5 Phenomenal Kid’s Adventures in the Movies

movie_theatre - Phenom 5

As kids some of us were a bit more adventurous than others. Nonetheless we all probably have those special little adventures that we still remember to this day. Well the movies are no different. Through the years they’ve given us some amazing kid’s adventures that entertained us in our youth or that reminded us of that childlike exuberance for something grand. So I thought this week we would look at five truly great adventures experienced by children onscreen. Now obviously there has been no shortage of children’s adventures so it would be silly to call this the definitive list. But you can’t deny that these five kid’s adventures are simply phenomenal.

#5 – “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe”

NARNIA

I don’t live under the illusion that “The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe” is a truly great film, but I do believe that it’s great fun and one fantastic kid’s adventure. This 2005 fantasy picture based on the immensely popular novels by C.S. Lewis raked in nearly $750 million at the worldwide box office. But lots of money doesn’t always equal a good film. Well this is a good movie that takes four young siblings on a fantastical adventure. Peter, Susan, Edmund, and Lucy are transported to Narnia via magical wardrobe. There they encounter glorious landscapes, talking animals, a wicked witch, and an epic scaled adventure that changes their lives and their relationships. Some truly magnificent supporting talent help to tell this fun kid’s adventure story.

#4 – “Honey, I Shrunk the Kids”

Honey

Ever have next door neighbors that you just can’t get along with? Well here’s a solution – invent a shrink ray. At least that’s what happens in the 1989 Disney adventure “Honey, I Shrunk the Kids”. Two neighboring families just don’t like each other. The adults gripe and argue about every little thing. The kids mirror that in their dislike for each other. But that all changes when the children are accidentally shrunk to 1/4 inch high and swept outside with the garbage. Obviously this sets the stage for a most unusual yet entertaining adventure. Blades of grass become redwoods and ants are behemoths. From the threat of a giant scorpion to the sweet indulgence of a gargantuan oatmeal cream pie, this amazing adventure not only brings the kids together but it does miracles for their parents as well.

#3 – “The Goonies”

Goonies

I can still hear Cyndi Lauper singing “Good Enough” as the Goonies take off on their bikes heading towards an unforgettable adventure. Named after there residence known as the “Goon Docks”, the Goonies were a group of pre-teen friends that went off on one final adventure in an attempt to find a hidden pirate treasure. This was a successful movie first released in 1985 and it has only gained admiration as the years have passed. Written (and probably co-directed if truth be told) by Steven Spielberg, “The Goonies” features some of his routine annoyances. But it also features some truly classic moments and a wonderful look at youth and friendship. And what a great adventure! How could it not be on this list?

#2 – “Stand by Me”

Stand-By-Me-Why-So-blu

Much like “The Goonies”, “Stand by Me” is a movie that seems to be appreciated more and more as time goes by. This 1986 coming of age tale from director Rob Reiner is certainly different than any other adventure on this list. It features four young friends each with their own troubles and challenges. They come together after hearing of the possible location of a missing boy’s body. They set off to find it and in the process learn more about each other and the pains of real life. The wonderful 1959 setting, the fabulous music, and some truly great performances by the young cast do a lot to set this film apart. And it features an adventure that is genuinely life-altering for these boys.

#1 – “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial”

E.T.

Wouldn’t you know Steven Spielberg’s name would pop back up on this list. And it’s yet again another great adventure from the 1980’s. “E.T.” is the first movie I remember seeing multiple times at the theater when it was first released in 1982 and not by choice. But I’ve grown to really appreciate this science fiction adventure classic and there are so many iconic scenes that have come from it. The adventure that young Elliot, his brother Michael, and sister Gertie embark on consists of hiding and eventually freeing their alien friend. Policeman, government agencies, and unbelieving parents prove to be huge obstacles and none have the best intentions. But Elliot and friends do and it’s a fantastic journey that we follow right up to the weepy but satisfying ending. Again, familiar annoyances aside, Spielberg nails it!

So there are my five phenomenal kid’s adventures found in the movies. I know there are tons more I could’ve mentioned. Please share your thoughts. I’d love to hear what would’ve made your list.

The Public Movie Defender : “The Time Machine” (2002)

TIME DEFEND

The idea behind The Public Movie Defender is to take up the cause of a particular movie that I believe is better than the majority of reviews it has received. These are movies which I feel are worth either a second look or at least a more open examination considering the predominantly negative opinions of them. The films chosen are ones that I like so therefore I’m taking their case and defending them before the court of negative opinion. Let the trial begin…

DEFENDANT #3 – “THE TIME MACHINE” (2002)

TIMEThe 1895 novel “The Time Machine” by H.G. Wells has long established itself as a science fiction classic. While I’ve never read the entire novel, I still remember seeing a film adaptation as a young boy. It was a film from 1960 which was directed and produced by George Pal (Pal had already made a film version of the other Wells science fiction classic “The War of the Worlds” in 1953). There was a made for TV movie in the late 1970s but Pal’s version from 1960 was my first real exposure to this timeless story (pun intended).

Time jump ahead 42 years to 2002 where Simon Wells, the great-grandson of H.G. Wells, made his live-action directorial debut with a fresh look at “The Time Machine”. It’s more of a remake of Pal’s film but it has several unique angles of its own. It’s certainly a movie I feel compelled to defend. It was universally dismissed and its current Rotten Tomatoes score sits at an abysmal 29%. I think this is a much better film than that and many of the criticisms fired its way are a bit unfair. For me Simon Wells puts out a vision with a little more heart and weight than the previous film and John Logan’s sharp screenplay is a crucial part of that.

But for me the biggest selling point for the film was the performance of Guy Pearce. There’s no need to dance around it – I’m a huge Guy Pearce fan. He’s an immensely talented and underrated actor who has shown diverse range throughout his acting career. This was one of the movies that really sold him to me. Some have found his performance “lifeless” while others have claimed he was miscast. I couldn’t disagree more. I think it’s Pearce’s performance and his ability to convey the driving force behind his character’s actions that gives this movie an injection of emotion. I also think he fits perfectly into the socially awkward role that’s called for early on.

Pearce plays Dr. Alexander Hartdegen, a Columbia University professor and part-time inventor. Alexander feels detached from his home in 1899 New York City where everyone are “dinosaurs” and “all alike, all in identical bowler hats”. He’s a nerdy fellow who loves tinkering and he has a hidden interest in the theory of time travel. Sometimes his interests take his focus off of his sweetheart Emma (Sienna Guillory) whom he truly loves. In fact, a horrible tragedy involving Emma is the catalyst for him building his time machine. In other words the romance is a key component to the story. It’s not delved into at great lengths but I do feel that Pearce sells it and the post-tragedy emotions especially well.

TIME 1

“The Time Machine” can really be broken down into two parts, the pre-machine 1899 New York and the unintended future year of 802,701. Yet in between those two main focuses are several scenes featuring different time periods. Alexander’s ‘fish out of water’ status and overloaded curiosity at his futuristic stops was a treat for me, again much due to the performance of Guy Pearce. These brief scenes give some explanation to the bleak future that Alexander ends up in. They also offer a small bit of commentary which I quite liked.

The second half of the film takes place in the aforementioned future of 802,701. Technology and advancement is gone and humanity has basically started over. It’s here that Alexander meets Mara (Samantha Mumba), a young woman who is part of a cliff dwelling tribe called the Eloi. Naturally the clash of a well-dressed future man and an indigenous native tribe is a huge obstacle but fortunately Lara speaks a little English (the stone language). Don’t worry, this isn’t a random thing. The movie does explain it. But Alexander soon learns that even that time period has its own problems, namely a subterranean species known as the Morlocks.

I’ve defended the acting and the story. Now let me talk a little bit about the special effects. I found the movie’s visuals range from the bland to the spectacular. The time traveling scenes are beautifully done and show off the technical rise of society all the way through another Ice Age and the blossoming of a new world after it. I also loved the design of Alexander’s time machine. There is such detail and craft in the way it’s made and you can almost believe in it completely. Now I wasn’t as impressed with the Morlocks once they appear. They’re just a tad too fake. But that doesn’t apply to Jeremy Irons who shows up as the Uber-Morlock – their leader. He is disgustingly eerie. His makeup alone was a big reason the film received an Oscar nomination in that category.

There are several other great touches and key components that make this such a great film. I adore Klaus Badelt’s brilliant and stirring score. Orlando Jones is a blast playing a holographic A.I. librarian. And the touching final scene still pricks my heart every time I watch it. “The Time Machine” is an underappreciated movie anchored by a fine lead performance by Guy Pearce. Simon Wells would suffer from exhaustion and Gore Verbinski would finish up the film. I give them both credit for giving us a delightful science fiction picture that’s far better than what many critics have said. It struck a chord with me the first moment I saw it and in my eyes it’s still an overlooked gem.

VERDICT : “THE TIME MACHINE” – 4.5 STARS

Your Voices: On the Most Disappointing Film of the Year (so far)

Your Voices

I’ve been amazed at how the 2013 movie year has been one of the most divisive in recent history. I know that every year has its share of movies that draw a variety of opinions. But it seems like this year there have been more movies that people have strong opinions on one way or another and the debates over them have been interesting to say the least. Well today I want to tap into some of those opinions. Many of us have expressed our favorite movies of the year so far. I want to focus on the biggest dissappointments of the year so far. I’ll share mine then it will be time for Your Voices.

IM3There have been a number of 2013 movies that I would consider dissappoitments. “Cloud Atlas”, “The Lone Ranger”, and “A Good Day to Die Hard” all fell well short for me but each had their own baggage that had me worried from the start. Then there are films like “Before Midnight” which I had sky-high expectations for but that ultimately left me dissappointed even though it’s still a pretty good movie. That’s the category that “Iron Man 3” falls into for me. At the start of the 2013 movie season “Iron Man 3” was #2 on my Most Anticipated of the Year list. The story sounded good. Robert Downey, Jr. was back. Guy Pearce, Ben Kingsley, and Rebecca Hall joined the cast. It was the launch of the second wave of Marvel’s Avengers solo films and it should have been amazing.

Unfortunately “Iron Man 3” didn’t live up to those expectations. It felt long, at times boring, and it spins off into directions that should infuriate any fan of the source material. But my aversion to the big changes isn’t just a fanboy’s rage. They don’t work all that well in the film and end up undoing the movies strengths. I really wanted more from “Iron Man 3”. But for me it fell into the same traps that many superhero third installments have (I’m looking at you “Spider-Man 3” and “X-Men: The Last Stand”). And even though it isn’t a horrible movie by any means, it still never succeeds as it should have.

So now you know my choice. It’s time for Your Voices. What has been the most disappointing film if 2013 so far?

So lets get to it. I hope you’ll take time to list some of your choices and share a few comments about them. Let everyone know why your pick left you disappointed. I have a feeling many of the films mentioned will also have their share of fans. Its been that kind of year. Thanks again!

REVIEW: “La Rafle” (“The Round Up”)

la_rafle_banner

Over the years there have been many movies that have examined the Jewish Holocaust. Some have dealt with the horrors surrounding the Nazi’s brutal and barbaric campaign while others have focused on the individual stories of heroism and survival. Due to the number of these films you would be hard-pressed to find an angle of the Holocaust that hasn’t been covered. But that does nothing to lessen my love for these movies that remind us of what were some of our world’s darkest days.

For me, when a movie about the Holocaust is done well it can be one of the more heartrending film experiences. Even with a familiar subject, if a director can tell a good story and lend their own unique voice to the film, I’m emotionally invested. Such was the case with “La Rafle” which is translated “The Round Up”. Much like “Sarah’s Key” (review coming very soon), a movie that came out the same year, “La Rafle” is set in Paris during the Vel’ d’Hiv Roundup. This was the mass arrest of over 13,000 Jews, mostly women and children, by the French police and secret service. Most were taken to the Vel’ d’Hiv stadium and kept in inhumane conditions before being taken to internment camps. Nearly all were eventually sent to and murdered in Auschwitz by the Nazis.

rAFLE1

“La Rafle” starts with a bit of fractured storytelling. It hops back and forth between the different people who we will follow as the story moves forward. The central focus is at first on the Weismanns, a Jewish family living in Paris’ Montmartre district. Schmuel (Gad Elmaleh) is an artist and devoted father. Sura (Raphaëlle Agogué) is a tender and loving mother. They have two daughters – one loves ballet while the other is spunky and outspoken. Then there is 11-year old Jo (Hugo Leverdez), their warm-hearted son growing up in occupied Paris. He’s playful and a bit rambunctious especially when he’s with his pals Simon and Noé. We see a lot of the story through Jo’s young and innocent eyes.

There are also breakaways to a young Protestant nurse named Annette Monod (Mélanie Laurent), a character who becomes a central focus in the second half of the film. But there are also scenes featuring a smug Adolph Hitler carrying on the facade of a family man while secret meetings are taking place at his command – meetings that put the Vel’ d’Hiv Roundup in motion. That leads to the morning of July 16th, 1942 when the French police under Vichy orders do the unthinkable. The film takes us through the horrible arrests and “processing” of that morning and then puts us in Vel’ d’Hiv stadium with the Weismanns and the others we’ve come to know.

la-rafle-still-1-smallAnnette comes to the stadium and volunteers medical help. While she’s there she develops close relationships with Jo and some of the other children. She’s also inspired by a dedicated Jewish doctor named Sheinbaum (Jean Reno). It’s here that the atrocities become real to her and she sets out to do everything she can to help. All of these characters have their paths connected by this one truly horrific event – something that will scar them, the country, and the entire world.

“La Rafle” works because writer and director Roselyne Bosch keeps her focus on the characters. She leaves the graphic depictions of the violence and barbarism to other movies yet its looming reality is always with this film. The tension of the real life events soak every scene even if they aren’t visually depicted. I found that to be very effective. Bosch wants us to connect and invest in the characters and once we do that, the emotion and the intensity flows. Now the movie does feel polished and some have criticized it for its lack of edge. Their are scenes where that criticism is fair but overall I think it misses what Bosch is going for.

Perhaps the most powerful component of the film is that each of its characters were real life people who faced the roundup and what followed. Bosch used their real names and their true stories. For me that just added to the stinging realism. The wonderful costume and set design also worked to draw me in. The shots of Montmartre seems plucked right out of that decade and every person fit perfectly in the period they were representing.

The performances are another strong point. I’ve grown to be a Mélanie Laurent fan. After seeing her in a handful of French and American films, I find her to be an impressive actress. I also really appreciated Raphaëlle Agogué’s work. There’s a subtlety and humble beauty to her performance that really worked for me. I also liked Gad Elmayeh who brings a very believable and well written father to life. I also have to mention the performances from the children. They play a big role in this film and without their solid work the movie would have suffered.

La rafle3

I wish I could say this was a flawless 5 star movie but there were a couple of issues I had with it. The movie seems to assume that the audience is familiar with the subject. Now being a French production I’m sure many of the film’s bigger audiences were very familiar with the history. Having read a decent amount about the events, I was pretty knowledgable as well. But I still found myself unable to follow some of the scenes featuring the planning and the politics between the Vichy and the Nazis. They aren’t all that well constructed which was a little frustrating. I also felt the film slowed down a little too much in the middle. It certainly didn’t kill the film’s effect but it was noticeable. Aside from these gripes, “La Rafle” strikes every chord and tells a truly incredible story.

While in Paris last year my wife and I took time to visit the Shoah Memorial. It was one of the most sobering experiences of my life. This movie reminded me of that visit and of the terrible events faced by the Jewish people in Paris. “The Round Up” is a pretty polished film but its also reverent, sober, and responsible. It’s received some unfair criticism and it’s a film that has went unseen by many here in America. That’s a shame. For me it was wonderfully done and it’s an easy film to recommend.

VERDICT – 4.5 STARS

REVIEW: “The Wolverine”

WOLVERINE POSTER

One of the best things to come out of the first three X-Men movies was the casting of Hugh Jackman as the feral, adamantium clawed Wolverine. I was amazed at just how well Jackman embodied the look, attitude, and violence of one of Marvel’s most popular characters. While the trilogy’s final X-Men flick was an utter disappointment, Jackman never failed to be convincing. But even his personality and gravitas couldn’t save the mess that was “X-Men Origins: Wolverine”, a spin-off film intended to build on the success of the character. It was a wreck plagued by poor writing and poor execution.

But that disaster didn’t sink Jackman’s Wolverine adventure. Now four years later we have another attempt at giving us a good stand alone movie. It’s simply titled “The Wolverine” and let me start by saying it’s a considerably better film. In fact, it’s not only better, it’s a really good summer superhero flick anchored by a good story, fantastic action, and yet another great performance from Jackman. It’s a pleasant surprise that helps wipe the last unmitigated travesty from my memory.

WOLVERINE 1

“The Wolverine” takes our indestructible anti-hero to Japan, a place where (in comic book mythology) he has strong ties. Logan (Jackman) finds himself to be an emotional wreck. Driven by the pain of Jean Grey’s (Famke Janssen) death in “The Last Stand”, he lives in a secluded mountain cave, vowing to never hurt anyone again. But wouldn’t it be a boring movie if he kept that vow? Logan encounters a secretive Japanese woman named Yukio (Rila Fukushima) who convinces him to come to Japan to say goodbye to a dying past acquaintance. Once there he finds himself wrapped up in a web of family dysfunction, political corruption, and organized crime. With his healing powers mysteriously targeted, he finds himself vulnerable for the first time and threatened by an assortment of baddies.

The vast majority of the film takes place in Japan and it works wonderfully. The locations and environments look great and the setting and the story meld to perfection. It’s also helped by an array of interesting characters. Haruhiko Yamanouchi plays Logan’s old acquaintance Yashida, a billionaire technology mogul now on his deathbed. Svetlana Khodchenkova plays an American nurse hired to keep Yashida alive. The fantastic Japanese actor Hiroyuki Sanada plays Yashida’s son, a man knee-deep with mob ties. The beautiful Tao Okamoto is great as Yashido’s beloved granddaughter Mariko. Will Yun Lee is quite fun as Kenuichio Harada, a shadowy character with mixed motivations. Fanboys like me will recognize that name as the original Silver Samurai. Sadly this is a much different role but he’s still very good.

All of these characters flourish in a sharp and entertaining script that never loses sight of what it is. It perfectly utilizes Jackman’s abilities to channel a tortured soul mixed with a volatile and violent nature. He’s such a fascinating character. I also have to applaud the special touches brought by director James Mangold. Even when his handheld camera becomes a bit disorienting, he still gives the movie a beautiful visual flair. But as you know, Wolverine is all about the action. The fight scenes are great and there’s one particular chase sequence through the streets and shops of Tokyo that I really liked.

WOLVERINE2

Yet while the action was very good, I never got past the feeling that Mangold was holding back. Obviously the studios wanted a PG-13 movie and I get that. But Wolverine’s special brand of action mixed with this particular story seemed to be begging for a grittier and more violent edge. And I have to mention that the movie does raise some pretty big questions in the final act. Questions based more on inconsistencies and gaps and logic. In other words, it had its share of head scratching moments. It also occasionally flirts with cliché yet thankfully never fully embraces it. Most importantly, none of these blemishes dampened my enjoyment of this film.

“The Wolverine” may have been lost in the shadows of bigger 2013 comic book movies such as “Iron Man 3” and “Man of Steel” but it deserves its place at the table. Jackman hasn’t lost a step and his charisma and physicality ooze from every scene. And unlike the earlier “Iron Man 3”, this felt more like a Marvel superhero experience – a great central character, an exciting story, some awesome action, and a mid-credits secret scene that instantly amped me up for what’s next. In other words, “The Wolverine” is a really good movie and one of the better surprises of the year.

VERDICT – 4 STARS

REVIEW: “Despicable Me 2”

DESPICABLE POSTER

Being the lukewarm animated movie fan that I am, imagine my surprise when “Despicable Me” ended up being one of my favorite movies of 2010. I championed the film, recommending it to anyone who would listen and making my case for how it was considerably better than that year’s animated juggernaut “Toy Story 3”. “Despicable Me” would go on to be a surprise hit eventually earning over $540 million at the box office. Now if that doesn’t guarantee a sequel I don’t know what does.

Well now it’s three years later and this summer we get “Despicable Me 2”. Many of the same people are back this time around including the directing team of Pierre Coffin and Chris Renaud, the writing team of Cinco Paul and Ken Daurio, and of course the voice talents of Steve Carell, Kristen Wiig, Miranda Cosgrove, and Russell Brand. Joining them this time is Benjamin Bratt and Steve Coogan. So all of the pieces are in place for a great sequel, right? The same talented cast and crew and a very successful foundation to build it on. But does it succeed or does it commit some of the same cardinal sins that many sequels have in the past?

DESPICABLE 2

Well I definitely loved revisiting these characters. Gru (Carell) is enjoying his time away from villainy fathering Margo (Cosgrove), Edith (Dana Gaier), and Agnes (Elsie Fisher). The film starts with what’s probably my favorite scene – a backyard birthday party for the unicorn loving Agnes. Here we are quickly reintroduced to the minions. In fact we see a lot more of them in “Despicable Me 2”. It’s pretty clear that the filmmakers noticed the huge popularity of the happy yellow henchmen and gave them bigger roles. Honestly, I was just fine with that. They’re just so darned funny and most of the movie’s biggest laughs feature them. We’re also introduced to Lucy Wilde (Wiig), a perky Anti-Villain Agent. This is a bigger and entirely different role than Wiig had in the first film.

All of these characters are a lot of fun and watching how the story employs them is a hoot. But not every character works so well. Benjamin Bratt voices a mysterious Mexican restaurateur who, weight gags and dance skills aside, never adds much to the film. It’s a pretty important role that was originally set to be played by Al Pacino. But it isn’t Bratt’s work that dulls the character. He’s just so unevenly written. He’s never that interesting and when he’s finally opened up, he doesn’t leave much of an impact. In fact I would argue that he slows things down a bit.

That kind of leads into my bigger gripe with “Despicable Me 2”. In the first film I never felt myself drifting away or struggling to focus my attention. I did here. The middle of the film is full of funny moments but there are also times where it feels like every other animated movie. Its silly slapstick and overwrought dialogue came across as more formulaic than fluid, something I never got from the first picture.

DESPICABLE 2 2

But as I said, it isn’t as if the middle of the film doesn’t have its high points. In fact, the movie itself has several high points. One of the great things about this series is how it surrounds some pretty real and heavy subjects with humor and it does it responsibly. It also features a particular sense of humor that is broad enough for the entire family. I really appreciate that. I love the quirky and offbeat comedy that’s mixed within the usual animated slapstick. Quirky also defines the animation itself. I absolutely love the look of the film, the locations, and especially the characters. Whether it be an accentuated neck, pointy nose, or frazzled hair, many of the characters crack me up just with their look.

But my biggest pleasure is in the heart that this film has. While it does get pushed aside at times, “Despicable Me 2” still has enough of the heart that made the first film such a treat for me. I just wish the movie had kept the same consistency and uniqueness. Still, it’s loaded with laughs and it was great to spend more time in this wacky world with these wacky characters. Minions for life!!!

VERDICT – 3.5 STARS