always is. I also really liked Paul Giamatti as the rival’s campaign manager. He feels sneaky and conniving but he definitely knows the game. Then there’s Jeffrey Wright as an opportunistic North Carolina Senator who is offering his state’s delegates to the highest bidder. It’s a small role but a really good one. But the one weak performance of the entire movie is Ryan Gosling. He does an okay job but he has no range of emotion. Sheepish grins and a few raises of his voice are about the only changes we get from him. He gives a passable performance but he could have added much more to this character.

“The Ides of March” is strange in that it doesn’t do anything really bad. But when looking at the movie as a whole it’s all over the map. The performances are strong except for the most important one and the story has too many lulls wrapped around its few high points. There’s a little bit of political preachiness but its offset by the crappy characters of those preaching it. But the biggest thing is that it’s just not as insightful and daring as it tries to be.

VERDICT – 2.5 STARS

REVIEW: “Cloverfield”

Cloverfield poster

Whenever I’ve heard people talk about the movie “Cloverfield” they usual use words such as “disappointing” or “mediocre”. In light of that my expectations for the film were pretty tepid. But “Cloverfield” had something else working against it. I’m not a fan of the handheld ‘found footage’ technique that at one point had become wildly popular. For me it only works in small doses and more often than not it turns out to be a liability. So here we are, five years after the film’s release and I’m giving it a shot.

I have to say that as a whole there’s not a lot to “Cloverfield”. It’s very cut-and-dry. It takes no real chances. It has practically no depth to it at all. Yet it’s completely honest. It’s committed to its simple but clear vision. It nicely captures that 1950’s sci-fi B-movie vibe. Most importantly I was with it from the opening government archives “credits” all the way through to its rip-roaring finale. Is it the greatest thing since sliced bread? No. But I enjoyed it a heck of a lot more than I anticipated.

As I mentioned, “Cloverfield” is filmed using the ‘found footage’ method which means that weak stomachs may end up a but queasy. It starts off calm enough. The first 15 minutes or so of its tight 85 minute runtime is spent at a party introducing us to the central characters. Rob (Michael Stahl-David) is preparing to move to Japan. His brother Jason (Mike Vogel) his girlfriend Lily (Jessica Lucas) plan the surprise going away party in their New York City apartment. “Hud” (T.J. Miller) is tasked with “documenting” the party on video. And then there’s Beth (Odette Yustman), a girl that Rob has a tricky romantic relationship with. That’s really all you need to know about any of these characters and we get it all in the first few minutes of the film.

The movie picks up when the party is interrupted by a huge tremor. The first reaction is that it’s an earthquake but we quickly learn that’s not the case. I won’t go into heavy detail but let me just say that the huge old school creature feature fan in me was pretty excited. I think this is where the movie fell short for some people. This is clearly a classic tip of the hat to the big monster pictures of the mid to late 1950’s mixed with a popular modern filmmaking technique. Your enjoyment of “Cloverfield” will probably depend on how much that interests you or how much of it you can buy into.

Cloverfield

Director Matt Reaves and writer Drew Goddard borrow from several older movies. My favorite are the television
newscasts taken straight from George Romero’s “Night of the Living Dead”. It’s here that we and the characters first learn about the deadly threat facing New York City. Things only get worse as the filmmakers throw us right down into the middle of the city in chaos. We’re take along with our main characters in what turns out to be a survival horror/science fiction. It’s simple but it’s at times exhilarating and it’s clever in its execution. The special effects are a blast and we get them in carefully measured doses. I also thought the performances were serviceable with the exception of T.J. Miller whose line reading is never all that convincing. He has an occasionally funny line but he’s mainly just your run-of-the-mill doofus.

There are a few other things that keep this from being a full-blown gem. There isn’t one hint of explanation in terms of the creature’s origin or makeup. It simply pops up downtown and the rest is catastrophic history. Now this was clearly intentional and it wasn’t a huge deal for me. But I still couldn’t help wanting to know more about this threat. Also, while the hand-held camera was more effective than in most films that have employed it, it’s still not my first choice for how I want to watch a movie. It’s also worth noting that “Cloverfield” was a really fun experience the first time through but it doesn’t seem to be the kind of movie that would have near the same effect the next time around.

Yet still I have to say I was surprised with this movie. I don’t agree with the common criticisms and I found myself thoroughly entertained. With its short running time it doesn’t overstay its welcome and it’s never misleading or pretentious. Sure it has some throw-away characters and you never get as much information as you would like. But it’s still a fun and well-made return to the monster movie genre that I still love to this day. In other words it delivered for me. I’m not saying it will have a long-lasting impact, but for 85 minutes I was glued to the screen and I soaked up every bit of what I was seeing.

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS

5 Phenomenal Movie Sea Captains

movie_theatre - Phenom 5

If you think about it there have been a ton of ship captains in the movies. Captains of planes, captains of starships, captains of sea vessels. I could go on and on. Today’s Phenomenal 5 is focusing on the open waters. There is some real variety to choose from when considering sea captains. There were some great examples that I hated to leave off but who hopefully will get some love in the comments section. With that in mind I certainly don’t claim this to be the definitive list. But in my mind these five sea captains are most certainly phenomenal.

#5 – Captain Jack Sparrow (“Pirates of the Caribbean”)

SPARROW

Okay, let’s pretend that the sequels never happened (at least not the last two). The first “Pirates of the Caribbean” film was a big surprise for me. It was loud, silly, rambunctious, and a load of fun. A key reason for its success was the wacky performance from Johnny Depp as the preposterously absurd Captain Jack Sparrow. He is on a mission to regain his beloved ship The Black Pearl and in doing so causes all sorts of mischief and chaos. He weaves through one nutty predicament after another and Depp has an absolute blast doing it. Unfortunately none of the sequels fully recaptured the fun of the first flick. But it’s a really good film in large part thanks to Captain Jack.

#4 – Captain E.J. Smith (“Titanic” – 1953)

EJ SMITH

Whenever you mention Titanic and the movies together people are almost always going to think of James Cameron’s 1997 blockbuster. Personally I prefer the 1953 Jean Negulesco version for several reasons. One reason is the cast of characters including Brian Aherne as the Captain E.J. Smith. Aherne brings an undeniable realism to his character as he faces a career highlight that turns into a devastating tragedy. His decision to satisfy the desires for a speedy voyage over the need for caution in icy waters proves to be costly. Yet watching Smith labor with the decision and with the consequences are some of my favorite parts of this terrific movie.

#3 – Captain Ahab (“Moby Dick”)

AHAB

I am a big fan of Gregory Peck and his performance as the whale-crazed Captain Ahab is just one reason why. It’s a full 30 minutes before Captain Ahab appears in the 1956 John Huston version of the old classic. But in that 30 minutes we have the mystery and intrigue of the character built through the words of others. That helps make Peck’s first appearance all the more rousing. With his glazed stare and peg leg in tow, Peck’s Ahab is the vengeance-fueled and consumed character brought so vividly to life from Herman Melville’s novel. It’s a wonderful performance from Peck and Ahab is a sea captain that is certainly memorable!

#2 – Captain Quint (“Jaws”)

QUINT

He may not be the captain of a huge whaling vessel, luxury liner, or pirate ship, yet Captain Quint from the ageless classic “Jaws” is one of the best movie captains you’ll find. First offered to Lee Marvin, the role of Quint was eventually given to Robert Shaw about a week before production. It was a great choice! Shaw snarls and barks like the most seasoned fisherman as he proudly helms his fishing boat the Orca. Quint has become an unforgettable movie character and his obsession with the giant great white shark leads to an amazing finale. I mean who will ever forget the final glimpse we get of Captain Quint?

#1 – Captain “Lucky Jack” Aubrey (“Master and Commander”)

MASTER COMMANDER

Russell Crowe has had several incredible period performances but few are better than his work as Captain Jack Aubrey in Peter Weir’s brilliant “Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World”. Talk about embodying a role! Crowe looks, acts, and feels the part and it’s his convincing presence that drives the entire film. Set in 1805 during the Napoleonic Wars, Captain Aubrey is commissioned with tracking down a fierce French warship called the Acheron. We stay aboard Aubry’s ship HMS Surprise as they battle things from storms to their French rivals. Through it all Captain Jack is a pillar of strength showing compassion as well as grit. He’s a true sea captain that I would have no problem following into any waters regardless of how dangerous they may be.

So there are my choices of phenomenal movie sea captains. See something I missed? I’d love to hear your thoughts and your choices. Please take time to comment below.

Keith & the Movies Valhalla Induction: “Aliens”

MT OLYMPUS

The Keith & the Movies Valhalla is a place of tribute for those movies that I hold in the highest regard. These are films that embody everything that is great about motion pictures. These are the best of the best – movies that I truly love and that stand above the rest. There are many great movies that won’t find their way into these sacred halls. But here you will find those films that I believe personify brilliance in filmmaking, storytelling, and entertainment. These glorious 5 star accomplishments are worthy of special recognition as the very best. Ok, enough of the high drama! In other words, these are my favorite movies of all time, ok?

ALIENSFew movies have ever built up my anticipation and excitement like James Cameron’s science fiction action flick “Aliens”. I still remember being a young teenager in 1986 grasping for any information I could about the film. I checked out magazine articles. I read the paperback novel. Eventually my excitement was rewarded with a movie that I believe is not only incredible but is one of the best sequels of all time.

“Aliens” is a movie that always felt ahead of its time. The look, the effects, the conception, everything with “Aliens” blew me away then and remarkably still holds up today. Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley is still one of the toughest and best female characters in cinema and she’s surrounded by well written and engaging supporting characters. The film’s brilliant mix of futuristic military action and science fiction horror is unmatched are it features so many scenes that I still know by heart. I love Ridley Scott’s “Alien” and it’s a hard movie to top. But “Aliens” just might do it. If not, it’s at least in the conversation and in my book that’s high praise. For more on “Aliens” check out my FULL REVIEW.

“Aliens” is the ninth inductee into the Keith & the Movies Valhalla. But there are more amazing movies to come in the near future so stay tuned. What are your thoughts on this James Cameron science fiction masterpiece? Is it worth my high praise or is it an overrated picture? You now know my opinion. I’d love to hear yours. Please take time to share your comments below.